Propagation of a Front, Encountering a Cold Air Layer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

Propagation of a Front, Encountering a Cold Air Layer

Description:

Frontogenesis. Sawyer-Eliassen Equation. Model. Result. Discussion ... Frontogenesis. Geostrophic. confluence of temperature field due to geostrophic wind field ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: I77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Propagation of a Front, Encountering a Cold Air Layer


1
Propagation of a Front, Encountering a Cold Air
Layer
  • Jeroen Derksen
  • u.s.o. Aarnout van Delden

2
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

3
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

4
Introduction
  • Typical setting over western Europe during
    winter.
  • Cold air over Land.
  • Relatively warm Sea.
  • Decreasing propagation of a front
  • Hard to forecast.
  • Arrival of warm air forecasted to early
  • Stalling front over cold air
  • snow, sleet
  • Hazardous weather.

5
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

6
Case Study
  • 5 and 6 January 1995
  • Satellite Infrared Photos
  • ECMWF-data
  • Height and Temperature of 1000hPa surface
  • Equivalent Potential temperature
  • Cross-section over the Netherlands

7
Case Study
Infrared Satellite Pictures
0903UTC 5 Jan
1942UTC 5 Jan
0936UTC 6 Jan
8
Case Study II
Isotherms and Height 1000hPa Sfc.
00UTC 5 Jan
9
Case Study III
Equivalent Potential Temperature 700hPa Sfc.
12UTC 5 Jan.
10
Case Study IV
Equivalent Potential Temperature 700hPa Sfc.
00UTC 6 Jan.
11
Case Study VI
Equivalent Potential Temperature 700hPa Sfc.
12UTC 5th
00UTC 5th
00UTC 6th
12UTC 6th
12
Case Study VII
Cross-section 52N, 5 Jan
00UTC
12UTC
13
Case Study VIII
Cross-section 52N, 6 Jan
00UTC
12UTC
14
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

15
Basic Equations
  • Full set of Equations are not solvable
  • Range of approximated sets developed.
  • Geostrophic Balans
  • Geostrophic momentum approximation

16
Geostrophic Balans
  • Geostrophic Balans.
  • Hydrostatic Balans
  • Thermal Wind Balans

17
Thermal Wind Balance
  • Difference in sign.
  • Geostrophic disturbance leads away from thermal
    wind balance.
  • Ageostrophic motion needed.

18
Geostrophic Momentum Approximation
19
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

20
Frontogenesis
  • Geostrophic
  • confluence of temperature field due to
    geostrophic wind field
  • rotation of isentropes due to geostrophic shear
  • Ageostrophic
  • tilt of vertical temperature gradient onto
    horizontal due to horizontal gradient in vertical
    velocity
  • differential diabatic heating

21
Frontogenesis II
22
Frontogenesis III
23
Frontogenesis IV
24
Frontogenesis V
  • Radiation
  • Latent Heat

25
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

26
Sawyer-Eliassen Eqn.
  • Cross-frontal Circulation
  • Based on Geostrophic Momentum Approximation.
  • Assumptions
  • Straight Front
  • 2 Dimensional Front
  • Coriolis Parameter Constant

27
System
  • 2D
  • Straight
  • Cross-frontal circulation.

28
Sawyer-Eliassen Eqn. II
  • ? Streamfunction
  • a Measure of Static Stability
  • b Cross-Frontal Temperature Gradient
  • c Geostrophic Absolute Vorticity
  • F Geostrophic Forcing

29
Examples
Reference Circulation
30
Examples II
Sign forcing changed
31
Examples III
a smaller
32
Examples IV
c larger
33
Examples V
Neg.
Pos.
b larger
34
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

35
Model
  • No Differential Diabatic heating
  • No North-South Temperature Gradient

36
Model II
  • All the variables are obtained, using ECMWF-data,
    except for y.

37
Model III
  • Solving S-E, using the Relaxation Scheme.
  • Guessed Solution -gt Residu
  • Residu -gt Next Solution
  • etc.
  • -gt Right Solution

38
Model IV
  • Guessed solution on iteration step m
  • Suppose next iteration step, m1, gives correct
    answer, using the old values of ? on step m on
    the surrounding gridpoints

39
Model V
40
Model VI
Boundary conditions
  • Bottom ? 0.
  • Both sides vertically integrated ua,, obtained
    from ECMWF-data.
  • Top
  • Difference both sides
  • Continuity
  • Difference spread over top

41
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

42
Result
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Forcing Geostrophic confluence
  • Influence Boundaries?
  • Larger Domain 19WL-29EL

43
Result 00UTC 5 Jan
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
44
Result 06UTC 5 Jan
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
45
Result 12UTC 5 Jan
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
46
Result 18UTC 5 Jan
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
47
Result 00UTC 6 Jan
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
48
Contents
  • Introdction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

49
Discussion
  • 5 January Results are good.
  • 6 january Results are not good.
  • Which of the neglected terms is responsible?
  • Confluence by total wind field
  • Shear-term
  • Tilting-term
  • Differential Diabatic Heating

50
Discussion II
  • Confluence by total wind field adds nothing new.
  • Shear term stronger on the fifth than on the
    sixth.
  • Tilting term to weak.
  • Differential Diabatic heating?

51
Discussion III
Diabatic heating
  • Time mean of 6 hours

Differential Diab. Heating
52
Discussion IV
Circulation, taking Diff. Diab. Heating into
account
06UTC 5 Jan.
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
53
Discussion V
Circulation, taking Diff. Diab. Heating into
account
18UTC 5 Jan.
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
54
Discussion VI
Circulation, taking Diff. Diab. Heating into
account
00UTC 6 Jan.
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
55
Discussion VII
Circulation, taking Diff. Diab. Heating into
account
06UTC 6 Jan.
red calculated circulation green observed
ageostrophic circulation
56
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

57
Conclusion
  • A circulation cell is present over the boundary
    of the cold air.
  • It is present, partly due to
  • confluence of the temperature field by the
    geostrophic wind field
  • Differential Diabatic Heating
  • This cell is responsible for an easterly wind at
    the surface.
  • The advection of cold air by this wind physically
    blocks the oncoming warm air.

58
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Case Study
  • Theory
  • Basic Equations
  • Frontogenesis
  • Sawyer-Eliassen Equation
  • Model
  • Result
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations

59
Recommendations
  • Use higher resolution, in time and space.
  • Make a more general model
  • Dont assume the front to be North-South.
  • Dont assume the front to be straight.
  • Use a 3D model.
  • Beware that processes are easily recognized.
  • Study more events.

60
Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com