Title: An Evaluation of the Age and Sex Data from the Census Population of Canada, Provinces and Territorie
1An Evaluation of the Age and Sex Data from the
Census Population of Canada,Provinces and
Territories, 1971 to 2001
- BY
- Shirley Loh, Ravi Verma and Margaret Michalowski
- Prepared for presentation at the Canadian
Population Society Annual Meetings, Winnipeg,
Manitoba, June 2004. This paper reports the
results of research and analysis undertaken by
Demography Division, Statistics Canada staff. It
reflects the opinions of the authors and, not
necessarily, those of Statistics Canada and is
released to inform and to encourage discussion.
2Outline of Presentation
- Objectives Review of literature
- Methodology
- Pyramid, Digit Preference Index,
- Age-Sex Accuracy index
- Source of Data
- Results
- Conclusion and Discussion
3Objectives and Review of literature
- Objectives
- To investigate if age heaping is present in
single year age data on population - To examine the overall accuracy of population
data by age and sex - To compare the level of accuracy of age-sex
population with some countries - Review of Literature
- Norland, Litven and Cottrell (1977)
- Bourbeau and Lebel (2000)
- Poston and associates (2003)
4Methodology
- Graphical presentation of population by age and
sex - Computing Myers indices for detecting digit
preference in single year age reporting - Computing age-sex accuracy index (U.N. Method)
based on 5 year age group
5Myers Index(unadjusted)
6U.N. Method for Age-Sex Accuracy(Unadjusted,
Canada, 1971)
Criteria of the U.N. INDEX Under 20 ?
Accurate 20 to 40 ? Inaccurate Over 40
? Highly Inaccurate
7Source of Data
- Census population by age and sex, adjusted for
net census undercount, 1971-2001
8Results Myers' Index of Age Heaping by Sex,
Unadjusted Census Population, Canada(Age
Interval 20-69)
9Results (contd) Myers Index of Age Heaping,
Canada, Provinces and Territories
10Results (contd) United Nations Age-sex Accuracy
Index, Canada, Provinces and Territories
Accurate Inaccurate Highly
Inaccurate
11Limitations of the UN Age-sex Accuracy Index
(Siegel and Swanson, 2004)
- Central age group not included in the calculation
of the age ratio - Expected decline in sex ratio with increasing age
not considered - Considerable weight is given to the sex ratio
component in the formula
12Results (contd) Revised Age-Sex Accuracy Index,
Canada, Provinces and Territories
Accurate Inaccurate Highly
Inaccurate
13Results (contd) Age-Sex Accuracy Index for
Canada in 2001 and for 42 Countries of the World
in 2000
based on unadjusted population
14Conclusion
- Myers Indices Single Year Age Data
- No preference or avoidance of any year of birth
- Age-sex Accuracy Indices Five Year Age Group
Data - Accurate age-sex population data for Canada and
all provinces except Prince Edward Island, Yukon
and Northwest Territories - The quality of Canadian age-sex population data
is highly comparable to Sweden and Finland - Unadjusted Census Population Myers indices and
age-sex accuracy indices slightly higher than
those based on adjusted census population
15Discussion
- No explanation provided by the United Nations for
the classification of the three categories - Did the introduction of question on date of birth
in 1971 improve the quality of age-heaping?