Planning Reading Assessment, Goals, and Interventions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 92
About This Presentation
Title:

Planning Reading Assessment, Goals, and Interventions

Description:

No one set of instructional activities will address the needs of all the ... Diagnostic On the Quick Phonics Screener (QPS), her scores were: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 93
Provided by: debora63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planning Reading Assessment, Goals, and Interventions


1
Planning Reading Assessment, Goals, and
Interventions
  • Linking Reading Interventions to Assessment
  • and State Standards
  • for Elementary Students

2
The Big Ideas of Reading Instruction
  • Phonemic Awareness
  • Phonics
  • Fluency
  • Vocabulary
  • Text Comprehension

3
What Makes a Big Ideaa Big Idea?
  • A Big Idea is
  • Predictive of reading acquisition and later
    reading achievement.
  • Something we can do something about, i.e.,
    something we can teach.
  • Something that improves outcomes for children
    when we teach it

4
Letter Naming is not a Big Idea of Early Literacy
  • Problems with learning to quickly and accurately
    name the letters is predictive of later reading
    difficulty
  • However, letter naming is not a powerful
    instructional target, and this is why it is not a
    Big Idea (doesnt meet 3)
  • Students need to receive core curriculum
    instruction in letter naming, but additional work
    in this area is not very helpful

5
Alignment of State Standards
  • Essential Components of Reading
  • Phonemic Awareness
  • Phonics
  • Fluency
  • Vocabulary
  • Comprehension
  • Benchmarks within the State Reading Standard
  • Alphabetics
  • Fluency
  • Vocabulary
  • Comprehension

6
Interventions should be organized in tiers
Three-tier model of reading instruction and
intervention (Multi-Tier System of
SupportsMTSS)
7
Interventions Should Be Organized in Tiers
Tier 1 About 80 of students general education
curriculum
Tier 2 About 10 to 15 of students targeted
small group interventions
Tier 3 About 5 of students intensive very small
group or individualized interventions
8
Types of Assessment to establish student needs
  • Screening to identify students who may need extra
    help (move to another tier)
  • Diagnostics to determine their specific
    instructional needs (planning the specific
    intervention)
  • Progress Monitoring to determine if students are
    making adequate progress within their current
    instructional environment (current intervention
    or current tier placement)

9
TIER I Core class instruction
Tier I is comprised of three elements
Core reading program
Benchmark testing of students to determine
instructional needs at least three times a year
Ongoing professional development
10
Key Components of Effective Tier 1
  • Increased allocation of instructional time to
    critical elements of reading
  • Quality of instructional time (e.g., high rates
    of student engagement, low rates of wasted
    instructional time)
  • Professional development that increases teacher
    content knowledge
  • Conducting scheduled progress monitoring and
    actually using results to plan instruction

11
TIER II Supplemental instruction
Tier II is small-group supplemental instruction
in addition to the time allotted for core reading
instruction.
Tier II includes programs, strategies, and
procedures designed and employed to supplement,
enhance, and support Tier I.
12
Key Components of Effective Tier 2
  • Focus on instruction in the alphabetic code
  • How to hear sounds in words
  • How to represent sounds with letters
  • How to look at a string of letters and generate
    the sounds that produce words
  • How to manipulate sounds in words to produce new
    words

13
Second Tier Research Outcomes
  • No one set of instructional activities will
    address the needs of all the students needing
    supplemental support
  • Second tier instruction can distinguish readers
    who lack preparatory skills from those with
    reading difficulties

14
Second Tier Research Outcomes
  • Even the most successful interventions do not
    prevent some readers from struggling again later
  • Some students are likely to have difficulty with
    fluency even after all word decoding skills have
    been remediated
  • Improvement through early intervention is not a
    cure for reading disabilities, but it can
    increase future reading skill levels

15
TIER III Intensive intervention
Tier III is intense, explicit, strategic, and
structured supplemental instruction, provided in
very small groups or in one-on-one settings.
Tier III materials may be supplemental to core or
a replacement curriculum.
16
Key Components of Effective Tier 3
  • Purposeful instructional design and delivery
  • Explicit and consistent teacher language
  • Multiple, careful modeling of tasks
  • Careful sequencing of skill introduction
  • Ample opportunities to practice and receive
    corrective feedback
  • Systematic and cumulative review of previously
    learned skills
  • Purposeful integration of previously learned
    skills in support of more advanced skill learning

17
Key Components of Effective Tier 3
  • Prioritized content
  • Phonological skills of isolation, blending, and
    segmentation
  • Alphabetic code skills and strategies
  • Protected time and grouping
  • Frequent performance monitoring that is used to
    plan instruction

18
Based on a students response to interventions
and assessment results
Increasing customization of the intervention
19
Degree of Customization
  • Tier One core curriculum
  • Tier Two supplemental materials
  • Standard Protocol
  • Individualized student problem-solving
    interventions
  • Tier Three and SPED structured, intense, and
    explicit instruction, whether alternative
    curriculum or individualized supplemental
    materials

20
Degree of Customization in Reading Across Tiers
  • Tier One 90 minutes uninterrupted instruction
  • Tier Two Tier One 30 minutes targeted
    instruction
  • Tier Three Tier One 60 minutes highly
    structured, intense, and explicit instruction
  • Special Education Individualized IEP team
    decision.

21
Some unfortunate findings from previous reading
research
  • Only 1 child in 8 of those in the bottom quartile
    in word reading ability at the end of first grade
    reach grade-level reading skills by fourth grade.
  • Special education tends to prevent students from
    falling further behind. It does not reduce the
    gap in their reading skills compared to their
    peers.

22
Research about Interventions
  • To remediate reading difficulties, instruction
    must be more intense and more explicit than
    classroom instruction, and it must be systematic.
  • Intervention must come early, when the student
    first begins to exhibit indicators of later
    reading problems. Prevention of reading
    difficulties is much more cost effective than
    remediation.

23
Intense Instruction
  • Increase intensity by
  • Increasing instructional time
  • Providing instruction in very small groups (3 or
    4)

24
Issues related to deciding to intensify support
  • When? (the earlier the better)
  • Whos going to do it?
  • How will we train personnel?
  • Scheduling
  • Progress monitoring
  • Treatment fidelity

25
Issues related to deciding to intensify support
  • Group Size (3-5 max)
  • Amount of time
  • Teaching and re-teaching
  • Extending skills
  • Instructional delivery
  • Explicit
  • Systematic teacher wording
  • Error correction
  • Prioritized content
  • Scaffolded support

26
Explicit Instruction
  • Carefully preplan materials and instruction
  • Provide direct instruction
  • Fast-paced
  • Highly focused
  • Many examples and prompts
  • Many opportunities to respond (with feedback)
  • Provide guided and independent practice

27
Systematic Instruction
  • Prioritize critical skills needed
  • Develop planned sequence for providing
    instruction in critical skills
  • Use research validated materials

28
Planning Instructional Support
  • In order to plan instruction, you need to answer
    these questions
  • What are the goals of instruction?
  • What specific skills need to be taught?
  • What instructional curriculum/program should we
    use?
  • What specific instructional strategies to use?
  • How much instructional support is needed?

29
Research-Based Curriculum Selection for Standard
Protocol
  • Review of reading core curriculum and
    supplemental materials available at Florida
    Center for Reading Research www.fcrr.org
  • Link from Project SPOT website www.projectspot.org

30
Essential Component 1
  • Phonemic Awareness
  • The ability to manipulate sounds
  • in spoken language

31
Clarification of terms
  • Phonemic Awareness
  • Identifying and working with individual phonemes
    (the smallest sound unit in spoken words)
  • Phonological Awareness
  • Identifying and working with larger sound units
    (e.g., rhyming words or onset and rime)

32
Skills Within Phonemic Awareness
  • Phoneme isolation
  • Phoneme identity
  • Phoneme categorization
  • Phoneme blending
  • Phoneme segmentation
  • Phoneme deletion
  • Phoneme addition
  • Phoneme substitution

33
Some Principles of Teaching Phonological/Phonemic
Awareness
  • Complexity varies within activities
  • Recognition is easier than recall
  • For example, Does sat rhyme with cat? is easier
    than asking What rhymes with cat?
  • Awareness of onset and rime is easier than
    individual phonemes
  • For example, when segmenting cat,
    c--at is easier than c--a--t

34
Some Principles of Teaching Phonological/Phonemic
Awareness
  • Words with fewer phonemes are easier
  • Continuant phonemes (e.g., s) are easier than
    non-continuant (e.g., p)
  • Phonemes in initial position are easier than
    phonemes in final position
  • Manipulatives are helpful (e.g., sound boxes)

35
Examples of Assessment ofPhonemic Awareness
  • Screening and Progress Monitoring
  • Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
    (DIBELS)
  • Initial Sound Fluency (ISF)
  • Phonemic Segmentation Fluency (PSF)
  • Diagnostic
  • Phonological Awareness Skills Test (PAST) by
    Zgonc, 2000 (in Sounds in Action)

36
Example Debbies assessment results (shes a
third grader)
  • DIBELS Debbies PSF score 10
  • Debbies PAST scores
  • Rhyme recognition 6/6
  • Rhyme production 6/6
  • Syllable blending 6/6
  • Syllable segmentation 5/6
  • Syllable deletion 5/6
  • Phoneme isolation initial sounds 5/6
  • Phoneme isolation final sounds 5/6
  • Phoneme blending 3/6
  • Phoneme segmentation 2/6
  • Deletion of Initial Sounds 0/6

37
ExamplePhonemic Segmentation Fluency
  • Goal
  • By the end of 36 weeks, given a phonemic
    segmentation probe, Debbie will score 35 correct
    phoneme segments.
  • Indicator
  • R1.1.1.4 Identifies and manipulates phonemes in
    spoken words (e.g., phoneme isolation,
    identification, categorization, blending,
    segmentation, deletion, addition, substitution.)

38
Intervention Notebook
  • Phonemic Awareness

39
  • Task 1
  • Find the phonemic awareness section in the
    intervention notebook. Based on the assessment
    results for Debbie, select an intervention that
    would be appropriate to use with her.
  • If the intervention was not successful, how could
    you increase the intensity and explicitness of
    the intervention?
  • Task 2
  • As a table group, discuss the following
    questions
  • Given this students assessment results, what
    Tier of intervention would be appropriate?
  • If Debbie were a student in your building, would
    she be placed in a specific curriculum, or would
    she receive a set of supplemental materials and
    activities (like the examples in the notebook)?

40
Essential Component 2
  • Phonics
  • The relationship between letters and sounds

41
Research on Phonics
  • Use a selected, useful set of letter-sound
    relationships
  • Introduce this set in a logical instructional
    sequence
  • Focus on application of phonetic skills
  • Practice application in both reading and writing

42
How much phonics?
  • All readers need systematic, explicit phonics
    instruction
  • Typical readers dont benefit from more beyond
    the core program
  • Low-skilled students need additional phonics
    instruction that includes
  • Specificity
  • Attention to mastery
  • Practice opportunities

43
Examples of Assessment of Phonics Knowledge
  • Screening and Progress Monitoring
  • DIBELS
  • Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)
  • Diagnostic
  • Quick Phonics Screener

44
DIBELSNonsense Word Fluency
  • NWF is criterion-related
  • A students current score on NWF moderates future
    expected growth (i.e., students at criterion
    wont grow as much as students below criterion)
  • The point is to get to the benchmark on timenot
    the highest score possible

45
Test and Teach Phonetic Analysis Differently
  • To assess student skill in phonetic analysis,
    stimuli are non-words
  • To teach alphabetic principle, teachers should
    use real words

46
Both quantitative and qualitative analysis of
performance is important
  • A students inability to engage in unitization on
    NWF is an early indicator of the students need
    for more customized intervention
  • Unitization means blending sounds together into
    larger units
  • baf baf (single unit)
  • or b-af (onset and rime)
  • not just b-a-f or b-a-f, baf

47
Both quantitative and qualitative analysis of
performance is important
  • The larger the unit the better the student was
    likely to perform on oral reading fluency in
    future grade levels.
  • Intervention to increase a students ability to
    unitize is difficult and requires intensity, but
    can prevent future problems with oral reading
    fluency

48
Example Julies phonics assessment results
  • Screening Julie is a 3rd grader. Her score on
    DIBELS Nonsense Words Fluency is 12 sounds.
  • Diagnostic On the Quick Phonics Screener (QPS),
    her scores were
  • 26/26 letters, 21/21 consonants, 5/5 vowels
  • 5/10 VC CVC in list, 5/20 in text
  • 0/10 CVCC CCVC in list, 0/10 in text

49
ExampleNonsense Word Fluency
  • Goal
  • In 36 instructional weeks, when given a one
    minute probe, Julie will score 50 on DIBELS
    nonsense word fluency.
  • Indicator
  • R 3.1.1.1 Uses decoding skills that include
    knowledge of structural analysis when reading
    unknown words.

50
Intervention Notebook
  • Phonics

51
  • Task 1
  • Based on the assessment information, find a
    phonics intervention appropriate for Julie.
  • If the intervention was not successful, how could
    you increase the intensity and explicitness of
    the intervention?
  • Task 2
  • As a table group, look at the interventions for
    phonics and discuss the following questions
  • Given this students assessment results, what
    Tier of support would be appropriate?
  • How does your building increase the customization
    of interventions to match student needs?

52
Essential Component 3
  • Fluency
  • The ability to read text accurately and
  • quickly, with expression

53
Why Is Fluency Important?
  • Fluent readers are more likely to comprehend what
    they are reading
  • Building fluency makes reading less effortful and
    less frustrating for students
  • Because building fluency makes reading more
    rewarding, it increases the chance that a student
    will chose to read (and as a result increase
    incidental learning of vocabulary and background
    knowledge)

54
Research on Fluency Instruction
  • Repeated and monitored oral reading
  • Student-adult reading
  • Choral reading
  • Tape-assisted reading
  • Partner reading
  • Readers theatre
  • Practice oral rereading at students independent
    reading level (95)
  • Model fluent reading

55
Example of Assessment of Fluency
  • Screening and Progress Monitoring
  • DIBELS or AIMSweb Oral Reading Fluency
  • Diagnostic
  • Multi-Dimensional Fluency Scale from 3-Minute
    Reading Assessment

56
Important issues about measuring fluency in older
students with reading disabilities
  • DO assess their fluency levels for diagnostic
    purposes
  • DO teach them skills designed to improve their
    fluency levels
  • DO NOT use fluency measures for progress
    monitoring reading goals on IEPs for older
    students (grade 5 and above)

57
Older students with a Moderate Reading Disability
  • Before instruction
  • Word reading accuracy 10 ile
  • Reading fluency below 1 ile
  • Comprehension 8 ile
  • 100 hours in small group intervention
  • After instruction
  • Word reading accuracy 39 ile
  • Reading fluency 8 ile
  • Comprehension 39 ile

58
Older students with aSevere Reading Disability
  • Before instruction
  • Word reading accuracy 2 ile
  • Reading fluency below 1 ile
  • Comprehension 8 ile
  • 68 hours in one to one intervention
  • After instruction
  • Word reading accuracy 23 ile
  • Reading fluency 5 ile
  • Comprehension 27 ile

59
The Fluency Gap
  • These results show that with intensive
    interventions disabled students make significant
    progress in the areas of word reading accuracy
    and comprehension, but their reading fluency
    continues to lag behind.
  • It seems to be related to lack of practice
    reading outside of school. This lack of practice
    results in huge differences in sight word
    vocabulary which impacts fluency.

60
Progress Monitoringof Fluency
  • For progress monitoring reading goals on IEPs of
    older students, we recommend that you DO NOT
    measure fluency (i.e., rate)
  • Instead measure these alternative skills
  • Accuracy of Reading Connected Text
  • Recognition of Sight Words or Phrases

61
Example of Fluency Alternative
  • Text reading accuracy
  • Bob is a 5th grader who read a 2nd semester, 2nd
    grade passage with 85 accuracy.

62
Example Text Reading Accuracy
  • Goal
  • In one semester, Bob will read a 3rd grade
    passage with 90 accuracy.
  • Indicator
  • R 3.1.2.4 Uses a variety of word-recognition
    strategies (e.g., practicing words in isolation,
    practicing reading words in text) to read
    fluently.

63
Example of an Alternative Fluency Goal
  • Sight word recognition
  • Mike is a 5th grader who currently recognizes 72
    of the first 100 Fry words.

64
ExampleSight Word Recognition
  • Goal
  • In 9 instructional weeks, when given word cards
    of the first 100 Fry words, Mike will recognize
    at least 95 of these words.
  • Indicator
  • R 2.1.3.1 Demonstrates automatic recognition of
    sight words.

65
Example of Assessment of Fluency
  • Screening/Progress Monitoring DIBELS ORF
  • Billy is a 3rd grader who scored 34 ORF on a
    third grade DIBELS passage given at the beginning
    of year.
  • Diagnostic Multi-Dimensional Fluency scale from
    3-Minute Reading Assessment (four point rubric)
  • Billys total score 1.5
  • Expression and Volume 2
  • Phrasing and intonation 1
  • Smoothness 1
  • Pace 2

66
ExampleOral Reading Fluency
  • Goal
  • By the end of 36 weeks, given a fourth grade
    measure of oral reading fluency, Billy will score
    93 words read correctly in one minute.
  • Indicator
  • R3.1.2.3 Uses knowledge of sentence structure to
    read fluently at instructional or independent
    reading levels.

67
How Much Do Typical Students Increase Fluency
Each Week?
  • Average number of words per minute increase per
    week according to grade level
  • First 2.0 - 2.5
  • Second 2.0
  • Third 1.0 1.5
  • Fourth 1.0
  • Fifth .5
  • Sixth .5

68
Intervention Notebook
  • Fluency

69
  • Task 1
  • Based on the assessment information, find a
    fluency intervention appropriate for Billy.
  • If the intervention was not successful, how could
    you increase the intensity and explicitness of
    the intervention?
  • Task 2
  • As a table group, look at the interventions for
    fluency and discuss the following questions
  • Given this students assessment results, what
    Tier of support would be appropriate?
  • How does your building increase the customization
    of interventions to match student needs?

70
Essential Component 4
  • Vocabulary
  • Words we must know to communicate effectively

71
Some Vocabulary Facts
  • Students learn about 3,000 new words each year.
  • About 25-50 percent of annual vocabulary growth
    comes from incidental learning from context while
    reading. Because students with reading problems
    read less material, they fall further and further
    behind in vocabulary knowledge.
  • Efforts to increase the size of oral vocabulary
    need to start earlyin preschool and in
    kindergartenin order to positively affect
    reading achievement

72
Research on Vocabulary Instruction
  • Tiered words reflect a way of systematizing
    vocabulary instruction.
  • Tier 1 very common, high frequency words
  • Tier 2 important and useful words known by a
    mature reader
  • Tier 3 very difficult, rare words
  • Generally, instruction for meaning should focus
    on teaching Tier 2 words.

73
Research on Vocabulary Instruction
  • Explicit Instruction, focusing on
  • Important words
  • Useful words
  • Difficult words (e.g., multiple meanings, idioms)
  • Use of word parts
  • Use of context clues
  • Use of reference materials

74
Research on Vocabulary Instruction
  • Implicit Instruction (exposure over extended
    time)
  • Students need to read outside of the classroom
  • Some students can be encouraged to read outside
    of class by letting them select materials of
    interest at very easy levels of difficulty
  • In the classroom, multi-media methods

75
Example of Assessment of Vocabulary Knowledge
  • Screening/Progress Monitoring
  • Cloze test where words of only one grammatical
    type are omitted. Baseline Data On a
    teacher-made Cloze test, where all words omitted
    were adjectives, Sarah, a 4th grader, inserted
    appropriate adjectives in 25 of the blanks.
  • Diagnostic
  • Word definitions

76
ExampleVocabulary
  • Goal
  • By the end of 36 weeks, when given a teacher-made
    Cloze test where only adjectives are omitted,
    Sarah will insert words of appropriate meaning
    and grammatical type in 75 of the blanks.
  • Indicator
  • R 4.1.3.1 determines meaning of words or phrases
    using context clues from sentences

77
Intervention Notebook
  • Vocabulary

78
  • Task 1
  • Based on the assessment information, find a
    vocabulary intervention appropriate for Sarah.
  • If the intervention was not successful, how could
    you increase the intensity and explicitness of
    the intervention?
  • Task 2
  • As a table group, look at the interventions for
    vocabulary and discuss the following questions
  • Given this students assessment results, what
    Tier of support would be appropriate?
  • How does your building increase the customization
    of interventions as a student moves through the
    tiers?

79
Essential Component 5
  • Reading Comprehension
  • The ability to read for understanding.
  • Reading with purpose and thinking
  • actively while reading.

80
ACTIVITYRead Dire Straits
81
Review Dire Straits
  • Except for names, how many of the words are
    totally new?
  • Except for names, how many words do you need help
    with pronouncing?
  • How many words would you have difficulty using in
    a sentence?
  • So is it possible to do these three things and
    still not comprehend?

82
Important Steps in Comprehension
  • Activation of background knowledge
  • Determining importance in text (purpose for
    reading)
  • Students need to interact with text
  • Strategy instruction

83
Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction
  • Most effective strategies
  • Monitoring comprehension
  • Using graphic and semantic organizers
  • Answering questions
  • Generating questions
  • Recognizing story structure
  • Summarizing

84
Research on ReadingComprehension Instruction
  • Teach strategies explicitly
  • direct explanation (why, when)
  • modeling of strategies (think-aloud)
  • guided practice
  • application
  • Teach through cooperative learning
  • Provide multiple-strategy instruction so that
    students learn to use strategies flexibly and in
    combination

85
Two Voices In My Head
  • Word Calling Voice
  • When this voice acts alone, the reader is checked
    out.
  • Thinking Voice
  • Visualizes
  • Predicts
  • Connects
  • Questions
  • Summarizes
  • Monitors

86
Instructional Techniques for Teaching
Comprehension
  • Think Aloud teacher reads aloud and voices
    his/her thinking to model strategies
  • Shared Reading teacher reads aloud, students
    follow along, typically for whole class strategy
    practice
  • Guided Reading small group only, teacher
    divides text in segments, students read and stop
    to discuss the strategy
  • Independent Practice student reads silently and
    individually tracks his/her own thinking

87
Examples of Assessment of Reading Comprehension
  • Screening/ Progress monitoring
  • Maze test. Baseline data Jim is a fourth grade
    student whose score on AIMSweb Mazes this winter
    was 7 (at the 10th percentile).
  • Diagnostic
  • KRA Retell Rubric for Narrative
  • Jim scored 4 of 20 possible points on the
    narrative retell rubric on the 4th grade passage
    (retold characters and setting with prompting).

88
First Example of a Goal for Comprehension Maze
  • Goal
  • In 36 instructional weeks, given a 5th grade
    level Maze probe, Jim will score 20 (at the
    50ile).
  • Indicator
  • R 4.1.4.5 Uses information from the text to make
    inferences and draw conclusions.

89
Second Example of GoalRetell Rubric
  • Goal
  • By the end of 36 instructional weeks, given a 5th
    grade narrative passage, Jim will retell the
    story and score 14 of 20 possible points on the
    narrative retell rubric.
  • Indicator
  • R 5.1.4.9 Retells main ideas or events as well as
    supporting details in appropriate level
    narrative, expository, technical, and persuasive
    texts.

90
Intervention Notebook
  • Reading Comprehension

91
  • Task 1
  • Based on the assessment information, find a
    comprehension intervention appropriate for Jim.
  • If the intervention was not successful, how could
    you increase the intensity and explicitness of
    the intervention?
  • Task 2
  • As a table group, look at interventions for
    comprehension and discuss the following
  • Given this students assessment results, what
    Tier of support would be appropriate?
  • How does your building increase the customization
    of interventions as a student moves through the
    tiers?

92
Deborah McVey Lawrence Public Schools dlmcvey_at_usd4
97.org
Funded with Federal IDEA Part B Funds through
KSDE Student Support Services
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com