HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 1 PSYCHOLOGY 3050: Memory Development 1 Ch10 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 1 PSYCHOLOGY 3050: Memory Development 1 Ch10

Description:

Object Constancy (Slater, Mattock, & Brown, 1990) Continuation (Kellman & Spelke, 1983) ... Young children do well on recognition tasks. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:465
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: jamesd69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 1 PSYCHOLOGY 3050: Memory Development 1 Ch10


1
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 1
PSYCHOLOGY 3050 Memory Development 1
(Ch10)
Dr. Jamie Drover SN-3094, 737-8383 e-mail --
jrdrover_at_mun.ca Winter Semester, 2009
2
Last Class
  • Knowledge of objects
  • Object Constancy (Slater, Mattock, Brown, 1990)
  • Continuation (Kellman Spelke, 1983)
  • Support (Baillargeon et al., 1995)
  • Object Permanence (Newcombe et al., 1999)
  • Early knowledge may be implicit.
  • Hood et al. (2000)
  • Newcombe et al. (2000)
  • Is knowledge of objects innate?
  • Representational or architectural innateness.
  • No (Bogartz et al., 1998)

3
Memory Development
  • Memories can be retrieved in different ways.
  • Recognition a stimulus is presented and one must
    determine whether it is new or old.
  • Young children do well on recognition tasks.
  • Recall information that is not currently
    perceived must be retrieved from memory.
  • Cued Recall retrieval is prompted by an
    environmental context or cue.

4
Memory Development
  • Free recall no external cue is presented.

5
Memory Development in Infancy Preference for
Novelty as an Indication of Memory
  • Usually assessed using the habituation/
    dishabituation paradigm.
  • Researchers also use preference-for-novelty
    paradigms.
  • Infants are shown a novel stimulus and a
    familiarized one.
  • Preference for the novel stimulus is seen as
    memory for the familiar one.

6
Memory Development in Infancy Preference for
Novelty as an Indication of Memory
  • Fagan (1973, 1974) found that 5- and 6-month-olds
    will show visual memories for stimuli following
    brief exposures.
  • These memories can last two weeks.
  • Spence (1996) had mothers of 1-month-olds read
    nursery rhymes over a 2 week period.
  • Using the sucking rate paradigm, infants will
    adjust sucking rate to hear the familiar rhyme
    even after a 3 day delay.

7
Memory Development in Infancy Conjugate
Reinforcement Procedure
  • Rovee-Collier (1999) tied a ribbon to an infants
    ankle and connected it to a mobile.

8
Memory Development in Infancy Conjugate
Reinforcement Procedure
  • In the first 3 minutes, the ribbon is not
    connected to the mobile (baseline
    nonreinforcement).
  • In the next 9 minutes, the ribbon and mobile are
    connected.
  • Following delays, infants are placed back in the
    crib and their foot is connected to the ribbon.
  • If they show a high kicking rate, it reflects
    memory.

9
Memory Development in Infancy Conjugate
Reinforcement Procedure
  • 3-month-olds were tested using this procedure.
  • They showed no forgetting after 8 days.
  • In related research, 8-week-olds showed that they
    could retain these memories for 2 weeks.
  • Rovee-Collier has also focused on the role of
    context in memory
  • How similar must the learning environment and
    testing environment be to remember?

10
Memory Development in Infancy Conjugate
Reinforcement Procedure
  • Infants were seated in a playpen with a very
    distinctive cloth.
  • Infants underwent the standard kicking training.
  • For the test, infants could be placed in the same
    context (same cloth) or in a different context
    (different cloth).
  • When in the same context, infants demonstrate far
    better retention.

11
How Long Do Infants Memories Last?
  • Older infants have been tested with the train
    task.
  • Infants sit in front of a miniature train set and
    learn that they can move the train around by
    pressing a lever.
  • Infants are tested after a delay by sitting in
    front of the lever which is now not connected to
    the train.

12
How Long Do Infants Memories Last?
  • Infants memories last longer with age.

13
How Long Do Infants Memories Last?
  • Infants long-term memory has been tested using
    deferred imitation.
  • Infants can remember novel actions for as long as
    one year.
  • Bauer (2002) tested infants with a 3-step task.
  • Placed a bar across two posts
  • Hung a plate from the bar
  • Struck the plate with a mallet

14
How Long Do Infants Memories Last?
  • Following delays, infants were given the
    materials and tested for deferred imitation.
  • Rate of deferred imitation was higher in older
    children.
  • Older children can handle longer delays.

15
How Long Do Infants Memories Last?
  • Deferred imitation likely relies on several brain
    areas
  • hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, structures within
    the temporal lobe.
  • The hippocampus underlies the earliest deferred
    imitation.
  • To retain information following long delays,
    these areas need to mature and coalesce.

16
Infantile Amnesia
  • The inability to recall information from early
    childhood.
  • We are unable to remember events that happened
    before we were 3.5 or 4 years of age.
  • We lack autobiographical memories.
  • Personal and long-lasting memories which are the
    basis for ones personal life history.
  • Usher and Neisser (1993) found that the earliest
    memory for college students was about 2 years of
    age.

17
Why Cant We Remember Early Events?
  • Two explanations.
  • Information is not stored for long-term retention
    before 2 years of age.
  • The information is encoded differently.
  • The second explanation is more likely.
  • When we are older, our minds are no longer like
    those of infants.
  • We now use verbal symbols.

18
Why Cant We Remember Early Events?
  • Infants are tested on recall motor memories,
    whereas children and adults are tested on verbal
    memories.
  • Infants can not convert memories into verbal
    memories.
  • Simcock and Hayne (2002) showed children (27-39
    months) sequences of actions and interviewed them
    6 and 12 months later.

19
Why Cant We Remember Early Events?
20
Why Cant We Remember Early Events?
  • Although they had the verbal ability, children
    did not use it to describe the previous
    experience.
  • They did so only if they had the vocabulary to
    describe the event when it was experienced.
  • More verbally sophisticated children at the time
    of the initial test verbally recalled the event.
  • Children could not translate earlier preverbal
    experiences into language.

21
Last Class
  • Memory Development in Infancy
  • Preference Novelty Fagan
  • Mobile Task Rovee-Collier
  • Context cues Rovee-Collier
  • How Long do Memories Last?
  • Train Task
  • Deferred Imitation Bauer (2002)
  • Infantile Amnesia Lack autobiographical
    memories.
  • May be language-related Simcock Hayne (2002)

22
Why Cant We Remember Early Events?
  • But why can 3- and 4-year-olds recount verbally
    events that happened years before.
  • Howe and Courage (1993) believe that in order to
    lay down and retrieve autobiographical memories,
    a sense of self is needed.
  • This develops in the preschool years.
  • Unless events can be related to the self, they
    can not be retrieved later.

23
Why Cant We Remember Early Events?
  • Perhaps infantile amnesia can be explained by the
    fuzzy-trace theory.
  • Young children attempt to encode verbatim
    (precise) memories, whereas older children rely
    on gist (meaning) memories.
  • Verbatim memories are more easily forgotten.
  • They are unavailable later in childhood and
    adulthood.

24
Implicit Memory
  • Unconscious memories. Memory without awareness.
  • Implicit and explicit memories appear to be
    governed by different brain systems.
  • The hippocampus is involved with explicit
    memories.
  • There appear to be few age differences on
    implicit memory.

25
Implicit Memory
  • Researchers test this using fragmented pictures
    that the child has to identify.
  • Children are shown a series of degraded pictures
    and later given another task involving those
    pictures.
  • Children perform the second task better even
    though they may not remember the earlier
    pictures.
  • There are few age differences.

26
Implicit Memory
  • Hayes and Hennessy (1996) showed 4-, 5-, and
    10-year-old children a series of pictures on one
    day and asked them to identify the picture or
    asked to answer questions about the item.
  • Two days later, the children were showed some of
    the previous pictures and some new ones to
    identify in the fragmented picture task.

27
(No Transcript)
28
Implicit Memory
  • Older children identified more pictures and
    recognized more that they had seen earlier.
  • The priming effect was equal for children of all
    ages.
  • The degree to which they identified old pictures
    sooner than new pictures.

29
Implicit Memory
  • Newcombe and Fox (1994) showed 9- and
    10-year-olds pictures of 4- and 5-year-olds, some
    of whom were there classmates.
  • They had to recognize their classmate (explicit
    memory) while their skin conductance was being
    measured (implicit memory).
  • There was no difference on skin conductance
    between children who did well or poorly on the
    explicit task.

30
The Development of Event Memory
  • Things that happen to us during the course of
    everyday life.
  • Its explicit, but encoding is unintentional.
  • How do children remember events?
  • The event must be attended and perceived.
  • Young children pay attention to different aspects
    of an event than do adults.
  • Children sometimes attend to trivial events.

31
The Development of Event Memory
  • Event memory is constructive in nature.
  • We recall gist implying that we transform the
    event.
  • Our memory for events is influenced by our
    previous knowledge.

32
Last Class
  • Infantile Amnesia
  • Sense of self (Howe Courage, 1993)
  • Fuzzy trace theory
  • Implicit Memories
  • Unconscious memories
  • Fragmented Pictures/Priming Effect (Hayes
    Hennessy, 1996)
  • Event memory
  • Children attend to different aspects

33
Script-Based Memory
  • Preschool children organize their memory in terms
    of scripts.
  • A form of schematic organization of real-world
    events organized in terms of their casual and
    temporal characteristics.
  • Fast food restaurant script
  • Young children and even pre-verbal infants appear
    to organize information temporally into scripts.

34
Script-Based Memory
  • Bauer and Mandler (1989) showed infants from 11.5
    to 20 months a sequence of events.
  • Children were then given the materials.
  • Children re-enacted the sequence of events in the
    same temporal order they had been shown.
  • Because children use scripts they tend not to
    remember specific details.
  • See Fivush and Hamond (1990) on p. 279.

35
Script-Based Memory
  • Children tend to recall routine information
    rather than novel aspects of a special event.
  • Nelson (1996) believes that script-based memory
    has adaptive value by permitting children to
    predict the likelihood of events in the future.
  • Memory is designed to retain information about
    frequent and recurrent events.

36
Children as Eyewitnesses Age Differences
  • In typical studies, children observe an event or
    activity and are not told that they will be asked
    to remember what they view.
  • Later they are asked what they remember.
  • They are asked free recall questions, cued recall
    questions, and recognition questions.

37
How Much do They Remember, and How Accurate are
They?
  • Preschool children remember only a small
    proportion of the event in response to
    free-recall questions.
  • What they recall is highly accurate and central
    to the event.
  • When given general cues, they recall more
    information more correct and incorrect facts.
  • These false memories can persist after long
    delays and when asked to recognize.

38
How Much do They Remember, and How Accurate are
They?
  • False memories can not be based on verbatim
    information it is based on gist and is,
    therefore, resistant to forgetting.

39
How Long Do Memories Last
  • With delays of one month or less, children of all
    ages remember about the same proportion of
    accurate and inaccurate information as they did
    originally.
  • After 6 month delays, 6 year-olds recall is less
    accurate than that of adults.

40
How Long Do Memories Last
  • According to fuzzy trace, there is a greater rate
    of decay of verbatim (exact) memories relative to
    gist (false) memories.

41
Factors Influencing Childrens Eyewitness Memory
  • Factors include IQ, incentives to be accurate,
    intermediate levels of stress, and emotionally
    supportive mothers.
  • The Role of Knowledge
  • Children who know more about medical procedures
    remember more about the procedure.
  • Ornstein et al. (1998) tested 4- and 6-year-old
    childrens recall of a mock physical exam.

42
Factors Influencing Childrens Eyewitness Memory
  • The exam included typical and atypical features.
  • Children were interviewed about the exam after a
    12 week delay.
  • They were asked open-ended questions followed by
    increasingly specific questions.
  • Also asked specific questions about things that
    did not happen.

43
Factors Influencing Childrens Eyewitness Memory
  • Typical features are more likely to be recalled
    correctly than atypical features.
  • The children likely had a script for the exam.
  • Children were more likely to correctly reject
    nonevents for the atypical features.
  • Children were more likely to say false events
    occurred when they were typical as opposed to
    atypical.

44
Factors Influencing Childrens Eyewitness Memory
  • Characteristics of the Interview
  • Children recall little in response to open-ended
    free recall questions, but it is accurate.
  • They recall more with cues, but are more
    inaccurate.
  • What about anatomically correct dolls.
  • Bruck et al. (1995) interviewed 3-year-olds
    following a medical exam.

45
Factors Influencing Childrens Eyewitness Memory
  • Half received a genital exam whereas the other
    half did not.
  • Using the doll they were asked whether the doctor
    touched their genitals.
  • Half of the group that received the exam said
    yes.
  • Half of the group that did not receive the exam
    said yes.
  • 50 of the children who did not receive the exam
    pointed to the anal or genital region.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com