Title: WORKING TO BRINGING THE VOICES OF MARGINALIZED WOMEN INTO SOCIAL POLICIES AND DEBATES
1WORKING TO BRINGING THE VOICES OF MARGINALIZED
WOMEN INTO SOCIAL POLICIES AND DEBATES
- Jo-Anne Lee and Lise Martin
- CANADIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT
OF WOMEN - Updated June 6, 2006
2CRIAWS APPROACH
- LINKAGES BETWEEN COMMUNITY AND UNIVERSITY BASED
RESEARCH EVOLVING SINCE 1976 - IN 2004, CRIAW MADE A STRATEGIC DECISION TO FOCUS
ITS WORK ON WOMENS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
OVERCOMING POVERTY AND EXCLUSION (WESJOPE)
3CONTEXT OF WORK
- CRIAW IS INVOLVED IN INTEGRATING MARGINALIZED
WOMENS VOICES. WE HAVE TO BE READY TO TRULY HEAR
THEIR VOICES - CRIAW IS COMMITTED TO FACILITATING WOMENS VOICES
IN THE POLICY PROCESS, EG. THE CANADA SOCIAL
TRANSFER (CST) RESEARCH PROJECT AND OUR LOCAL
CONSULTATIONS
4OUR JOURNEY
- ORGANIZATIONAL/CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
- CONCEPTUALIZE INTERSECTIONAL FEMINIST FRAMEWORKS
(IFFS) FOR POLICY CHANGE - DEVELOP METHODS FOR INCLUDING MARGINALIZED
WOMENS VOICES IN CHANGING POLICIES - CONCEPTUALIZE WOMENS ECONOMIC SECURITY AND
SOCIAL JUSTICE FROM THE LIVES OF WOMEN MOST
AFFECTED
5MAIN FORCES FOR CHANGE
- BOARD OF CRIAW DECIDED INTERNAL ORGANIZATIONAL
CHANGES WERE NEEDED TO ENABLE VOICES OF
MARGINALIZED WOMEN TO BE HEARD AND FOR TARGETTED
AND FOCUSED WORK TO OCCUR - THE STATE PUSHED FOR GREATER RELEVANCE FOR POLICY
CHANGE - PUSH FROM STAFF AND SOME BOARD MEMBERS FOR CRIAW
TO STAY RELEVANT (NOT ALL AGREED).
6WHERE WE ARE NOW
- OVER THREE DECADES, CRIAW HAS SHIFTED FROM MAINLY
PUBLISHING, TO UNDERTAKING PLURAL RESEARCH
PROJECTS, AND NOW TO A MORE FOCUSED AND ACTIVIST
RESEARCH AGENDA. - DIFFICULT CHOICES HAD TO BE MADE ISSUES FOR
FOCUS, VOICES TO BE PRIORITIZED, AND TARGET
AUDIENCES.
7POINTS FOR REFLECTION
- STATE MEDIATION, POLITICAL STRUGGLE, OR A
CONVERGENCE OF THE TWO? - ARE WOMEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ORGANIZATIONS TRULY
READY TO INTEGRATE THE VOICES OF THOSE MOST
AFFECTED INTO THEIR WORK? WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR
ADVOCACY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE GROUPS?
8WHY IFFS?
- NEED TO MOVE BEYOND GENDER BASED ANALYSIS (GBA)
AND GENDER MAINSTREAMING - NEED TO BETTER RESPOND TO COMPLEXITIES OF
MARGINALIZED WOMENS LIVES - PATRIARCHY AND SEX DISCRIMINATION ONLY ONE ENTRY
POINT - LONGSTANDING ANALYSIS OF INTERSECTIONALITY OF
RACE, CLASS AND GENDER IN LITERATURE, BUT LITTLE
WORK DONE AT THE POLICY LEVEL
9CRIAWS STARTING POINTS
- IN DEVELOPING OUR STRATEGIC PLAN, AROUND WOMENS
ECONOMIC SECURITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, CRIAW
DECIDED THAT ALL OUR WORK WOULD TAKE PLACE WITHIN
AN INTERSECTIONAL FEMINIST FRAMEWORK. BUT WHAT
DID THIS MEAN FOR POLICY ANALYSIS AND CHANGE?
THEORY HAD NOT BEEN TRANSLATED INTO USABLE
PRACTICE. - MANY ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORKS EXISTED.
- CRIAW SET OUT TO ASK WOMEN HOW THEY UNDERSTAND
AND USE INTERSECTIONAL FEMINIST ANALYSIS IN THEIR
WORK.
10MORE STARTING POINTS
- WOMEN HAVE SUBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE OF THEIR OWN
LIVES AND THE CONTEXT IN WHICH THEY LIVE THEIR
LIVES - WOMEN LIVE THEIR LIVES HOLISTICALLY AND IN
RELATION TO THEIR ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL
NETWORKS. WOMEN DO NOT SEE THEMSELVES AS POLICY
OBJECTS. - WOMEN WANT TO BE CONSULTED, THEY WANT TO BE
INVOLVED IN POLICY MAKING - DIFFERENT WOMEN COULD BRING DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE
TO THE TABLE.
11OUR APPROACH
- IN FEBRUARY 2004 WE HELD A ROUNDTABLE WITH
CANADIAN FEMINIST ACTIVISTS AND WOMEN FROM THE
SOUTH ON INTEGRATED FEMINIST ANALYSIS (IFA), - IN MARCH, 2005, WE TOOK A DRAFT TO BEIJING 10
AND HELD A WORKSHOP ON MOVING BEYOND GBA IN
COLLABORATION WITH THE WOMENS INTERNATIONAL
COALITION FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL JUSTICE WITH
80 WOMEN ACTIVISTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD, - IN JUNE, 2005, WE HELD A THINKTANK WITH 20
ACADEMIC AND COMMUNITY BASED PARTICIPANTS. - WE ESTABLISHED A CRIAW WORKING GROUP ON IFFS.
12FROM INTEGRATED FEMINST ANALYSIS TO
INTERSECTIONAL FEMINIST FRAMEWORKS
13THE CONCEPT OF MULTIPLE IFFS
- BEGINS FROM A MORAL AND ETHICAL POSITION
- ISSUES OF LANGUAGE ARE IMPORTANT
- APPROACHES TO KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION
- ISSUES OF CO-IMPLICATION
- POLITICS OF IDENTITY BALANCED AGAINST MATERIAL,
STRUCTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXTS.
14HOW IFFS LINK TO WOMENS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
JUSTICE
- USE IFFS TO GUIDE WORK ON OVERCOMING POVERTY
AND EXCLUSION. THIS WORK WILL FURTHER INFORM THE
DEVELOPMENT OF IFFS - DIFFERENT GROUPS OF WOMEN WILL HAVE DIFFERENT
HISTORIES AND ENGAGEMENTS WITH THE STATE, ECONOMY
AND CIVIL SOCIETY, IFFS MAKE THESE DIFFERENCES
EXPLICIT - NOT ALL WOMENS ISSUES OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
JUSTICE CAN BE RESOLVED BY UNIVERSAL CHANGES IN
LABOR MARKET OR SOCIAL WELFARE POLICIES.
TRADITIONAL APPROACHES SUCH AS PAY EQUITY,
INCREASED LABOR MARKET PARTICIPATION OR
ATTACHMENT WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESOLVE ISSUES OF
SOCIAL EXCLUSION AND POVERTY. - THE LOCAL AND GLOBAL ARE LINKED AND IFFS SHOULD
HELP TO MAKE THESE RELATIONS TRANSPARENT
15SOME CONCRETE ACTIONS WE WILL TAKE TO LINK POLICY
ANALYSIS, ACTION AND RESEARCH
- FIND AND DEVELOP STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS
- BUILD SOLIDARITY IN POLITICAL VISION AND ACTION
- ENSURE THAT VOICES OF WOMEN MOST AFFECTED ARE
PRESENT IN DECISION-MAKING - USE COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH APPROACHES SUCH AS
PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH
16SOME CONCRETE ACTIONS WE WILL TAKE TO LINK POLICY
ANALYSIS, ACTION AND RESEARCH
- USE AND DEVELOP IFFS AS A FRAMEWORK FOR POLICY
ANALYSIS AND CHANGE - LINK POVERTY, SOCIAL EXCLUSION, MARGINALIZATION
AND SUBORDINATION IN RESEARCH, ANALYSIS AND
POLICY CHANGE
17SOME CONCRETE ACTIONS WE WILL TAKE TO LINK IFFS
TO WESJOPE POLICY ANALYSIS, ACTION AND RESEARCH
- LOOK FOR WOMEN-CENTERED ECONOMIC MODELS,
- ENCOURAGE COMMUNITY LEVEL ORGANIZING, MOBILIZING
AND EMPOWERMENT BY LEVERAGING INFLUENCE AND
FUNDS, - LEARN AND LISTEN TO KNOWLEDGE BEING DEVELOPED BY
WOMEN FROM THE SOUTH, - SHARE KNOWLEDGE WIDELY THROUGH POPULAR EDUCATION,
- CONTINUE TO LEARN
18THE WORK AHEAD
- MUCH WORK REMAINS TO BE DONE
- THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS WILL
CONTINUE TO ARISE - CHALLENGE OF INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES AND HOW TO
EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS - WE MUST SHIFT OUR LENSES, INCLUDING HOW WE
CONCEIVE OF AND DOCUMENT THE PROCESS OF OUR
SUBSTANTIVE WORK.