How well can people count their own teeth? Angus W G Walls, Amanda Wilmot Dental School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Office of National Statistics, United Kingdom a.w.g.walls@ncl.ac.uk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

How well can people count their own teeth? Angus W G Walls, Amanda Wilmot Dental School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Office of National Statistics, United Kingdom a.w.g.walls@ncl.ac.uk

Description:

... but accuracy in the middle band was low (60%). Gilbert and co-workers4 ... 4. Gilbert, G.H., R.P. Duncan, and A.M. Kulley, Validity of self-reported tooth ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: lindac169
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How well can people count their own teeth? Angus W G Walls, Amanda Wilmot Dental School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Office of National Statistics, United Kingdom a.w.g.walls@ncl.ac.uk


1
How well can people count their own teeth? Angus
W G Walls, Amanda WilmotDental School,
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Office of
National Statistics, United Kingdoma.w.g.walls_at_n
cl.ac.uk
3530
They were revisited 1-week later when the record
of their tooth count was retrieved. At this
second visit a short interviewer-led
questionnaire was completed to determine whether
there had been any changes to their dental status
since the oral examination as part of the 1998
ADHS and to find out if the participants had
encountered any problems counting their
teeth. Results
  • Aims
  • To estimate how accurately subjects in an
    epidemiological survey can count their own teeth
    when given some simple instructions and a
    disposable mouth mirror
  • Introduction
  • Oral health status and particularly the number of
    teeth present in the mouth and denture usage, has
    been linked to foods choice, dietary selection
    and nutritional intake1,2. However, the use of
    dental personnel within epidemiological surveys
    simply to count teeth is relatively expensive and
    there are legislative and psychological barriers
    to looking into peoples mouths that limit the
    possibility for survey workers to assess oral
    health status.
  • Self-reported edentulousness has been shown to
    be a reliable predictor of denture status.
    However there have been few studies that have
    explored the ability of adults to estimate the
    number of teeth in their mouths as a potential
    replacement for a formal dental examination. Todd
    and Lader3 reported the accuracy of a simple
    requested estimate of the numbers of teeth
    present in the mouth as part of the UK Adult
    Dental Health Survey for 1988. Adults were asked
    to categorise themselves as having fewer than 10,
    10 to 19 or more than 20 teeth. Participants were
    good at grouping themselves into low or high
    numbers of teeth, but accuracy in the middle band
    was low (60). Gilbert and co-workers4 showed
    reasonable accuracy on a population level for
    self-reported counts but poorer accuracy at an
    individual level The purpose of this study was to
    estimate the accuracy with which people could
    count their own teeth when given some simple
    instructions and provided with a disposable mouth
    mirror.
  • Methods
  • This study was performed as part of the
    feasibility study for the National Diet and
    Nutrition Survey for Adults. 191 individuals who
    had been seen during the 1998 Adult Dental Health
    Survey were approached to see if they would
    participate in this study. Each person was given
    a disposable mouth mirror and a set of written
    instructions suggesting a method for counting
    their teeth.
  • Results
  • 87 stated that counting teeth was either very or
    fairly easy. Some reported problems with vision
    and counting their upper teeth. 90 of the sample
    were accurate to within 2 teeth.
  • Subjects with more teeth tended to under count
    and those with fewer over count.
  • When broken down into tooth groups (1-8, 1-14,
    15-20, 21-26, 27-31, 32) 82 were in the correct
    group, 7 one group to low and 10 one group too
    high
  • There were no gender or social class differences
    in accuracy of tooth count. Older subjects were
    less accurate than younger people.
  • Despite reported difficulty in counting upper
    teeth the levels of accuracy were similar when
    data for the two arches were compared.
  • Subjects who reported having difficulty counting
    their teeth tended to be less accurate
  • Subjectively participants reported that
    practising counting their teeth made the process
    easier and they found it easier when emphasis was
    placed on the value of good lighting by the
    interviewer
  • Conclusions
  • the subjects in this study were able to count
    their own teeth with a high degree of accuracy.
  • 82 of subjects would have been placed in the
    correct group according to the numbers of teeth
    they had.
  • References
  • 1. Sheiham, A., et al., The relationship among
    dental status, nutrient intake, and nutritional
    status in older people. J Dent Res, 2001. 80(2)
    p. 408-13.
  • 2. Krall, E., C. Hayes, and R. Garcia, How
    dentition status and masticatory function affect
    nutrient intake. Journal of the American Dental
    Association, 1998. 129 p. 1261-1269.
  • 3. Todd, J.E. and D. Lader, Adult dental health
    1988 United Kingdom. 1991, London HMSO.
  • 4. Gilbert, G.H., R.P. Duncan, and A.M. Kulley,
    Validity of self-reported tooth counts during a
    telephone screening interview. J Public Health
    Dent, 1997. 57(3) p. 176-80.

Accuracy of tooth count
Accuracy of tooth count by age
Accuracy of tooth count by number of remaining
teeth
Funded by the Food Standards Agency and the
Department of Health
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com