Obstacles to Subsidy Reform in the Energy Sector - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Obstacles to Subsidy Reform in the Energy Sector

Description:

At least $16 billion in new subsidies to energy sectors. Little use of price system (fees) to ... Vastly improved access to reports, data via the internet. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: DK8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Obstacles to Subsidy Reform in the Energy Sector


1
Obstacles to Subsidy Reformin the Energy Sector
  • OECD Technical Expert Meeting on
  • Environmentally Harmful Subsidies
  • 3-4 November 2003
  • Paris, France

Doug Koplow Earth Track, Inc. 2067 Massachusetts
Avenue, 4th Floor Cambridge, MA 02140 (617)
661-4700 DKoplow_at_earthtrack.net
2
Subsidy Reform in the Energy Sector How are We
Doing
  • Not very well. Current energy bill has
  • At least 16 billion in new subsidies to energy
    sectors.
  • Little use of price system (fees) to
    differentiate supplies with different security
    profiles (e.g., Strategic Petroleum Reserve,
    nuclear site safety).
  • Removal on many checks and balances associated
    with exploitation of energy resources on public
    lands.
  • Over the past 15 years
  • Recognition that subsidies are not just cash.
  • Improved tracking of aggregate lending, insurance
    subsidies in US, though linkage to beneficiaries
    remains poor.
  • Vastly improved access to reports, data via the
    internet.
  • Numerous attempts to curb new and old subsidies
    unsuccessful.

3
Other People's Views (1)
  • Survey respondents shared general pessimism on
    lack of progress.
  • "I know I don't like them subsidies, but I have
    yet to discover that silver political bullet that
    would allow us to overcome the 'concentrated
    benefits, diffuse costs' angle."
  • "subsidies tend to gravitate to the largest,
    most-well-connected recipients."
  • "The natural resource extraction interests have
    entrenched decision makers in the US House and
    the Senate, as well as the administration that
    will back the needs of the natural resources
    industry, despite the environmental and fiscal
    impacts of the subsidy or program."

4
Other People's Views (2)
  • "Our work had little impact as best I can tell"
  • "Subsidies for energy are usually driven by
    non-energy objectives and are usually highly
    politicized and difficult to remove."
  • "In terms of subsidy reform hard to identify an
    actual subsidy that was removed."
  • "The government does not know what and where the
    subsidies are (and has little real incentive to
    find out)."
  • "The fundamental barriers to reform are always
    the perceived interests of key players."

5
What's Behind the Lack of Progress?
  • Rent seeking
  • Symbolic and instrumental politics
  • Supporting factors to subsidy perpetuation
  • Fragmentation, lack of standardization of subsidy
    data
  • Concentrated benefits/diffuse costs
  • Skewed checks and balances regulation vs. fiscal
    policy.
  • Mis-defining the solution.

6
Rent Seeking Cash is Still King
  • Political entrepreneurship the powerful get the
    subsidies and reinvest in the political process
    to keep them.
  • Objective is to increase expected returns not
    just about immediate cash.
  • Special loans/tax breaks, or risk shifting to the
    public can be equally attractive and often less
    visible.
  • Concentrated benefits/diffuse costs coalitions
    to oppose hard to assemble, maintain.
  • Avoid transparency this reduces the cost of
    opposition.
  • Survey respondents politics, not economics,
    main barrier to more rationale policies.

And cash equivalents.
7
Symbolic vs. Instrumental Politics (Edelman)
  • Symbolic - selling and defending policies.
  • Poverty alleviation, regional development.
  • Industrial development, new industries, millions
    of new jobs.
  • Achieving energy security/independence.
  • Instrumental - actual resource transfers policies
    generate.
  • Reducing risk/increasing returns for
    well-connected private investors or industries.
  • Delivering jobs or pork to legislative districts.
  • "Members of Congress have spent the past three
    years negotiating the resolution of difficult,
    regional issues in the bill."
  • -Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
    press release, October 22, 2003.

8
Data Fragmentation Inconsistency
  • Fragmented sources
  • Scores of agencies/ministries per country provide
    subsidies to energy sector.
  • Budget data can't easily be sorted topically.
  • Inadequate processing of existing data to support
    subsidy analysis
  • Spending on general programs rarely allocated
    back to beneficiary groups (e.g., muni bonds,
    waterways).
  • Estimation/valuation methods often lack
    transparency (e.g., tax expenditures), generating
    large variance. Estimates rarely checked by ex
    post analysis.
  • International data sets often aggregated "as
    reported" by member nations (e.g., IEA energy RD
    database).

9
Comparing Regulatory and Fiscal Oversight in the
US
  • Existing checks and balances often institute
    stringent controls over regulatory activities,
    lax controls over fiscal activities.

10
Mis-defining the Solution
  • Cooption. Subsidies for the "new" players (e.g.,
    renewables) help pass legislation, but often
    worsen the relative economics for these less
    powerful sectors.
  • Small steps should not be seen as big steps.
    "Environmental fiscal reform" and "eco-taxes"
    don't even exist until existing fees meet three
    baseline recovery conditions
  • Recover costs, including opportunity cost of
    capital.
  • Match baseline taxes of the wider economy.
  • Internalize reasonable estimates for
    environmental/health externalities.
  • "Final" steps to reform can be challenging.
    Transitional subsidies may be necessary for a
    reform package, but are ripe for political
    gaming.

11
Path to Reform Doug's 5-Step Program
  • (1) Identify subsidies qualitatively.
  • (2) Describe subsidies qualitatively.
  • (3) Quantify transfer associated with the
    subsidies.
  • (4) Quantify the impacts of these transfers.
  • (5) Model potential subsidy reform.
  • Take steps in order. Not all are needed prior to
    subsidy reform/removal, but each helps strengthen
    the case.
  • Expect resistance at all stages fiercest
    political battles likely around increased
    transparency.
  • "Publish them subsidies relentlessly. Make
    proponents defend them. The wrong folks are too
    often on the defensive politically"
  • -Leading US Energy Policy Expert

12
Conditions For Reform (1)
  • Policy windows multiple factors do sometimes
    align to make reform possible. To capitalize on
    these, the baseline subsidy data/metrics must
    already be in place.
  • Coalitions must be wide. Environmental interests
    alone are generally insufficient fiscal
    interests often needed.
  • Must be able to show benefits of reform more
    quickly and more completely than is currently the
    case.
  • Plan ahead to deal with transitory costs through
    more narrowly targeted programs.

13
Conditions for Reform (2)
  • Reciprocity/tax shift Reinvesting fiscal
    savings from reform strategically into reducing
    other burdens (e.g., taxes on labor) can broaden
    support for change.
  • Stem the tide of new subsidies critical to
    long-term success of reform.
  • Mandatory sunset provisions.
  • Parity with regulatory policy Subsidy impact
    assessments to assess environmental/economic harm
    prior to legislating.
  • Integrated costing of different types of
    subsidies.
  • Much clearer tracking of recipients (at least by
    industrial sector), to increase the political
    costs of subsidization to recipients.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com