DAMA International - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

DAMA International

Description:

Laying foundations for the next wave. of G2G and G2B data ... national data agreement before defining a minium set of data could have taken years. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: King120
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DAMA International


1
DAMA International Australia Conference
2005
Old Parliament House, Canberra, 19-21 October
Data Management in the 21st Century
Laying foundations for the next wave of G2G and
G2B data interoperability
DAMA Australia
2
Connecting Government A Case Study
  • Fran Parker Phil Morgan
  • Australian Government Indigenous
  • Management Information System (AGIMIS) Project
  • OIPC
  • DAMA Conference
  • October 2005

3
Agenda
  • PART 1 ESTABLISHING
  • BACKGROUND new arrangements, drivers, whole
    picture
  • PROJECT objective, stages, governance
  • GUIDING SCOPE reporting cycle, reporting
    principles, criteria
  • PART 2 REPORTING AND DATA
  • REPORTING against reporting cycle by dimensions
  • DATA min data set, extended, contextual
  • LEARNING FROM THE CASE STUDY

4
New Arrangements in Indigenous Affairs from 2004
  • The Governments Indigenous programs are now
    administered by mainstream agencies, under a
    whole of government approach.
  • A Ministerial Taskforce on Indigenous Affairs
    provides leadership and strategic direction at
    the national level, advised by the Secretaries
    Group on Indigenous Affairs and the National
    Indigenous Council.
  • Office of Indigenous Policy Coordination (OIPC)
    established.
  • Multi-agency Indigenous Coordination Centre
    (ICCs) have been established to coordinate the
    regional service delivery.

5
Need for Better Reporting and Data Arrangements
  • New arrangements will partly rely on accurate and
    timely information exchange between agencies, and
    reporting capabilities at all levels of
    operation.
  • Ideally, adequate and comparable information on
    Indigenous services should be available to
  •    support policy the whole of government focus
    on service delivery, minimisation of the
    administrative impost on communities, and future
    government decision making
  •    support program implementation, including
    both national program requirements and
    co-ordination and co-operation at a regional
    level and
  •     provide program performance monitoring and
    reporting on a whole of government basis.
  • enhance the quality of the information to
    Government on where and how money is spent, on
    whom, and who benefits.

6
Whole of Government Drivers
  • In establishing the new approach to the delivery
    of Indigenous services, the government has
    committed to Improved accountability,
    performance monitoring and reporting are built
    into the new arrangements1.
  •   
  • In launching Connecting Government 2 Dr Peter
    Shergold expressed the view that a whole of
    government approach was one which can inspire
    innovative national approaches to the delivery of
    services to Indigenous Australians and further,
    in discussing whole of government policy that a
    Government has a right to know the whole picture
    a public service has the responsibility to
    provide it.
  • 1 Five Principles - The new approach to
    Indigenous Affairs, Principle 4 - Accountability,
    OIPC Website 2005
  • 2 Speech to Launch Connecting Government
    Whole of Government Responses to Australias
    Priority Challenges, Dr Peter Shergold, April
    2004.

7
Conceptually The Whole Picture
8
AGIMIS Project
  • Develop an Indigenous management information
    system to support the long term policy, program
    implementation and reporting requirements of the
    joined-up, whole of government approach to
    Indigenous funding, program performance
    monitoring and reporting

9
Governance Structures
10
Initial Reporting Needs
  • Consultation with stakeholders led to four
    questions
  • 1. What are government intentions in relation to
    Indigenous people and communities as expressed by
    policies, outcomes/outputs and priorities?
  • 2. What is the effort government is making to
    address those expressed policies,
    outcomes/outputs and priorities?
  • 3. What evidence is there that the effort of
    government is effective in bringing about the
    expressed outcomes and/or addressing the priority
    areas?
  • 4. What contextual data would enhance the
    reporting environment?

11
Government Services Life Cycle
12
AGIMIS Reporting Principles - based on GRI
                                                 
       
 
13
Success Criteria adopted UK FABRIC
  • Focused on the organisations aims and
    objectives.
  • Appropriate to, and useful for, stakeholders who
    are likely to use it.
  • Balanced giving a picture of what the
    organisation is doing, covering all significant
    areas of work.
  • Robust in order to withstand organisational
    changes or individuals leaving.
  • Integrated into the organisation, being part of
    the business planning and management processes.
  • Cost-effective balancing the benefits of the
    information against the costs
  • 1 Choosing the Right FABRIC A Framework for
    Performance Information, HM Treasury, Audit
    Comm., Cabinet Office, National Statistics,
    National Audit Office, March 2001

14
Determining AGIMIS Scope
15
Scope of Reporting and Data
16
Preliminary Scope of Reports Required
  • Using the reporting cycle various reporting needs
    were identified from direction setting thru
    service delivery and performance management to
    needs/issues.
  • Information needs to be presented from a range of
    perspectives
  • Functional Sector
  • Region/location
  • Time
  • Organisation
  • Approx 50 reports identified and captured in
    AGIMIS Catalog of Reporting Requirements.

17
Data Sets
  • Minimum Data set
  • Developed thru IRG and RD Working Group
  • Data known to be available. Initial spec and
    collection in July 05 and confirmation in Nov
    2005
  • Incorporates data on agency outcome/outputs, AGIE
    Programs, expenditure estimates various
    reporting categories such as government purpose,
    target recipients and intended locations
  • Extended Data Set
  • Being developed thru IRG and RD Working Group
  • Data known to be not fully available. Collection
    in 2006
  • Incorporates data on service delivery,
    expenditure, performance information and
    agreements
  • Contextual Data
  • Demographics, census data, reporting
    classifications, geography
  • Historical Data
  • Program/service delivery data prior to 2005 on
    case-by-case basis

18
Learning from the Case Study (1)
  • Focus of Information Needs
  • Identifying the wealth of data available is
    relatively easy.
  • Identifying the variety of information needs of a
    very diverse set of stakeholders is difficult.
  • Approached this by presenting prototype reports
    to show what is possible and help tease out
    information needs rather than data needs. We
    have complemented this by a data availability
    survey
  • Data, data everywhere be judicious
  • Wealth of information around. But much of the
    data is isolated.
  • The challenge to identify that data which can be
    integrated and which adds value. Also harvest a
    variety of contextual data.
  • Just because it exists doesnt mean it should be
    included in AGIMIS. Apply the FABRIC criteria to
    prioritise the data.

19
Learning from the Case Study (2)
  • A wealth of good practices exist - reuse dont
    reinvent
  • Team has gone to lengths to reuse good practices,
    including those by agencies such the ABS, AIHW
    and Geoscience Australia
  • Adopted international approaches such as the UK
    Government and the United Nations. Used
    standards such as ISO/IEC 11179 and frameworks
    such as FABRIC and GRI.
  • Take a risk put up a strawman model
  • The team did not wait to establish a national
    data agreement before defining a minium set of
    data could have taken years.
  • Instead, presented strawman information model
    based on generic concepts covering government
    service planning delivery.
  • Accounting for data availability, consulting with
    IRG and RDWG developed Indigenous Services
    National Minimum Data Set.

20
Learning from the Case Study (3)
  • Connecting Government is much more than
    technology
  • The current challenge for AGIMIS is not
    technological. Team has adopted a low-key
    approach to technology this may change as the
    scope and volume of data and information needs
    increase
  • Overall, the key focus of the team is on
    stakeholder engagement this is seen as
    fundamental to Connecting Government
  • High level government commitment makes for good
    cooperation
  • Team has received outstanding cooperation and
    support from stakeholder agencies
  • The high level commitment of Government to
    Indigenous Affairs with the Ministerial Taskforce
    and Secretaries Group has provided necessary
    leadership
  • But it is the ongoing commitment of stakeholders
    at all levels that will pave the way for
    Connecting Government

21
More Information
  • www.oipc.gov.au/agimis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com