Three Little Pigs, Three Blind Mice, and Tangrams: Exploring Geometric Relationships - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Three Little Pigs, Three Blind Mice, and Tangrams: Exploring Geometric Relationships

Description:

... sized triangle is congruent to twice the length of the leg of ... Emily Finney. Teacher, Somewhere in CA. 2004 NCTM Annual Convention. Philadelphia, PA ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:300
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: lorinort
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Three Little Pigs, Three Blind Mice, and Tangrams: Exploring Geometric Relationships


1
Three Little Pigs, Three Blind Mice, and
Tangrams Exploring Geometric Relationships
  • David S. Allen, Ed.D.
  • Assistant Professor, KSU
  • Melisa J. Hancock,
  • Teacher in Residence, KSU
  • Emily R. Finney
  • Teacher, Somewhere in CA

2004 NCTM Annual ConventionPhiladelphia, PA
2
National Standards
  • National Standard Geometry
  • Analyze characteristics and properties of two-
    and three-dimensional geometric shapes and
    develop mathematical arguments about geometric
    relationships.
  • Specify locations and describe spatial
    relationships using coordinate geometry and other
    representational systems
  • Apply transformations and use symmetry to analyze
    mathematical situations
  • Use visualization, spatial reasoning, and
    geometric modeling to solve problems.

3
Pierre van Hiele
  • Level 0 Visualization
  • The objects of thought at level 0 are shapes
    and what they look like.
  • Students recognize and name figures based on the
    global, visual characteristics of
    the figure.
  • Children at this level are able to make
    measurements and even talk about properties of
    shapes, but these properties are not abstracted
    from the shapes at hand.
  • It is the appearance of the shape that defines it
    for the student.
  • A square is a square because it looks like a
    square.
  • The products of thought at level 0 are
    classes or groupings of shapes that seem to be
    alike.


4
Pierre van Hiele
  • Level 1 Analysis
  • The objects of thought at level 1 are classes
    of shapes rather than individual shapes.
  • Students at this level are able to consider all
    shapes within a class rather than a single shape.
  • At this level, students begin to appreciate that
    a collection of shapes goes together because of
    properties.
  • Students operating at level 1 may be able to list
    all the properties of squares, rectangles, and
    parallelograms but not see that these are
    subclasses of one another, that all squares are
    rectangles and all rectangles are parallelograms.
  • The products of thought at level 1 are the
    properties of shapes.


5
Pierre van Hiele
  • Level 2 Informal Deduction
  • The objects of thought at level 2 are the
    properties of shapes.
  • As students begin to be able to think about
    properties of geometric objects without the
    constraints of a particular object, they are able
    to develop relationships between and among these
    properties.
  • If all four angles are right angles, the shape
    must be a rectangle. If it is a square, all
    angles are right angles. If it is a square, it
    must be a rectangle.
  • With greater ability to engage in if-then
    reasoning, shapes can be classified using only
    minimum characteristics.
  • Four congruent sides and one right angle can
    define a square.
  • The products of thought at level 2 are
    relationships among properties geometric objects.


6
Pierre van Hiele
  • Level 3 Deduction
  • The objects of thought at level 3 are
    relationships among properties of geometric
    objects.
  • Earlier thinking has produced in students
    conjectures concerning relationships among
    properties. Are these conjectures correct? Are
    they true?
  • As this analysis takes place, a system complete
    with axioms, definitions, theorems, corollaries,
    and postulates begins to develop and can be
    appreciated as the necessary means of
    establishing truth.
  • At this level, students begin to appreciate the
    need for a system of logic that rests on a
    minimum set of assumptions and from which other
    truths can be derived.
  • This is the level of the traditional high school
    geometry course.
  • The products of thought at level 3 are deductive
    axiomatic systems for geometry.


7
Levels of Application
Van de Walle, J. A. (2003). Elementary and Middle
School Mathematics Teaching Developmentally
(Fifth Edition). New York, NY. Addison Wesley
Longman.
8
Tangrams
  • The Tangram Lesson
  • Available on Website (Written for fourth grade)
  • Uses the 5E-Inquiry Model
  • Applicable to all grades (you must determine
    where your students are and what types of
    experiences they are ready for)
  • 2. Goals and Objectives
  • Given a set of tan pieces TLW identify linear
    relationships between the pieces using correct
    geometric vocabulary with no errors.
  • Given a set of tangram puzzles TLW identify the
    correct transformations acted upon each tan piece
    as the pieces are shifted during the puzzle
    completion with no errors.
  • Given a sheet of graph paper with a shape drawn
    upon it TLW draw the shape in a second location
    after the shape has been acted upon by two
    geometric transformations.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Task 1
  • Using the three small pieces (two small triangles
    and the medium size triangle) create these five
    basic geometric shapes.
  • Square
  • Trapezoid
  • Parallelogram
  • Rectangle
  • Triangle

11
Triangle
12
Rectangle
13
Trapezoid
14
Parallelogram
15
Square
16
Explanation Task 1
  • Linear Relationships
  • The hypotenuse of the small triangle is congruent
    to the leg of the medium size triangle.
  • The hypotenuse of the medium sized triangle is
    congruent to twice the length of the leg of the
    small triangle.
  • The two small triangles are congruent because
  • The legs of both triangles are congruent.
  • The hypotenuse of both triangles are congruent.
  • The angles of both triangles are congruent.

17
Explanation Task 1
  • 2. Transformations
  • Flips or Reflections
  • Slides or Translations
  • Turns or Rotations
  • Triads
  • Three Little Pigs
  • The Trinity
  • The Three Tangram Pieces

18
Task 2
  • Using the five small pieces (two small triangles,
    medium size triangle, rhombus, parallelogram)
    create these five basic geometric shapes.
  • Square
  • Trapezoid
  • Parallelogram
  • Rectangle
  • Triangle

19
Rectangle
20
Trapazoid
21
Paralellogram
22
Triangle
23
Square
24
Explanation Task 2
  • Linear Relationships
  • The leg of the small triangle is congruent to the
    side of the square.
  • The leg of the small triangle is congruent to the
    small side of the parallelogram.
  • Therefore the side of the square is congruent to
    the small side of the parallelogram.
  • The hypotenuse of the small triangle is congruent
    to the long side of the parallelogram.
  • The leg of the medium triangle is congruent to
    the long side of the parallelogram.

25
Task 3
  • Using all seven tan pieces create these five
    basic geometric shapes.
  • Square
  • Trapezoid
  • Parallelogram
  • Rectangle
  • Triangle

26
Rectangle
27
Parallelogram
28
Trapezoid
29
Triangle
30
Square
31
Connecting the Tasks
  • Working with Three Small Pieces
  • Identifying Linear Relationships
  • Examining Transformations
  • Working with Five Small Pieces
  • Application of Linear Relationship Identification
  • Strengthening Language Descriptions of
    Transformations
  • Working with Seven Pieces
  • Similar Task to Three Small Pieces
  • Introduce concept of Ratio and Proportion
  • 4. Examining Area is Another Lesson

32
Levels of Application
Van de Walle, J. A. (2003). Elementary and Middle
School Mathematics Teaching Developmentally
(Fifth Edition). New York, NY. Addison Wesley
Longman.
33
Three Little Pigs, Three Blind Mice, and
Tangrams Exploring Geometric Relationships
  • David S. Allen, Ed.D.
  • Assistant Professor, KSU
  • Melisa J. Hancock,
  • Teacher in Residence, KSU
  • Emily Finney
  • Teacher, Somewhere in CA

2004 NCTM Annual ConventionPhiladelphia, PA
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com