Mental Retardation Intellectual Disabilities: Main pitfalls in the current classification of mental - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Mental Retardation Intellectual Disabilities: Main pitfalls in the current classification of mental

Description:

How should we name it? How should MR be defined and classified? ... Multiple meanings of words. Scientific meaning. Social meaning. Policy-Administration meaning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: wpa7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mental Retardation Intellectual Disabilities: Main pitfalls in the current classification of mental


1
Mental Retardation / Intellectual Disabilities
Main pitfalls in the current classification
of mental retardation.
  • Luis Salvador-Carulla
  • University of Cadiz (Spain)
  • Head. Section of MR, WPA.
  • luis.salvador_at_telefonica.net

2
Mental Retardation Main points
  • Highest costs in Health Care
  • High prevalence (1-4)
  • High psych comorbidity (30)
  • Ignored as Mental Health Problem
  • Important contributions
  • Stigma and naming
  • Health approach vs illness appr.
  • Behavioral problems classif
  • Behavioral phenotypes

3
Mental Retardation Main pitfalls
  • Name/Concept MR
  • Classification of MR
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Behavioral problems

4
What is in a name?
  • Continuous name shift
  • Mental Retardation and Learning Disabilities
    are outdated and unacceptable for users
  • Intellectual Disabilities adopted by
  • IASSID / AAMR
  • US Presidents Commission
  • DSM-IVTR 2005
  • Is it adequate?

American Association on Mental Retardation
(AAMR). Ad hoc Committee on Terminology and
Classification. AAMR News Notes, 14 (5)
10-13, 2001.
5
What is Mental Retardation?
  • A DEFICIT?
  • (ICF- 2002)
  • A DISABILITY?
  • (AAMR -2002)
  • A DISORDER?
  • (ICD-10 DSM- IV TR)

6
The Concept of Mental Retardation
  • - MR is neither a disease nor a disability. MR a
    syndromic grouping similar to the construct of
    Dementia
  • It includes a heterogeneous group of nosological
    entities characterised by a DEFICIT in cognitive
    functioning prior to skills acquisition through
    learning
  • Cognitive impairment diverge accross different
    conditions with MR
  • The intensity of the deficit is such to interfere
    in a significant way with individual normal
    functioning (restriction in activities and
    limitation of participation - CIF)

7
What is Mental Retardation?
  • How should we name it?
  • How should MR be defined and classified?
  • How valid are the diagnostic criteria?
  • What is Mental Retradation?

8
Mental Retardation ICD-10, DSM-IV-TR, AAMR
  • Low intellectual functioning (IQ 70)
  • Impairment in basic adaptative skills
  • Onset before 18 yrs old
  • The present concept based on IQ and age limit is
    imprecise and hampers research, needs assessment,
    and planning and provision of services for
    persons with MR

9
  • CRITERION A IQ Level
  • Complex construct with higher difficulties in the
    extremes
  • Several domains of intelligence (lack of intnl.
    agreement)
  • IQ does not relate to specific cognitive
    impairment in diff. diseases with MR (Down vs
    William syndromes)
  • WAIS/WISC IQ was not developed for assessing MR
  • Confounding factors in measuring IQ (Flynn
    effect)
  • IQ is culturally bound and international
    standarisation of instruments is limited
  • Differences in cut-off points among
    classification systems
  • Useful for classifying subtypes ?

10
Criterion B Adaptative behaviour Skills
AAMR 2002 3 domains, 16 types, 26 skills
  • Dimensional vs. Categorical
  • Difficulties in operational use for identifying
    groups of individuals
  • Heterogeneity in assessment instruments and
    content
  • Defines a problem by its function (confusion
    between a pathological entity and its
    consequences)
  • Disease vs. Disability
  • Interaction with environment
  • Cultural variability

11
New concept of MR
  • Criterion A Substitute Intelligence by a
    grouping of cognitive impairments
  • Criterion B Simplify, operationalise, and reach
    intnl. agreement on domains, types and
    assessment of adaptative skills
  • Criterion C Should be deleted
  • Criterion D Exclusion hierarchical criterion
    (i.e. MR when generalised developmental
    disorder is absent)
  • MULTIAXIAL Changes in all axis

12
New concept of MR
  • Metasyndromic condition as in Dementia Spectrum
  • Such as MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT (MCI)
  • Polynomious polysemic approach
  • Multiple meanings of words
  • Scientific meaning
  • Social meaning
  • Policy-Administration meaning
  • INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY
  • EARLY COGNITIVE DEFICIT (ECD)

13
Problems of Psych Diagnostic Systems in MR
  • Weighted towards verbal items
  • Multiaxial System
  • Axis I Psych crit. useful ONLY for high verbal
    skills IQ
  • Axis IIPers. Dis. MR in diff axis
  • Axis III Inadequate Needs to be expanded
  • Axis IV Different Impact of Life Events
  • Axis V Cluster in few ranges due to previous
    disability
  • Diagnostic Categories Higher error as more
    detailed (i.e. Non-affective psychoses vs
    Schizoph.)
  • Diagnostic criteria have not been validated in
    MR Different symptoms (equivalents) // Temporal
    course
  • Exclusion criteria (dd) // Functioning

14
New Classification Systems
  • Royal College of Psych UK-Ireland (2001)
  • Royal College of Psychiatrists. Diagnostic
    Classification of Learning Disabilities (DC-LD).
    OP 48. Gaskell, 2001
  • American Psych Assoc / NADD (2005) DSM-IVTR ID
  • DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL OF PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS FOR
    PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES R.
    Fletcher M First

15
MULTIAXIAL DC-LD SYSTEM
  • Axis I Level of MR
  • Axis II Cause of MR
  • Axis III Psychiatric Disorders
  • Level A Developmental Dis.
  • Level B Psychiatric Illness
  • Level C Personality Disorders
  • Level D Problem Behaviors
  • Level E Other disorders

Royal College of Psychiatrists. DC-LD. OP 48.
Gaskell, 2001
16
Behavioral Problems Assessment
  • Independent
  • Multiaxial approach
  • Comprehensive
  • Ecological-topographic approach
  • Multicausality Behavioral Phenotypes
  • Developmental-evolutional approach
  • Standardised

17
  • I would give my life for the simplicity on the
    other side of complexity.
  • Oliver Wendell Holmes

18
DC-LD Axis IIID
  • LEVEL D Problem Behaviours
  • General diagnostic criteria
  • Verbally aggressive behaviour
  • Physically aggressive behaviour
  • Destructive behaviour
  • Self-injurious behaviour
  • Sexually inappropriate behaviour
  • Oppositional behaviour
  • Demanding behaviour
  • Wandering behaviour
  • Mixed problem behaviours

19
Behavioral Phenotype
  • Behavioral pattern which characterises a
    population group, is directly related to
    genotype, appears at a given stage in the life
    cycle, and may vary for the defined group through
    the life cycle
  • Behavioral Phenotype
  • Disease related
  • Mental Retardation / ECD related
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com