Title: Behavioural Finance
1Behavioural Finance
- Lecture 11
- Out of Sequence
- Extending Endogenous Money
2Recap
- Last week we built model of pure credit economy
- Pure credit economy can be self-sustaining
- Single initial loan causes sustained economic
activity - Positive bank balances, incomes
3This week
- Extending model to include production
- Explaining values of parameters
- Expanding model to include growth
- Applying the model
- Working out why lenders tend to lend too much
money - Modelling a credit crunch
4Production
- Actual production involves
- Multiple commodities used to produce each other
- Factories (fixed capital) Machinery that
- Transforms inputs
- E.g, blast furnace
- Iron Ore Coal in, Steel out
- Depreciates in use
- Circulating capital (Marxs term)
- Goods used up entirely in producing output
- Raw materials, energy, intermediate goods (e.g.,
rivets become part of car) - Many types of labour (skilled, unskilled,
supervisors)
5Modelling Production
- Economic models of production
- Basic Neoclassical factors of production
- Labour Capital InGoods Out
- Numerous problems with this
- Shown to be invalid in Cambridge Controversies
over the nature of capital - Ignored (or not even known) by most neoclassical
economists - See History of Economic Thought lecture
- Chapter 6 of Debunking Economics
6Modelling Production
- Advanced Neoclassical
- General Equilibrium
- Multiple goods as inputs, multiple goods as
outputs - Better than Factors of production fallacy
- But problems with assumption that economy in
continuous equilibrium - See History of Economic Thought lecture
- Chapter 8 of Debunking Economics
- Post-Keynesian
- Most are dynamic (good!)
- Use abstraction of single commodity output,
constant ratio between labour input GDP output
(not so good, but not as bad as neoclassical
factor of production models)
7Modelling Production
- Sraffian
- Based on work of Piero Sraffa
- Developer of critique of neoclassical factor of
production model - Model production as multiple goods as inputs
producing multiple goods as output (very good) - But work in equilibrium (very bad)
- Model of production used here
- Dynamic with abstraction of single commodity
(Very good) - Labour inGDP out (Not so good)
- But later expanded to multiple goods in, multiple
goods out
8Absolutely Basic Modelling of Production
- Start with
- Single Output (Q or GDP)
- Labour input L
- Constant labour productivity (a) so that
- Q a.L
- Constant money wage W
- Link between monetary model developed last
lecture - And physical output
- Is Price (P)
- Have to work out a dynamic equation for price
9Absolutely Basic Modelling of Production
- In equilibrium, price must just enable flow of
demand to purchase flow of output - Flow of output is
- Q a.L
- L equals flow of wages divided by wage rate
- From last weeks lecture, flow of wages is
Workers share of surplus generated in production
Balance in Firm sectors deposit account
Time lag between financing production and
receiving sales revenue
10Absolutely Basic Modelling of Production
- So Labour employed L is this flow divided by the
wage rate W
- Physical output Q is then labour employed L
multiplied by labour productivity a
- Physical demand (D) is the monetary flow of
demand divided by the price level P - Monetary flow of demand is
11Absolutely Basic Modelling of Production
- So demand in physical units per year is this
divided by price level P
- When economy is in equilibrium, flow of supply
will equal flow of demand
- We can now solve for what Price would be in
equilibrium
Cancel
Cancel
Cancel
Cancel
12Absolutely Basic Modelling of Production
- So in equilibrium, price is a markup on the
monetary cost of production
Money wage per worker divided by units of output
per worker is the cost of production per unit
produced
Markup 1/(1-s) is bigger than 1
- Price as a markup on cost of production means
that - Prices convert the physical surplus into a
monetary one - Basic dynamic price equation consistent with this
is
Relation in Equilibrium
Time lag in price setting
Rate of change of prices
13Absolutely Basic Modelling of Production
- Minimum production system is therefore
- Monetary-production model is
- This physical system
- Coupled with previous monetary flows table
14A monetary model of production
Financial sector as derived from table of flows
Price system
Labour-based production
- Simulation shows system describes viable pure
credit economy
15A monetary model of production
- Monetary physical systems consistent in
equilibrium - But convergence to equilibrium takes time
- Original monetary flows only model
- Expanded monetary flows, physical flows and price
model
16A monetary model of production
- Monetary estimates of profits
- Rate of surplus (s)
- Times Firm Deposit Account (FD)
- Divided by turnover rate (tS)
- Converges over time to equal physical estimate
- Price times Quantity minus Costs (Wages only
here) - Ditto monetary estimate of wages
- One minus rate of surplus (1-s)
- Times Firm Deposit Account (FD)
- Divided by turnover rate (tS)
- Converges over time to
- Wage rate times Labour
17A monetary model of production
- Taking stock so far Combining
- Circuit insights into nature of credit money and
- Basic approach to dynamic modelling
- Has yielded working model of the circular flow
- Not just a diagram
- But working model of monetary and physical flows
- No hassles about assuming equilibrium, etc.
- Next stages
- Explain parameter values
- Allow for growth and
- Beginnings of behaviour (rather than fixed
parameters)
18Parameter Values and Time Lags
- Values used for parameters may seem strange
- w26 for workers consumption
- b1 for bankers consumption
- Full list of values is
- Interest rates based on long run averages
- Loan minus deposit rates normally 4
- Rate of surplus turnover arbitrary but generate
income shares close to actual data - Other 4 parameters (w, b, LR, RR) are inverse
time lags - Time lag tells how long a process would take to
reach its equilibrium if it continued linearly
19Parameter Values and Time Lags
- Consider just consumption by workers
- Equation for outflow from account is
- Solve this via integration
- Slope of tangent to this curve is
20Parameter Values and Time Lags
- Equation of tangent to curve at t0 is
- Equals zero at t1/w (in workers case, 1/26th of
a year)
- Time lag for workers consumption is 1/26th of a
year - Shown as tw1/26 in future
21Parameter Values and Time Lags
- Time where tangent to curve crosses equilibrium
value of function is the time lag of the
function, expressed as fractions of the time unit
(here, years)
22Parameter Values and Time Lags
- Lets us interpret w as number of times a year
workers turnover their accounts - Workers spend their wages 26 times a year
- w 26
- And express consumption by workers as a time lag
- Time lag for workers consumption is 1/26th of a
year - tW 1/26
- So consumption from household accounts can be
shown as
- In practice, time lag version used, since it
expresses behaviour in fractions of basic time
unit of a year
or
where w 26
where tw 1/26
23Parameter Values and Time Lags
- So the various strange parameter values mean
- Time lags used from now on to better specify
models
24Growth
- Model so far shows that
- Keynes was right sustained economic activity can
be maintained with fixed stock of money as
revolving fund of finance - Capitalists can borrow money make a profit
- Debt easily repaid
- Circuit conclusions about viability of economy
without rising injections of money based on
errors in dynamics - Next stage how does money grow endogenously?
- Insight from Basil Moore
- Firms finance operations by lines of credit
- Create new money if access line of credit
- AND debt grows by same amount
25Growth
- Easily incorporated by new row
- Both debt and firm deposits grow by same amount
- Both assets and liabilities of banking sector
expand
26Growth
- Relate to level of Firm Deposits
- J FD/tNM
- Set tNM 20 Money doubles every 20 years
- Outcome is self-sustaining growth
27Growth
- Ditto for physical economy
- Circuitist insight that money and banking must be
included in a model of capitalism - Combined with dynamics
- Could be the Holy Grail that enables capitalism
to be modelled accurately - Next extensionvariable wages employment
28Variable wages
- Raises the vexed issue of the Phillips Curve
- Alleged statistical relationship between
- Level of unemployment and
- Rate of change of money wages
- Massively misinterpreted in literature
textbooks - Phillips was actually a systems engineer
- Using 1950s version of technology shown here
- Tried to introduce these methods to economics
- Misinterpreted and derided as Hydraulic
Keynesianism - Objective to introduce dynamics into economics!
29The Phillips Model
- RECOMMENDATIONS for stabilising aggregate
production and employment have usually been
derived from the analysis of multiplier models,
using the method of comparative statics. - This type of analysis does not provide a very
firm basis for policy recommendations, for two
reasons. - First, the time path of income, production and
employment during the process of adjustment is
not revealed. It is quite possible that certain
types of policy may give rise to undesired
fluctuations, or even cause a previously stable
system to become unstable, although the final
equilibrium position as shown by a static
analysis appears to be quite satisfactory. - Second, the effects of variations in prices and
interest rates cannot be dealt with adequately
with the simple multiplier models which usually
form the basis of the analysis. (Phillips 1954
290)
30The Phillips Model
- Phillips built a dynamic model using flowchart
showed one variable (e.g., unemployment)
affecting rate of change of another (e.g., money
wages)
- As part of model, postulated nonlinear
relationship between output and wage/capital
price inflation
Level of D
Rate of change of P
31The Phillips Model
- We may therefore postulate a relationship
between the level of production and the rate of
change of factor prices, which is probably of the
form shown in Fig. 11 (308)
- Did research that led to Phillips curve to
justify this part of his dynamic model, using
19th century UK data
32The Phillips Curve
- Found a clear tendency for
- inverse relation between U and rate of change of
money wages (Dwm) - Dwm above curve when U falling, and vice-versa
- Fitted exponential curve to data
33The Phillips Curve
Deviations from trend because of
Fitted through average wage change U for
0-2,2-3,3-4, 4-5,5-7,7-11 unemployment
Wage-price spiral due to wars falling U
Rising unemployment
34The Phillips Curve fitted to 1913-1948 data
Rapid rise in U 13 fall in M prices cost of
living agreements
War-induced rise in M prices
35The Phillips Curve
- Economists didnt comprehend Phillips on dynamics
- Instead, latched onto trade-off, static
interpretation of unemployment-wage rise
relationship - Proposition that policy makers could choose an
unemployment-inflation pair became part of
orthodox Keynesianism - Unfortunately, static relation didnt seem to
hold - Keynesian economics discredited by this
- But employment-wage change relation common to all
schools of economics - Still used in neoclassical static models
- Here introduced as Phillips intendedas part of
dynamic model
36Variable wages
- Basic Phillips curve introduced here
- Advanced Phillips curve should include all 3
influences Phillips noted - Level of unemployment (highly nonlinear)
- Rate of change of unemployment
- Rate of change of retail prices operating
through cost of living adjustments in wage rates
when retail prices are forced up by a very rapid
rise in import prices or agricultural
products. Economica 1958 p. 283-4 - Function fitted to employment rate rather than
unemployment - A generalised exponential function
37Variable wages
- Exponential function is y(x) ex (where e
2.718)
- Generalised version which
- can place an exponential curve anywhere on the
x-y axis - control the slope
Slope at that point
(x,y) pair curve goes through
Minimum value
- Dont worry about the details
- Fitted to Phillipss UK data the values for this
are
38Variable wages
- Employmentmoney wage change function is
- Other elements of reality introduced now
- Rising population
- Rising labour productivity
- Still a very basic model, but first truly
monetary circular flow model ever
39Variable wages
Looks complicated, but if you understood the
table of financial flows, you understand this
- Financial system as before
- Prices a lagged adjustment to markup on cost of
production
- Employment Flow of money wages divided by money
wage
Prices
Employment
- Output Employment times productivity
Output
Exponential growth in productivity and population
- Change in money wage a nonlinear reaction to
employment rate
Employment Rate
Money Wage
40Basic Circular Flow Model
- Model still skeletal
- Basic entities in economy
- Financial accounts
- Firms
- Workers
- Relationships between them
- Interest Debt payments
- Wages and consumption
- But only one muscle
- Worker response to level of employment
- Much more needed for adequate model
41Basic Circular Flow Model
- Firm response to rate of profit
- Speculation rather than investment
- Variations in consumption due to economic
conditions, etc. - But interesting results even from skeleton
- Non-neutrality of money
- Higher money creationlower unemployment
- Persistent inflation possible
- Deflation if rate of money creation drops
- Can also ask the model policy questions (shown
later)
42Basic Circular Flow Model
43Policy (1) Should lenders be controlled?
- What happens to bank income if
- Rate of new money creation speeds up
- Rate of relending existing reserves accelerates
- Rate of repayment of existing loans drops?
- Changing lending parameters by factor of 2
triples bank income - Banks have inherent bias to providing as much
debt as possible - As endogenous money theorists assert
44Policy (2) Can a credit crunch cause a recession?
- 3 key financial parameters altered by factor of 2
- Crunch causes temporary rise in unemployment AND
sustained higher level - Inflation turns to deflation and then lower
sustained rate of inflation
45Policy (3) Best way to fight a credit crunch?
- Standard multiplier model policy
- Obama explaining his economic policy, April 2009
- there are a lot of Americans who understandably
think that government money would be better spent
going directly to families and businesses instead
of banks wheres our bailout?, they ask. - the truth is that a dollar of capital in a bank
can actually result in eight or ten dollars of
loans to families and businesses, a multiplier
effect that can ultimately lead to a faster pace
of economic growth. (page 3 of speech) - Simulation 100 billion injection 1 year after
crunch - (a) Boost banks reserves
- (b) Boost firms (debtors) deposits
46Policy (3) Best way to fight a credit crunch?
47Policy (3) Best way to fight a credit crunch?
- Stimulus inflow of 100 billion for one year
after crunch - Modelled as a pulse
- Takes value of 100 (billion) for a year after
crunch till two years after - No consideration yet of how government money
created
48Policy (3) Best way to fight a credit crunch?
- Stimulus inflow of 100 billion for one year
after crunch
- Outcome opposite of money multiplier prediction
- Better to give stimulus to debtors than banks
- Reason higher rate of turnover
- Funds injected into BR flow out slowly
- Funds injected into FD flow out quickly
- Higher rate of turnovergreater impact from
stimulus
49Conclusion
- Circuit model still skeletal
- But already reaches different economic policy
results to standard models - Next week
- The Financial Instability Hypothesis