INTRODUCTION of UNFCCC and the KYOTO PROTOCOL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

INTRODUCTION of UNFCCC and the KYOTO PROTOCOL

Description:

INTRODUCTION of UNFCCC and the KYOTO PROTOCOL. Workshop on International Experience on Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol in CEE Countries ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:306
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Mirosla85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INTRODUCTION of UNFCCC and the KYOTO PROTOCOL


1
  • INTRODUCTION of UNFCCC and the KYOTO PROTOCOL
  • Workshop on International Experience on
    Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol in CEE
    Countries
  • Zsuzsanna Ivanyi
  • 6-7 January, 2006

2
OUTLINE
  • 1. Background and Motivation for Climate Policy
  • some scientific facts
  • potential impacts
  • 2. Milestones of Climate negotiations
  • 3. The Kyoto Protocol
  • provisions
  • rulebook
  • where are we?
  • 4. Conclusions and the Way Ahead

3
WHY DO WE NEED CLIMATE POLICY? Some science
  • Background
  • The greenhouse effect natural vs. human
  • Since beginning of industrial revolution (1700)
  • the major GHGs have increased
  • Greenhouse Gases CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6

4
Mauna Loa Curve
5
GREENHOUSE GASES
6
SCIENTIFIC FACTS 1
7
SCIENTIFIC FACTS 2
8
SCIENTIFIC FACTS 3
  • 1990's was most likely the warmest decade
  • ever, and 1998 the warmest year
  • precipitation patterns have changed
  • snow cover and ice extent have decreased
  • global average sea level has risen
  • the oceans are warming
  • glaciers are shrinked
  • circulation patterns are changing

9
  • IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001)
  • Statements
  • most of the earths warming over the last 50
    years (0.6 degrees Celsius) can be attributed to
    human activities ,
  • effects are already felt
  • global temperature is expected to increase by 1.4
    - 5.8 degrees Celsius over the next century
  • Potential impacts
  • increase in frequency and intensity of extreme
    climate events
  • increase in risk of desertification
  • human health

10
SPECIALITIES of CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENTS
  • UNCERTAINTY the socio-economic development rate,
    its environmental impact and the feedback between
    them is uncertain.
  • GEOGRAPHICAL SCALE climate change is a global
    phenomenon affecting the whole world, at the same
    time environmental and socio-economic impulses
    and responses are highly differentiated across
    regions.
  • TIME SCALE climate change is a long-term
    phenomenon. Assessing impacts on environmental
    and socio-economic systems requires a long-run
    perspective.

11
WHY DO WE NEED CLIMATE POLICY?
  • Because
  • Climate change is human induced
  • Climate change is complex issue and economic
    characteristics highlight difficulty to cope with
  • Joint international efforts, collective actions
    and control are needed, but
  • Due to large economic and environmental
    asymmetries among world regions, actions are
    needed internationally coordinated and harmonized
  • International environmental agreements

12
MILESTONES of CLIMATE NEGOTIATIONS (1)
  • 1979 First World Climate Conference in Geneva
  • 1985 First major scientific international
    conference on the greenhouse effect, Villach
  • 1988 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
    (IPCC)
  • 1990 Second World Climate Conference in Geneva,
    First Assessment Report of the IPCC
  • 1992 Earth Summit Rio de Janeiro, UN
    Framework Convention on Climate Changeprevent
    dangerous warming from greenhouse gases, and sets
    initial target of reducing emissions from
    industrialized countries to 1990 levels by the
    year 2000

13
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
  • The Convention
  • an overall framework for intergovernmental
    efforts to tackle the challenge posed by climate
    change 
  • recognizes that the climate system is a shared
    resource whose stability can be affected by
    industrial and other emissions of carbon dioxide
    and other greenhouse gases.
  • Under the Convention the governments
  • gather and share information on greenhouse gases
    emissions, national policies and best practices
  • launch national strategies for addressing GHGs
    and adaptation, including the provision of
    financial and technological support to developing
    countries 
  • cooperate in preparing for adaptation to the
    impacts of climate change.

14
MILESTONES of CLIMATE NEGOTIATIONS (2)
  • 1994 Entry-into-force by UNFCCC
  • ultimate objective () stabilisation of
    greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere
    at a level that would prevent dangerous
    anthropogenic interference with the climate
    system () (Art. 2),
  • emphasising that () the Parties should protect
    the climate system () on the basis of equity and
    in accordance with their common but
    differentiated responsibilities and respective
    capabilities. (Art. 3)
  • ? Application of the UNFCCC represented crucial
    step towards the Kyoto process
  • 1995 first meeting of Conference of Parties
    COP-1 in Berlin Berlin Mandate
  • 1997 COP-3 in Kyoto Kyoto Protocol

15
KYOTO PROTOCOL (1)
  • shares the Conventions objective, principles and
    institutions,
  • strengthens the Convention by committing Annex I
    Parties to individual, legally-binding targets to
    limit or reduce GHGs,
  • legally binding commitments for emission
    reduction, on average 5 from 1990 levels in the
    commitment period 2008-2012,
  • only Parties to the Convention that have also
    become Parties to the Protocol (i.e by ratifying,
    accepting, approving, or acceding to it) will be
    bound by the Protocols commitments,
  • only developed countries are required to making
    commitments. The individual targets for Annex I
    Parties are listed in the Kyoto Protocols Annex
    B.

16
Individual Target (1990 - 2008/2012)
  • Countries included in Annex B to the Kyoto
    Protocol
  • EU-15, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia,
    Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Monaco,
    Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland-8
  • US-7
  • Canada, Hungary, Japan, Poland-6
  • Croatia-5
  • New Zealand, Russian Federation, Ukraine 0
  • Norway1
  • Australia8
  • Iceland10
  • To achieve these targets, the KP foresees the
    following two broad strategies Mitigation and
    Adaptation

17
KYOTO PROTOCOL (2)
  • 1.The KP indicates also a variety of policies and
    measures that should be employed in order to
    achieve the targets
  • Increase of sinks (forest and cropland
    management)
  • Increase share of RES
  • Increase energy efficiency
  • 2. The KP foresees that the national measures are
    integrated with international measures aimed at
    achieving the targets in a cost-effective
    wayEstablishment of flexible mechanisms
    (additional to domestic)
  • Joint Implementation
  • Clean development Mechanism
  • Emissions Trading

18
KYOTO PROTOCOL (3)
  • Joint Implementation (ERUs) GHG mitigation
    projects between developed countries as defined
    in Art. 6 of the KP,
  • Clean Development Mechanism (CERs)GHG
    mitigation projects between developed and
    developing countries as established in Art. 12 of
    the KP,
  • purposes assisting developing countries in
    achieving sustainable development and helping
    Annex I parties meet their emissions targets
  • Emissions Trading (AAUs)Defined in Art. 17 of
    the KP, transfer some of emissions under its
    assigned amount (AAUs) or EURs,CERS, RMUs
  • ?to increase the cost-effectiveness of climate
    policies by reducing the countries abatement
    costs

19
KYOTO PROTOCOL (4)
  • Rulebook Marrakesh Accords (COP 7, 2001),
  • adopted at COP 11, 2005
  • 1.Compliance Committee Facilitative and

  • Enforcement Branch
  • 2. Set the ground for KMs
  • Eligibility requirements
  • Ratification of the KP
  • Assigned amounts have to be calculated
  • National system for estimating GHG sources and
    sinks must be put in place
  • National registry must be put in place
  • Annually report information on emission and
    removals

20
KYOTO PROTOCOL (5)
  • Where are we now?
  • Ratified in 2005
  • US pulled out, but Russia's participating
  • CDM and JI are operational
  • EU ETS is in test phase
  • The protocol is a first and small step compared
    to what will be needed

Commitments so far defined for the period from
1990 (base year) to 2012
New commitment discussions for 2nd period
Test Period EU Emission Trading
1st Commitment Period
2nd Commitment Period
3rd Commitment Period
Year
2022
2017
2012
2008
2005
21
CONCLUSIONS
  • Project based FMs are excellent tools to attract
    foreign investments and thereby to promote
    technological upgrading
  • Projects under the FMs need to follow
    international provisions and demonstrate real
    emission reduction
  • JI/CDM projects are operational and achieved
    ERUs/CERs can be used for investing countries to
    meet compliance with Kyoto target
  • In participating FMs proper national legal,
    institutional and administrative background is
    needed.

22
  • Thank you very much for your attention!
  • zivanyi_at_rec.org
  • www.rec.org/REC/Programs/ClimateChange.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com