Qualitative vs' Quantitative Method - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Qualitative vs' Quantitative Method

Description:

Qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to ... ethnomethodology symbolic interactionism. field study transformative research ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: liverpoolh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Qualitative vs' Quantitative Method


1
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Method
2
WHAT is qualitative research?
  • Qualitative emphasis on processes meanings
    that are not rigorously examined, or measured in
    terms of quantity, amount, intensity, or
    frequency
  • The socially constructed nature of reality
  • The intimate relationship between the researcher
    and what is studied
  • Seek answers to questions that stress how social
    experience is created and given meaning.

3
Qualitative Researchers
Qualitative researchers study things in their
natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or
interpret, phenomenon in terms of the meanings
people bring to them..it involves the studied use
and collection of a variety of empirical
materials, that describe routine and problematic
moments and meanings in individuals
lives Denzin Lincoln,(1998). The Landscape
of Qualitative Research
4
WHO does qualitative research?
  • Researchers in the social or behavioural sciences
  • Practitioners in fields concerned with human
    behaviour and functioning
  • This style of research can be used to study
    organisations, groups, and individuals

5
WHY do qualitative research?
  • Philosophy
  • The nature of the research problem
  • Some areas naturally lend themselves more to
    qualitative types of research
  • E.g. research that attempts to uncover the nature
    of a persons experiences with a phenomenon
  • Illness, religious conversion, addiction
  • Qualitative methods can give the intricate
    details of phenomena that are difficult to convey
    with quantitative methods

6
Learning Link to Research
  • Kolb (1979) linked theory to practice and
    characterised this link by an attempt at
    explaining observations. One could loosely infer
    from his cycle that from explanations,
    predictions and expectations could result. These
    actions have links to a research approach.

7
Kolb Cycle
Concrete Experience (Feeling)
Active Experimentation (Doing)
Reflective Observation (Watching)
Abstract Conceptualisation (Thinking)
8
Reasoning
  • Answers to questions surrounding theories
    hypotheses in research can enable us to
    distinguish research methods, broadly into those
    that are deductive inductive. Additionally, if
    we relate this to Kolbs learning cycle, the
    deductive approaches correspond to those traits
    on the left hand side of the cycle the
    inductive approaches to those on the right hand
    side

9
Kolb Cycle Reasoning
Concrete Experience (Feeling)
Active Experimentation (Doing)
Reflective Observation (Watching)
Deductive
Inductive
Abstract Conceptualisation (Thinking)
10
Inductive Reasoning
  • Inductivism seeks to construct explanations and
    theories about observations from an empirical
    world. The theory is the outcome of induction.
    The result is Qualitative Research.
  • Inductivism can be viewed in two ways
  • ?The models used here are essentially
  • (a) Stimulus --------gt Experience/Interpret----gt
    Response
  • (b) Interpretation and Meaning ------------gt
    Action
  • ?Inductivism is seen to be the reverse of
    deductivism.

11
Positivist Postpositivist
  • In the positivist version it is contended that
    there is a reality out there to be studied,
    captured, and understood
  • Postpositivists argue that reality can never be
    fully apprehended, only approximated
  • Positivist methods are but one way of telling a
    story about society or the societal world

12
Approaches to Qualitative Research
  • action research grounded theory
  • case study hermeneutics
  • clinical research interpretive interactionism
  • content analysis life history study
  • conversational analysis oral history
  • descriptive research panel research
  • discourse analysis participant observation
  • educational ethnography participative research
  • ethnography phenomenology
  • ethnomethodology symbolic interactionism
  • field study transformative research
  • focus group research (Adapted from Tesch ,1990)

13
WHAT is your research about?
  • Asking difficult questions?
  • What is the nature of the phenomena, or entities,
    or social reality which you wish to
    investigate?
  • What might represent knowledge or evidence of the
    entities or social reality which you wish to
    investigate?
  • What topic, or broad substantive area is your
    research concerned with?

14
WHAT is your research about?
  • Asking difficult questions?
  • What is the intellectual puzzle? What do you wish
    to explain? What are your research questions?
  • What is the purpose of your research? What are
    you doing it for?

15
1. What is the nature of the phenomena, or
entities, or social reality, which you wish to
investigate?
  • What is your ontological position or perspective?
  • Alternative ontological perspectives tell
    different stories
  • Different ways of conceptualising social entities
    are connected to different philosophies of social
    science
  • Different versions of ontology may be logically
    competing rather than complementary

16
2. What might represent knowledge or evidence of
the entities or social reality which you wish
to investigate?
  • Questions about what we regard as knowledge or
    evidence of things in the social world are
    epistemological questions
  • Your epistemology is your theory of knowledge,
    and should therefore concern the principles and
    rules by which you decide whether and how social
    phenomena can be demonstrated
  • Your answers to questions of ontology and
    epistemology should be consistent
  • Your epistemology should help you to generate
    knowledge/explanations about the ontological
    components of the social world (e.g. social
    processes, social actions, discourses, meanings)

17
3. What topic, or broad substantive area is your
research concerned with?
  • The answer must follow on from considerations of
    your ontological and epistemological position
  • E.g. a study of racist attitudes amongst school
    children would suggest an ontological position
    which says that individuals held attitudes and
    that those attitudes are meaningful components of
    the social world
  • A study which focuses on institutional racism
    within schools might suggest an ontological
    position which sees institutions, collectivities
    or structures, rather than (or as well as)
    individuals, as meaningful components of the
    social world

18
4. What is the intellectual puzzle? What do you
wish to explain? What are your research questions?
  • In answering this question you should be
    addressing yourself to the intellectual and
    theoretical contributions of your work
  • Once you are thinking in terms of puzzles and
    explanations, it will be a relatively easy task
    to formulate a set of research questions, and
    these will form the backbone of your research
    design
  • A research question is a question which the
    research is designed to address. Taken together,
    your research questions should express the
    essence of your inquiry

19
5. What is the purpose of your research? What are
you doing it for?
  • Academic arguments about increasing or
    challenging intellectual and theoretical
    understanding
  • The achievement of social and/or political change
  • Personal advancement

20
Tuesday 01/11 Interviewing
  • Lecture Notes Readings on website
  • Interviews Transcription notation
  • Preparatory document on website
  • THINK ABOUT YOUR TOPIC FOR INTERVIEW NOW!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com