Peer reviewed manuscript | Journal Submission | Qualitative research journal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Peer reviewed manuscript | Journal Submission | Qualitative research journal

Description:

Journal submission is a detailed and time-consuming process. Each journal has distinct submission requirements, and every aspect of a journal’s requirements must be determined and satisfied even if changes to your manuscript are required. This service will save you time and frustration. Read more @ – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2
Slides: 13
Provided by: pubricauk
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Peer reviewed manuscript | Journal Submission | Qualitative research journal


1
IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS, HOW ARE MANUSCRIPTS USUALLY
PEER-REVIEWED?
An Academic presentation by Dr. Nancy Agnes,
Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group
www.pubrica.com Email sales_at_pubrica.com
2
  • In academic journals, manuscripts are typically
    peer-reviewed through a rigorous evaluation
    process involving external experts in the field.
  • The peer review process helps ensure the quality,
    validity, and significance of the research before
    it is accepted for publication.
  • Here is a general overview of how manuscripts are
    usually peer-reviewed

contd...
3
(No Transcript)
4
  • SUBMISSION
  • After a researcher submits their manuscript to a
    journal, it undergoes an initial screening by the
    journal's editorial team.
  • They assess whether the manuscript meets the
    journal submission scope and guidelines.
  • It proceeds to the peer review in the science
    stage if it passes the initial screening.

contd...
5
  • REVIEWER SELECTION
  • THE JOURNAL'S EDITOR(S) IDENTIFIES POTENTIAL
    REVIEWERS WITH EXPERTISE IN THE SUBJECT AREA
    RELEVANT TO THE MANUSCRIPT.
  • REVIEWERS ARE TYPICALLY RESEARCHERS, SCHOLARS, OR
    EXPERTS WHO HAVE PUBLISHED IN THE FIELD
    THEMSELVES
  • REVIEWER INVITATION
  • REVIEWERS ARE INVITED TO ASSESS THE MANUSCRIPT BY
    THE EDITOR(S).
  • THEY CAN ACCEPT OR DECLINE THE INVITATION BASED
    ON THEIR AVAILABILITY AND EXPERTISE.

contd...
6
  • PEER REVIEW PROCESS
  • REVIEWERS EVALUATE THE MANUSCRIPT FOR ITS
    SCIENTIFIC RIGOUR, METHODOLOGY, ORIGINALITY,
    CLARITY OF WRITING, AND CONTRIBUTION TO THE
    FIELD.
  • THEY PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES,
    AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT.
  • THIS ASSESSMENT MAY BE DONE THROUGH A
    SINGLE-BLIND REVIEW (WHERE THE REVIEWERS KNOW THE
    AUTHOR'S IDENTITY BUT NOT VICE VERSA) OR A
    DOUBLE-BLIND PEER REVIEW (WHERE THE IDENTITIES OF
    BOTH AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS ARE CONCEALED).

contd...
7
  • REVIEWER COMMENTS
  • REVIEWERS TYPICALLY PROVIDE DETAILED COMMENTS,
    SUGGESTIONS, AND CRITIQUES TO THE EDITOR(S)
    REGARDING THE MANUSCRIPT'S STRENGTHS AND
    WEAKNESSES.
  • THEY MAY RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE, REVISION, OR
    REJECTION BASED ON THEIR ASSESSMENT.
  • AUTHOR REVISIONS
  • IF REQUESTED, THE EDITOR(S) COMMUNICATE THE
    REVIEWER'S COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS TO THE
    AUTHOR.
  • THE AUTHOR THEN REVISES THE MANUSCRIPT
    ACCORDINGLY, ADDRESSING THE REVIEWER'S CONCERNS
    AND MAKING IMPROVEMENTS.

contd...
8
  • EDITOR'S DECISION
  • THE EDITOR(S) CONSIDER THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS,
    THE REVISED MANUSCRIPT, AND THEIR ASSESSMENT TO
    DECIDE THE MANUSCRIPT.
  • THE DECISION CAN BE ACCEPTANCE, ACCEPTANCE WITH
    MINOR REVISIONS, ACCEPTANCE WITH MAJOR REVISIONS,
    OR REJECTION.
  • MULTIPLE REVISIONS AND REVIEWS MAY SOMETIMES BE
    REQUIRED BEFORE REACHING A FINAL DECISION.
  • PUBLICATION
  • ONCE A MANUSCRIPT IS ACCEPTED, IT MOVES FORWARD
    IN THE PUBLICATION PROCESS, WHICH INCLUDES
    COPYEDITING, TYPESETTING, AND FORMATTING.
  • FINALLY, THE MANUSCRIPT IS PUBLISHED IN THE
    JOURNAL, MAKING IT ACCESSIBLE TO THE ACADEMIC
    COMMUNITY.

contd...
9
  • It's important to note that the peer review
    process can vary slightly between journal format
    and disciplines.
  • Some journals may also incorporate additional
    steps, such as a second round of review or an
    editorial board meeting to discuss the
    manuscript's fate.
  • The overall goal of peer review manuscripts is to
    ensure the quality and integrity of published
    qualitative research journals by subjecting them
    to rigorous evaluation by experts in the field.
  • To know more about Journal submission, check our
    study guide, What Are The Process Involved In
    Journal Submission?

contd...
10
  • In academic journals of scientific research,
    manuscripts are typically PubMed peer-reviewed
    through anonymous evaluation by independent
    experts in the same or related field as the
    author(s) of the manuscript.
  • The peer-review process helps to ensure the
    quality and validity of research published in
    academic journals.
  • Check our sample work to know and learn more
    about "Journal submission report".

contd...
11
  • Pubrica adheres to the highest standards and
    regulations of journal publishing ethics in all
    phases of services and operations.
  • Pubrica follows the International Council of
    Medical Journal Editors' (ICJME) authorship
    rules, and the scope of services will be
    continuously updated in accordance with the
    Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE) and
    International Society of Medical Publication
    Professionals (ISMPP) principles.

12
Contact Us
UNITED KINGDOM
44 1618186353
INDIA
91-9884350006
EMAIL
sales_at_pubrica.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com