I cured my own GVHD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

I cured my own GVHD

Description:

A 29 year old male was diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia ... Autologous stem cells collected in 8/06 ... Mainstay of treatment is high dose steroids ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: jakest
Category:
Tags: gvhd | cured | mainstay

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: I cured my own GVHD


1
I cured my own GVHD
  • Jeevan Sekhar
  • Hem/Onc Grand Rounds
  • March 20, 2009

2
Outline
  • Case
  • Overview of GVH
  • Clinical
  • Pathophysiology
  • Overview of current aGVH management
  • Potential of autologous stem cell infusion as
    treatment

3
Case
  • A 29 year old male was diagnosed with acute
    promyelocytic leukemia in March 2005. He was
    successfully induced and consolidated with
    standard therapy including ATRA.
  • Autologous stem cells collected in 8/06
  • 3/07 he relapsed and dz persisted despite 2
    cycles of arsenic. Gemtuzumab (Mylotarg) worked.
  • Concern that dz was too refractory so got allo
    transplant w/ bu/cy conditioning

4
Case contd
  • D 30, he developed grade IV GI acute GVH
  • Treated w/ methylpred, pentostatin, tacrolimus,
    budesonide, beclomethasone. Nothing worked.
  • Then idea to ablate the graft. Reconditioned with
    fludarabine, cytarabine, and 200 cGy TBI and
    reinfused with autologous stem cells in 12/07.
  • In 4-6 weeks, GVH improved
  • In 11/07, chimerism studies revealed full donor
    engraftment. In 12/07 chimerism studies after
    autologous SCT showed only recipient cells. At
    the end of 12/07, biopsy revealed grade II GVH.

5
Acute GVH
  • Mainstay of treatment is high dose steroids
  • However, only about 50 respond, the rest are
    steroid refractory.
  • Mortality with steroid refractory GVH is about
    50
  • Thus, intense area to be addressed to improve
    post-transplant survival

6
Overview of acute GVH
  • Risk up to 50-60 in matched related donors
    despite immunosuppresant prophylaxis
  • Risk factors
  • Increased age
  • Degree of mismatch
  • Doses of prophylactic immunosuppresants
  • Source of cells
  • Conditioning regimen more intense, the greater
    the risk

7
Clinical Manifestations of Acute GVH
  • Skin
  • First manifestation
  • Most common
  • Si/Sx
  • Maculopapular rash usually at the time of
    engraftment.
  • Involves epidermal and dermal layers
  • T cell infiltrate
  • Severe disease includes bullae formation and
    desquamation

8
Clinical Manifestations contd-Liver-
  • Second most common
  • Unlikely to have liver manifestation without
    skin.
  • Manifested as abnormal liver tests
  • Definitive diagnosis only by Bx

9
Clinical Manifestations Contd- GI Tract-
  • GI Tract
  • Most commonly lower GI tract
  • Non-specific symptoms
  • Diarrhea
  • Abd Pain
  • Diagnosis by rectal bx showing crypt necrosis and
    epithelial denudation similar to skin GVH

10
Pictures
11
Pathophysiology
  • Primarily T cell mediated process
  • 3 step process
  • Step 1
  • Recipient antigen presenting cells are activated
    by conditioning regimen
  • Increased recognition by donor T cells
  • Step 2
  • Donor T cells activate, proliferate, release
    cytokines
  • Step 3
  • LPS translocation of microbes through viscous
    wall 2/2 conditioning regimen recruits monocytes
    causing even more inflammation and thus more
    cytokine release
  • All these cytokines recruit cytotoxic lymphocytes
    and NK cells

12
Graft versus leukemia
  • GVHD is tightly associated with GVL
  • One of the therapeutic benefits of allogeneic
    transplant
  • Primarily mediated by cytotoxic pathway
  • Inflammatory cytokines allow CTLs and NK cells to
    amplify GVH
  • Possibility of interrupting inflammatory cascade
    but maintain GVL

13
Schematic of GVH vs. GVL
14
Current Treatment Strategies
  • Prevention
  • Relapse rate is higher in those without GVHD
  • Grade II-IV GVHD carries its own risks for
    mortality
  • Balance of upregulating GVL while lowering GVH is
    the ideal goal

15
Treatment contd
  • Steroids

16
Treatment contdSecond line agents
  • No standard order
  • Etanercept anti-TNF antibody
  • Daclizumab anti IL-2R
  • Pentostatin Purine analog inhibiting T cells
  • Ontak diptheria toxin combined with IL-2
    interacting protein
  • OSIRIS study mesencymal stem cells

17
Treatment contd
  • Steroid refractory portends a poor prognosis
  • Responders 50 alive at 2 years
  • Non-responders 10
  • Survival benefit is minimal at best
  • Although drugs can cause good early response
    rates, long term outcomes are similar to
    steroids.
  • Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials
    Network

18
None of that worked, now what?
  • Rescue autologous transplant
  • Ablate the allo-graft and rescue patient with
    their own cells, i.e. if you cant solve the
    problem, eliminate the problem
  • 7 patients had resolution of GVH 3 are alive, 4
    died of a combination of relapse and infection
  • 3 patients had minor improvement all died of GVH
  • Pseudoautologous transplant

19
Post-transplant chimerism
  • Unpredictable
  • 3 cases had 100 patient cells post transplant
  • 1 myeloablative,
  • 2 nonmyeloblative
  • 5 cases had 100 donor cells
  • 4 w/o conditioning regimen
  • 1 non-myeloblative
  • 1 mixed myeloablative
  • 1 pseudoauto non-myeloablative
  • 2 unknown

20
Autologous stem cells and GVH
  • T cell immunological balance
  • Maybe similar to inducing a mixed chimera.
  • Mouse model
  • Whole blood re-transfused resulted in 50
    survival
  • CD8, CD4 depleted cells infused resulted in 100
    survival
  • CD4CD25 known to regulate immune system
  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • Have immunoregulatory properties
  • Secrete cytokines that suppress lymphocyte
    proliferation
  • Induce T cell anergy
  • Induce production of CD4CD25 cells

21
Conclusion
  • Autologous stem cell transplant can possibly
    improve outcomes for steroid refractory aGVHD
  • Chimerism status is not a determinant of success
  • Can be recipient or donor
  • May affect primary disease control
  • Studies underway using exogenous therapeutics
  • OSIRIS
  • BM Network
  • Could do a study pheresing patients for stem
    cells before their allo

22
References
  • Weiss L, Slavin S. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999
    231139-1143
  • Kuwana M et al. Eur J Immunol 2001 31 2547-2557
  • Hoffmann P et al. J Exp Med 2002 196389-399
  • Hoffmann P et al. Semin Hematol 436269
  • Kahn SA and Moreb JS. Bone Marrow
    Transplantation. 2005 36267-8.
  • Passweg JR et al. Bone Marrow Transplantation.
    2004 34 995-998.
  • Ferrara J. Best Practice and Res Clin Hem. 2008
    Vol 21 No 4 677-682.
  • Pusic, I et al. Bone Marrow Trans. 2004 34
    995-998.
  • Johnson L. Best Practice Research Clinical
    Haematology. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 177192, 2008
  • Craddock, CF. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2008)
    41, 415423
  • Taylor PA et al. Blood. 2002 May
    1599(10)3493-9.
  • Van Lint MT, Uderzo C Locasciulli A et al.
    Blood 1998 92 2288-2293
  • Li et al. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008
    Sep9(13)2305-16.
  • UpToDate
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com