Title: Indicators for change: Measuring gender equality in employment
1Indicators for changeMeasuring gender equality
in employment
- Pamela Thomas
- Australian National University
- IWDA Symposium on Harmonisation of Gender
Indicators - June 16-17, 2006
2Key points
- Indicators, especially those measuring progress
at international and national levels are often
blunt tools quantitative - Local and project level indicators allow for
richer and more qualitative information, but this
needs to be linked to national and international
data bases - Need to consider the linkages between the MDG
targets and indicators - Need to look behind and beyond the data ask
why? What impact? - In developing program goals, strategies
indicators consider the assumptions you make
3MDG Goal 3 Gender Equality and Empowerment of
WomenTarget Eliminate gender disparity in all
levels of education by 2015
- Indicator 11 Share of women in wage employment
in the non agricultural sector -
- Indicator 45 the unemployment rate among young
people 15-34 years by sex -
4Womens share of waged employment in the non
agricultural sector () (Elson Keklik 2002 35
Progress or the Worlds Women)
- Country
- Thailand
- Philippines
- Indonesia
- Fiji
- Pakistan
- 1980s 2000
-
- 42 47
- 41 49
- 28 37
- 26 31
- 5 8
5When you look behind the data
- Women are less likely than men to hold paid and
regular jobs and more often work in the informal
economy which provides little financial
securityinformal employment is persistent and
widespread the average earnings are too low to
raise households out of poverty - (Chen et al 20057 Progress of the Worlds
Women)
6Womens and mens share of informal employment
in non agricultural employment (Grown, Gupta
Kes 200591)
- Country
-
- Thailand
- Philippines
- Indonesia
- India
- Kenya
- Women Men
-
- 54 49
- 73 71
- 77 78
- 86 83
- 83 59
7Reviewing indicator 11 womens share of non
agricultural wage employment
- Urban focus, middle class bias
- Inconsistent data or little accurate data
available - Many women are self employed or in the informal
sector - in part time, temporary, seasonal,
insecure jobs - Does not capture gender gaps in pay and
conditions - Many women in poor countries work in the
agricultural sector - Does not account for unpaid economic work
8Assumptions
- What are the assumptions behind
- including womens share in wage employment in
the non-agricultural sector as a measure of
empowerment? -
9Looking behind the indicators
- Why is the proportion of women in wage employment
increasing in many countries? - What determines this?
- To what extent does employment benefit/empower
women? - What kinds of employment do women have?
- What level of pay in relationship to men?
- What conditions?
- What security?
- What longer term social, economic, health
impacts?.....
10.looking behind the indicators
- do women and men in non agricultural wage
employment earn enough to raise them out of
poverty? - what are the historical precedents?
- How can we assure decent work for women and
men? - how do we account for the work these women do
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Recommended employment indicators for MDG
3(Grown,Gupta Kes 2005127 Chen et al
20054ECLAC 20027ILO 2002)
- the share of women in wage employment and self
employment by type of employment agricultural,
non agricultural, formal and informal - the gender gaps in earnings in wage employment
and self employment
18 Decent work
- How do we support ILOs Decent Work indicators
to provide more in-depth information and
understanding of womens and mens economic
involvement? - What policies need to be put in place to ensure
work empowers rather than disempowers?
19- Womens entry into the paid labour force has not
resulted in the economic security needed to
improve gender equityso long as the majority of
women workers are informally employed, gender
equality will also remain an elusive goal (Chen
et al 20057).
20- there is a trend among the very poor towards
gender equality in the workforce neither men
nor women are paid a liveable wage and
increasingly both are pawns in the global
economic order.