How to Overcome Operational Challenges in Getting Consistent Beacon Behavior? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

How to Overcome Operational Challenges in Getting Consistent Beacon Behavior?

Description:

This blog is about conquering the operational challenges such as Beacon range detection and signal fluctuation that are encountered while getting the consistent Beacon behavior for Android and iOS mobile devices. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Slides: 17
Provided by: AzilenTech

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to Overcome Operational Challenges in Getting Consistent Beacon Behavior?


1
(No Transcript)
2
Intro
  • The usage of Beacon is increasingly getting
    prevalent especially in segments such as
    hospitality and retail to provide special offers
    in line with various loyalty programs to its
    regular customers and the customers get
    notifications about unique offers while they are
    in the premises of casino, restaurant, store etc.
    The several challenges are likely to be
    encountered while utilizing Beacon power at its
    best.
  • Challenge 1 Difference distance detection ranges
    for iOS and Andoid
  • - In the real world scenario, iOS devices and
    Android devices have remarkable difference in
    their Beacon detection ranges.
  • Challenge 2 Signal fluctuation
  • - The consistency of Beacon signals does rely
    upon various factors and hindrance in those
    factors may cause the signal fluctuations
    eventually affecting the expected outcomes.
  • - Team Azilen carries out in-depth research to
    overcome these challenges and finally came up
    with the optimum solution. The challenges and
    solutions both are described below with all
    relevant details.

3
Challenge 1 Difference distance detection ranges
for iOS and Andoid
  • iOS works in accordance with iBeacon protocol
    while Android considers Beacon as a Bluetooth
    device. Hence, they both react in a different
    manner when it comes to detecting Beacon signals.
  • For example, in general, we can consider that iOS
    devices detect Beacon signals at 7 8 meters
    whereas Android devices detect Beacon signals at
    15 18 meters.

4
(No Transcript)
5
  • gt If the Beacon is there at the range of 10
    meters, Android device will start receiving the
    Beacons signals from about 15 to 18 meters and
    it will consider the Beacon IN.
  • gt On the other hand, iOS device considers the
    Beacon IN when the proximity in NEAR. iOS is not
    stable to get NEAR proximity at 10 meters and
    gives fluctuated or uncertain experiences in
    detecting the Beacon.
  • Solutions
  • We had several experiments with Beacons RSSI
    function in line with Beacons optimum
    calibration.

6
  • GUI testing and ease of functionality A robust
    and open-source software testing
    frameworkSelenium automation framework is used
    for this purpose.
  • Solving execution time issue Selenium automation
    framework is integrated with Saucelabs that just
    needs the platform configuration for the test
    case to run on multiple environments parallel
    with other test cases.
  • Reduced infrastructure cost With the integration
    of tools like Selenium and Saucelabs with Jenkins
    server, it offers continuous integration of data
    for ease in testing.

7
  • Beacon Calibration Calibration is a process of
    defining the signal strength that the Beacon can
    transmit to the receiver mobile device at the
    reference point of 1 meter. The first step in our
    solution is to calibrate the Beacon as per
    requirement.
  • RSSI Received Signal Strength Indicator is the
    strength of the Beacons signal which gets
    displayed on the signal receiving device. Android
    works complying with RSSI. So we defined ideal
    RSSI value after Beacons calibration. We got -97
    to -100 dbm at Beacons last spot of range. We
    defined separate RSSI for each beacon.

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • Consequential Outcomes We could detect beacon at
    near about exact (/- 1 to 2 meter variation)
    range of its calibrated region for both Android
    and iOS platforms.

10
Challenge 2 Signal fluctuation
  • Up to some extent, the consistency of Beacon
    signals does rely upon several factors such as
    surrounding infrastructure as sizeable metal or
    wooden article can cause reflections or
    attenuations that affect the signal level.
    Sometimes, other disruptions occurred or even an
    object passing through between the mobile device
    and the Beacon can cause signal fluctuation. The
    mobile device keeps getting OUT and IN due to
    such hindrance.

11
(No Transcript)
12
  • Solution
  • Beacon IN/OUT cycle The mobile device
    continuously receives the signals for each beacon
    and update the beacons state as IN/OUT as per
    RSSI and IN/OUT threshold.
  • As discussed earlier we have defined IN/OUT
    threshold for each beacon as 8 seconds for IN and
    10 seconds for OUT. Therefore, if any object
    comes between Beacon and the mobile device
    application will start cycle to region OUT and on
    the next interval application will get strong
    signals so OUT cycle will reset and keep beacon
    IN. Thus, based on IN/OUT cycle we could resolve
    fluctuation issue.

13
  • Conclusion
  • Development experiments often make us realize
    that sometimes, complex or complicated sounding
    challenges can be addressed by very simple
    solutions. And this is how with a
    straightforward and solution oriented approach,
    we could manage to get consistent Beacon behavior
    for both Android and iOS even in environment.

14
  • Let's Discuss Your Requirement!
  •  info_at_azilen.com  1-972-325-2243

15
  • Original Source
  • http//www.azilen.com/blog/overcome-challenges-in-
    getting-consistent-beacon-behavior/

16
Thanks You www.azilen.com Let us know if you
have any Question!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com