CSOs AND AID EFFECTIVENESS process and debate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

CSOs AND AID EFFECTIVENESS process and debate

Description:

Is aid reducing poverty and achieving development? ... Addresses desired values of social responsibility, humanitarianism, volunteerism ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: tj655
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CSOs AND AID EFFECTIVENESS process and debate


1
CSOs AND AID EFFECTIVENESSprocess and debate
  • Antonio Tujan Jr.
  • IBON International

2
Is aid reducing poverty and achieving development?
  • Development strategies and program effectiveness
  • Human rights based and empowered development
  • Aid management and delivery
  • Paris Declaration five principles
  • Key gaps and weaknesses

3
Two parallel processes
  • Accra High Level Forum III take stock of Paris
    Declaration implementation - AAA
  • CSO parallel process
  • Monitoring implementation, OECD survey
  • Advocacy on key issues and proposals to deepen
    aid effectiveness agenda
  • Advocacy to enrich the Paris Declaration and
    implementation such as governance and
    accountability processes

4
Accra HLF3 Taking Stock
  • HLF III format of marketplace, roundtables and
    Ministerial meeting on Sept 3-5
  • Preparations
  • Second monitoring survey
  • Joint Evaluation
  • Regional workshops
  • HLM March 08
  • Accra Action Agenda

5
CSO parallel process
  • National seminars, researches
  • Regional and international conferences and
    meetings
  • Publications and www.betteraid.org
  • Lists aideffectiveness_at_realityofaid.org
  • International steering group
  • Engagement with WP EFF and Ghana HLF III SC
  • Ghana CSO Aid Effectiveness Forum
  • Parallel Forum in Ghana
  • Participation in HLFIII

6
DAC policy on CSOs
  • Shift in DAC policy of engagement
  • Challenges to the aid system by new players
  • Bringing CSOs into the tent, but also looking
    into CSOs accountability and aid effectiveness
  • CIDA initiative on Advisory Group on CSOs and Aid
    Effectiveness

7
CSO and aid effectiveness
  • Advisory Group of WP EFF on CSO and aid
    effectiveness
  • To look into the two overarching functions of
    civil society as development actors in the broad
    sense, and more specifically in terms of its role
    in promoting accountability and demand for
    results.

8
Advisory Group mandate
  • To facilitate a multi-stakeholder process that
    aims to clarify
  • The roles of civil society in relation to the
    Paris Declaration
  • CSO aspirations to deepen the widen national and
    international aid effectiveness agendas
  • Key considerations and principles that will be
    internationally recognized by all of the relevant
    parties.

9
Advisory Group mandate
  • To advise WP-EFF and the HLF Steering Committee
    on the inclusion of Aid Effectiveness and Civil
    Society as well as other issues to deepen the aid
    effectiveness agenda in the agenda of the Accra
    Forum, in a manner that builds on the Paris
    Declaration and prepare proposals on Aid
    Effectiveness and Civil Society for discussion as
    part of the Accra agenda.

10
AG expected outcomes
  • Better understanding and recognition of the
    roles of civil society organizations (CSOs) as
    development actors and as part of the
    international aid architecture, and engagement of
    CSOs in general discussions of aid effectiveness
    (recognition and voice).
  • Improved understanding of the applicability
    and limitations of the Paris Declaration for
    addressing issues of aid effectiveness of
    importance to CSOs, including how CSOs can better
    contribute to aid effectiveness (applying and
    enriching the international aid effectiveness
    agenda).
  • Improved understanding of good practice
    relating to civil society and aid effectiveness
    by CSOs themselves, by donors and developing
    country governments (lessons of good practice).

11
AG process
  • Composition of AG
  • National and regional consultations
  • North CSO and North-South CSO consultation
  • International Forum (Feb 2008 Ottawa)
  • Engagement with SC and official workshops
  • Roundtable in Accra

12
Role of CSOs in society
  • Role and responsibility of csos
  • The role of civil society as a pillar of good
    governance
  • Its role in providing effective delivery of
    development programs and operations
  • Its role in the social empowerment of particular
    groups and the realization of human rights.
    Social justice and social transformation

13
Who are CSOs?
  • all non-market and non-state organizations and
    structures in which people organize to pursue
    shared objectives and ideals
  • Social solidarity as fundamental character of
    CSOs whether defined in various parameters,
    dimensions, concerns or divisions
  • Obvious in sectoral, thematic, issue-oriented,
    development csos
  • Addresses desired values of social
    responsibility, humanitarianism, volunteerism
  • Different dimensions of social solidarity
  • International solidarity for development and HR

14
Role of CSOs as development actors
  • As donors and as channels of assistance or
    solidarity for poor focus on HR and poverty
    reduction, development effectiveness
  • Simplistic dichotomy between work as development
    actors as donors, as channels of assistance and
    as watchdogs for anticorruption and
    accountability
  • Integrated role of CSOs as development actors
    solidarity for the poor in generating resources,
    ensuring pro-poor and rights based services
    delivery, promoting pro-poor and human rights
    policies and development programs and strategies

15
CSO policy
  • Solidarity as defining framework of CSOs implies
    rethinking of CSO policy in relation to diversity
    and representation, legitimacy and
    appropriateness, accountability, coherence and
    coordination, internationalization and
    globalization,

16
Recognition and Voice
  • Bringing csos into the tent
  • How ready are donors for NCSOs, for SCSOs, for
    International level
  • How ready are governments
  • How ready are CSOs themselves

17
Distinct development roles
  • CSOs premised on social solidarity solidarity
    with the poor in its various activities as
    development actors
  • other actors (NCSOs, governments and donors
    relate to CSOs conscious of this solidarity)
  • Governments role in development premised on
    governance (and services as component of
    governance) to population
  • (Donors, CSOs relate to government conscious of
    its role and responsibility in governance)

18
Applicability of Paris Declaration
  • Two dimensions of applicability not simplistic
    application on csos, distinguishing between cso
    notion as donor and as watchdog
  • Two dimensions of applicability as a
    comprehensive development partner and
    interlocutor with donors and governments and
    among csos and with the poor as development
    actors

19
Applicability of PD to CSOs
  • Indirect applicability to enrich the PD
    commitments and targets of donors and governments
  • Local ownership, alignment and partnership
  • Donor coordination and harmonization, and
    program-based approaches
  • Managing for results
  • Mutual accountability

20
Applicability of PD to CSOs
  • Direct applicability on CSO relationships must
    first be premised on social solidarity and in its
    role in society
  • Harmonization vs diversity
  • Ownership and Alignment not on governance of
    sovereign but on work for HR of poor and national
    development process for the poor
  • Accountability and solidarity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com