Cold fusion, Tesla, Scalar wave, Torsion field, "Free energy", Zeropoint Energy Extraction..= Really All Pseudo Science?(part 4 of 14).

1
Cold Fusion, Tesla, Torsion Field,
Scalar Wave", Free Energy, Harvesting ZPE...
Really All Pseudoscience?

• Analysis of New Energy Paradigm, Including
  Controversial Questionable Claims of Tech
  Efficiency, Non-Energy Applications, Lobby
  Groups...

PART 4 OF 14
BEN RUSUISIAK NEW NATURE PARADIGM TECH
ANALYSIS VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA, Updated May21,
2017
www.linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm
2

• ABSTRACT LENR-Cold Fusion is virtually accepted
  by mainstream(MS) While MS rejects "E-cat"
  claims on already selling 1MW electricity LENR
  generator, now energy can be produced with
  basically free fuel. Thermodynamic closed
  system based over-unity or Persistent
  Current/motion is officially observed in quantum
  nano circuit, beyond Shockley-Queisser limit
  solar cell, non-linear optic/laser/spintronics,
  time crystal, magnetocaloric effects. Academic
  taboo of vacuum photon extraction/electron
  fluctuation, Maxwell's demon, Quantum ratchet,
  Casimir force harvesting micro electronic device,
  2nd law violation are now on MS science
  journals. Low cost magnet /resonance based major
  emission reducers with 10 extra efficiency,
  Thermo Electric/Thermo Photo Voltaics
  heat-to-energy systems, high efficiency
  Waste-To-Fuel/Energy systems with, Catalystic,
  SuperCritical water, Cold or Steam Plasma are
  starting to be deployed. Above might foreshadow
  first FULL science review of hyper energy
  efficiency installation claims e.g. 1-Extracting
  nano oscillation/radiant energy as electricity,
  2-Harvesting DC reverse voltage power(Counter
  EMF), 3-Resonance catalyzed HHO/Oxy-hydrogen gas,
  4-Cold plasma standing wave creation of
  light/water/inert gas in cavity, 5-Compressed air
  COPgt1 heat exchanger converted to mechanical
  power, 6-Catalyzed emulsion fuel with far beyond
  50 H2O, 7-Hydrocarbon increased by
  photo-catalyzed O2 Nanobubble water fuel
  emulsion, when infused with CO2 in room temp/
  pressure. 8-Combined air-in-water floating
  gravity force, 9-Propellantless drive, 10-Hydro
  cavitation heater, 11-Betz limit excess
  hydro/wind turbine, etc. They often seem to run
  on mechanics with common side effects official
  physics cannot explain are low cost,
  convertible to superior new techs that can foster
  mind/body based nonlocal human capabilities,
  also can replace majority of propulsion, weather,
  medical, remediation, time dilation, algorithm,
  key mining-industrial-farming processes-If
  officially full peer reviewed by MS science.
  Recent paradigm shift might allow investigations
  on increasing testimonials about such non-closed
  system pseudo science RDs by groups across
  Govt/Military /Aerospace /Intel agencies
  private contractors, often hidden under secrecy
  law, to which above organizations executives
  often have no access i.e "unacknowledged"
  projects(eg 1000 classified inventions in
  Enviro-Energy-Propulsion-Medical exist amongst
  NATO allies). Yet there are efforts to partially
  disclose unlimited energy related tech as
  tiny-minority-controlled highly exclusive
  modality while same final effects can be created
  by wide range of unexclusive relatively simple
  tech or mind/emotion based methods if a fraction
  of budget is spent to develop. Such paradigm can
  totally liberate mass from "dead-end public
  consumption science" education restricted by
  centrally controlled science law. From current
  vantage point, there is some possibility of world
  dividing into roughly two different camps at both
  elites general population First group is
  already more focused on exclusive patent or
  machine/DNA controlled surveillance or physical
  effect creation to enable world influence by a
  fraction of population. Emerging second group
  will likely to be more focused on low cost simple
  unexclusive tech or holistic mind/emotion/biologic
  ally driven effect creation. Overall, MS
  commercialization by multiples of unlimited
  energy production methods is inevitable, yet not
  only its economic impact but also who is going to
  be in control of technological dominance
  individual life would likely become a(covert)
  central issue in the coming yrs.

3
Qualification of information

• This presentation primarily focuses on less
  known but latest science consensus forming
  technologies on strict effect basis, while a bulk
  of highest efficiency low cost techs a majority
  of "outrageous" or controversial claims category
  contradict predominant view, especially of
  Wikipedia Western media/NGOs. Hence
  attendants/readers are recommended to re-assess
  the data individually.
• Regarding Controversial But Future Critical
  Technologies Discussed
  
  
  Term Free energy or Over-unity in this
  presentation is defined as seeming as if
  
  
  -1 Drawing
  more energy than existing or continuous motion
  with no energy input. -2 Work is
  done by other than Thermodynamic Free Energy
  open system symptom.
  -3 Using free material generally not
  considered as fuel.
  
  Inventors-scientists-witnesses
  their claims might involve higher likelihood of
  
  
  -4 Fabrication,
  reliability exaggeration, or statistical error
  chance of observed effect.
  
  
  -5 Significant quality gap between inventions,
  yet -
  
  -6 At least collective majority seems
  to consistently produces claimed effects.
  
• Currently more detailed reference list is being
  produced will be published separately
  The research is updated
  based on reviewing academic papers journals,
  books, speeches, presentations, patents,
  lab/product testimonies/complaints, publications
  public records of NGOs/media/research
  institutes/think tanks/military/space gov't
  agencies/industry associations. Most effects
  quoted have accumulative-consistent evidence from
  unrelated era source, but mechanics
  categorization are hypothetical. Commercialized
  company/products are shown in Boldface Dark Blue.
  Due to space constraints, referenced
  individuals names are given only last name or
  part of first name unless web search
  identification becomes difficult(often
  non-Western names are given in full), company
  names are listed in a way that is findable by
  internet search.

4
Contents

• p06 Sscience accepted free Micro Energy
  Harvesters
  
• p45 Industrial Energy Harvesters Solid State
  Device, HRSG
  
• p85 Solar/Wind/Hydro with beyond official
  limit, Biomass/WtE, Methane
• p125 Biomass, Inventor Tech Ambient
  Electricity/ZPE extraction, HHO gas
• p164 Inventor Tech Cold Plasma, Compressed Air,
  Aneutronic Fusion, Torsion
• p209 Torsion field, Scalar energy, Standing wave
  resonance
• p242 BioTorsion Field? Remote View, Martial
  Art, Mentalists, Qigong, Hypnosis..
• p278 "Copy Paste" by Torsion/Scalar,
  Terahertz, FIR waves, Photo Catalysis
• p304 Highly anomalous ORMUS, another state of
  matter?, LENR-Cold Fusion
• p342 Official Acceptance of LENR ZPE Resonance
  extraction Ramifications
• p387 Outrageous Claims(OC) ZPE related effect
  witnesses, Tech influence lobby
• p426 OC ZPE related Tech lobby, Engineering of
  Material/Timespace
• p447 OC ElectroMagnetic mind influence,
  MindRitual based technologies
• p479 OC ZPE related Weapons, Summary
  Conclusions

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
5

• This file is part 4 of 14 series Entire 14
  series can be viewed in one file at following
  presentation sites.
• At ISSUU
• https//issuu.com/newnatureparadigm/docs/energy_20
  17-july11
• Or SCRIBD
• http//www.scribd.com/doc/227644705/2016-UPDATE-Co
  ld-fusion-Tesla-Scalar-wave-Torsion-field-Free-ene
  rgy-Over-unity-Really-All-Pseudo-Science-A-New-Par
  adigm-Energy-Trigger-b
• Or CALAMEO
• http//en.calameo.com/read/0048384130fe2dc3ff3dd
• Thank you. Ben Rusuisiak.

6
Energy From Vast Biomass 27, Gasification(not
biomass)

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY NONWOOD WASTE ?3g Gas to
  Liquid Coal to liquid fuel link
  
  
• Also mini scale operation from 1970s in west with
  same/similar process for coal liquefaction or
  methane to gasoline type process(Shell, Exxon
  Mobile).
• Other after yr2000 commercialization examples
  Sasol active outside of S Africa, Large Gas To
  Liquid (GTL) refinery PetroSA. Underground Coal
  To Liquid process small scale(Linc Energy -
  Carbon Energy, Emerging Fuels Technology).
  Sub-SCW F-T?(REG Synthetic fuels), Most of
  Coal to Liquid tech(CTL) is Indirect synthesis,
  ie ICTL.
• China is prioritizing CTL(BRICC
  ?????????-??????????????????,. YitaiGroup.com
  ???????????, Jincheng Anthracite Mining Group
  ????????????????? ), also Direct Coal
  Liquefaction semi pseudoscience in western media
  level(Shenhua Group ???? , CCRI ?????????????,
  Yanzhou Mining Group ?????????? ). Western
  mainstream media/govn't/NGO generally didn't
  introduce the tech till around 2012 in connection
  with biomass related subject. --gtgt continue

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
7
Energy From Vast Biomass 28, Biomass Gas to Liquid

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY NONWOOD WASTE ?3g GTL - Gas
  to Liquid
  Although various GTL
  techs differ from each other, produced Waste
  based liquid fuel become lowest cost fuel in many
  regions and mildly disruptive(most companies
  persist in emphasizing "small scale") somewhat
  game changing since this reinforces public
  perception it can apply to a- all organic mass
  forest, plant, b -lower cost than
  conventional liquid fuel would be widely
  available since various syngas or methane can be
  processed(natural gas, coal gas, CoalBed
  Methane) (Enerkem, ThermoChem - Fulcrum Energy,
  Biofuels Power, Velocys, CompactGT ),
• BioMCN qualifies as largest producer of 2nd gen
  biofuel as of 2016?- biodiesel left over
  glycerine gasification reforming, i.e. not
  direct cellulose use. Some companies
  additionally use CO2 as fuel source(LanzaTech),
  GTL tech has support from major Western local
  governments, international corporations/mainstream
  group recently to indicate another official
  wider availability of energy source, Small
  trailer portable device(Maverick Synfuels)
  
  
  
• ?3h Less Conventional Gasification or
  Liquefaction
  
  i -Hot Plasma
  Gasification/Gas Cleaning Original use was high
  energy based expensive toxin decomposition or
  metal recovery from waste, but plasma assisted
  gasifying becomes cost competitive. This is now
  "conventional" plasma tech

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
8
Energy From Vast Biomass 29, Hot Cold Plasma
Gasify

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY NONWOOD WASTE ?3h Less
  Conventional Gasification or Liquefaction i -Hot
  Plasma Gasification/Gas Cleaning
• widely known key players (Plasco, Alter NRG
  -Westinghouse, Advanced Plasma Power -Tetronics
  ), less known successful installations(InEnTec,
  Peat International, CHO Power -EuroPlasma,
  BellWeather Gasification Techonologies, Phoenix
  Solutions Co ), Long lasting induction based
  electrodeless RF plasma torch(Applied Plasma
  Technologies, High Temperature Technologies Corp
  -Tekna Plasma). indicates original tech
  developers,
• ii-Steam Plasma less fume than hot plasma, much
  lower CAPEX OPEX portable size, plasma gas is
  water/steam more like low energy use
  SuperCritical water(SCW) based gasification
  Strong oxidizing effect(ie moisture insensitive,
  no NOx or Dioxin). But mostly pilot type
  commercialization as industrial unit since
  current focus is mostly on full decomposition
  rather than fuel generation ?(PlasmaAir AG, Foret
  Plasma Lab, Strebl Energy), Rare
  energy/gasification focus exists?(Green Science
  ??????, Plazarium)
• iii-MicroPlasma Related to a string of highly
  economically disruptive effects(Torsion
  field)(see p233-3?i), and Official Western
  research in dealing with organic material by this
  tech is avoided, Effects generated by ?a
  Rotating Magnetic Field( ???????? ECOUOM),
  linked to Motional Electric Field possibly with
  gravity and ambient electricity generator
  effect(k p375,376),

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
9
New Perspective -Lowest Cost Energy From
Vast Biomass 30, Micro Plasma with anomalies

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY NONWOOD WASTE
  
  
  ?3h Less Conventional Gasification or
  Liquefaction iii-MicroPlasma
• ?b Rotating Electrode(?????? - ????????????????
  ????? ??????),
• ?c PyroMagnetic Furnace Self running alternating
  magnetic field oxygen treating waste-to-energy
  decomposer(ZeroMozJapan, T.H. ELEMA ENG. CO,
  Jimdo?????????? Gasification is quite effective
  but that part is not commercialized, Minor heat
  utilization from trash "incineration". Some
  PyroMagnetic Furnace is completely self running
  no exhaust/chimney with no outside power needed,
  pseudoscientized but has useful effects like
  radiation remediation(p367) or torsion
  field(p197-241), decomposes dioxin even process
  generates only 300-400C heat full of
  "econo-politically incorrect scientific effects"
  to be avoided by academics.
  
  
  
• Currently commercialized focus is for mostly
  fertilizer generation, complete organic trash
  decomposition down to magnetized ash with almost
  no exhaust fume(indoor use ok). Ash has uncommon
  bioenhancing effects. This PyroMagnetic
  microplasma effect for non-organic matter(metal)
  is more widely used(Bmax) but overall still
  ignored tech.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
10
New Perspective -Lowest Cost Energy From Vast
Biomass 31, Cold Plasma Reforming/Magne Gas

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY WASTE ?3h Less Conventional
  Gasification/Liquefaction
• iv-Cold Plasma(CP)/NonThermal Plasma(NTP)/NonEquil
  ibrium Plasma gas reforming-cleaning-gasification(
  Electric/plasma arc discharge/Dielectric Barrier
  Discharge etc in water) Usually for wastewater,
  Unlike hot plasma, CP has ionization in electron
  only and not in molecules(little or no thermal
  motion/pressure non-equilibrium) and can
  accompany nonlinear oscillations other
  anomalous Torsion field/resonance
  /Electrohydraulic type effects.
• Very low power use, less fume than hot plasma,
  usually lower cost process than any mainstream
  equivalent methods(except occasionally SCW
  methods, see below) Usually container/trailer
  portable gasification system ?(MagneGas, TopLine
  Energy, AdaptiveArc, FabGroups - HydroQuebec),
  Both solid liquid waste ?(Enersol Technologies,
  Xfuels), GlidArc use(PowerCan 200, Mill Hand
  Thailand), note CP effects are in process of
  being accepted into Western science, MagneGas
  seem to demonstrate HHO Gas(p126-132) like
  quality while being made from wastewater, also
  their lab data shows "over-unity energy release"
  effects. --gtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
11
Energy From Vast Biomass 32, SWC Depolymerization

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY WASTE ?3h Less Conventional
  Gasification/Liquefaction
• v-Sub-SuperCritical Water(SCW)/Thermal
  liquefaction-depolymerization(above either 374C
  or Pressure 221bar-22.1Mpa- 3250psi221times sea
  level, technically anything over 100C with
  ambient pressure or higher is for "sub", but
  usually lot closer to SCW level Highly potent
  and can gasify/liquify/decompose any organic
  matter at low cost ?(Biomass Technology Group BV,
  GreatPoint Energy, AltacaEnerji, Earth Wind
  Fire Technologies), Or can make biochar or value
  added 5-HMF (HydroxyMethylFurfural) ?(AVA-CO2),
  (?indicates Sub/SuperCritical Water related
  tech)
• SCW and cold plasma tech is fully science
  ratified, and has disruptive efficiency in many
  applications, Often use of catalysis(KOH, K2CO3,
  Ni etc). Need accurate temperature time control
  to maximize liquid fuel recovery instead of
  decomposition into water CO2 etc. Energy
  generation application is treated extremely low
  key has been long avoided at mainstream level.
  Only mainstream SCW for energy use is as turbine
  rotation medium.
• One high profile company rather mysteriously lost
  large , or entire industry suddenly drops whole
  business en mass with no clear explanation(Changin
  g World Technologies, Dozen mainstream companies
  in Japan in early yr2000)(For details see water
  tech report click here and search "ORGANO"),

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
12
New Perspective -Lowest Cost Energy From
Vast Biomass 33, SCW, Wet Air Oxidation

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY WASTE ?3h UnConventional
  Liquefaction
  v-Sub-SuperCritical W.
• SCW is re-surging quietly in mainstream Japan eg
  sewage water sludge superheated steam
  gasification(Meta Water, Chugoku Denryoku), Also
  used for AD pretreatment of solid or liquid
  waste(Gekkeikan). Oil industry can benefit by
  SCW cracking previously impractical tars, low
  grade bitumen - oil sand - extra heavy crude oil
  upgrading with possibly most effective EOR, or
  Refinery Residue Upgrading/cracking/visbreaking
  with little to no coke remaining(Inhibit
  asphaltene polymerization) ?(JOGMEC), Also
  drastically cut cost of Synthetic Crude Oil(SCO)
  production(no diluent use) to enable low cost
  pipeline transportation of oilsand (Syncrde)
  
  
  
• Wet Air Oxidation is used for WasteWater
  treatment regular municipal, industrial, oil
  industry caustic water etc. Slightly different
  from more "primitive" mechanics than
  SubCritical water process by use of bubbling
  reactor to inject oxygen/air with lower pressure
  than SubCritical water method, also generates
  slightly higher amount of emission than SCW(still
  minimum), ?(Veolia Water Athos, Bertrams ch,
  Wetox nz, Merichem - Kenox), Used as
  pretreatment ?(Granit Technologies SA), but note
  many SCW oxidation(SCWO) process also injects
  oxygen.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
13
New Perspective -Lowest Cost Energy From
Vast Biomass 34, Catalytic Depolymerization etc

• --gtgt cont 3 WASTE ?3h UnConventional
  Liquefaction v-Sub-SuperCW.
• Also lab success exists, of cellulose
  liquefaction with Phenol, Glycerol, Butane etc as
  SuperCritical medium.
• vi-Catalytic Depolymerization(or might rely
  partially on hydrothermal process)(Greenbase
  Sepadu, Green Power Inc, Alphakat, Nexxoil, BFCC
  - Biodiesel Technologies s.r.o, Mercurius
  Biofuels), seemingly low cost effective,
  possibly even simpler than SCW. Almost
  completely ignored by mainstream West.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
• vii-Super low cost Solar Thermal use
  Gasification (Al Weimer), viii-Molten metal
  gasification method Steam is also injected to
  work like supercritical water reaction as low
  cost disruptive tech(HydroMax Diversified
  Energy),
• pilot plant(Ze-Gen), Hydrogen production only
  with water organic material ?(Western
  Hydrogen), ix-Some unique type of Pyrolysis can
  be price competitive if byproduct is
  profitable(Pyrolyzer Spirajoule), 1MW scale
  system(???????? ??????????) From small
  residential furnace to commercial sizes Pyrolysis
  share in heat generation is higher in CIS nations
  than most of west
  
  

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
14
New Perspective -Lowest Cost Energy From
Vast Biomass 35, Landfill Gas

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY WASTE
  
  
  
• ?3i Landfill Gas(LFG) 50 of LFG is recoverable
  methane, generated by oxygenless anaerobic
  decomposition of buried organic waste. Although
  energy production is negligible as a whole macro
  scale(eg UK deemed 6TWh/yr level, 0.2 of entire
  power needs), if consider toxic gas removal
  process as cost, then LFG becomes significant
  "free" energy in local landfill area. Also at
  some locations it becomes lowest cost energy as
  is. Methane carbon footprint reduction has
  various incentives benefits.
• UK, US, Canada leads in energy recovery from
  Landfill Gas(Cambrian Energy, Viridor, DTE
  Biomass, CLP Envirogas, Infinis, Republic
  Services, LFG Technologies, Biffa, Progressive
  Waste, Ener-G). At those most advanced nations,
  it is deemed overall 15-50 of methane gas is
  recovered for power generation eg UK is does
  recovery at 80 of landfill sites as flared or
  power/heat production, with 50-70 of that is
  actually used for power generation combustion,
  Continental Europe Australia is active(Green
  Gas International BV, Landfill Gas Industries)
  --gtgt cont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
15
New Perspective -Lowest Cost Energy From
Vast Biomass 36, Landfill Gas 2

• --gtgt cont 3 MAINLY WASTE
  
  
  
  ?3i Landfill Gas(LFG)
• Fair portion of gas is let off as
  flaring(burning) even there is LFG management
  system in place(Hofstetter BV, GC Environmental,
  Comcor Environmental ), Some small old landfill
  sites can also recover energy (Deponigas ApS),
  Much higher utilization at large landfills,
  Power generation needs proper gas filtering of
  siloxane, H2S etc(Unison Solutions, Xebec, PpTek,
  SulfaCHAR, Prodeval ), recovery around 30-35
  range with large majority Reciprocating Engine
  special flexible power generator(Siloxa AG, GE
  Jenbacher - Clarke-Energy),
• 1MW capacity(can produce more than 1MW per hr)
  type system can use Gas Turbine, a few add CHP
  for higher recovery, or profitable Landfill gas
  to liquid fuel is a pilot level
  commercialization(Renovare Fuels, Velocys)
• Note Current waste disposal on land fill is
  close to none in Germany, Netherlands, Sweden
  etc, more 3-5 nations with 5 range those
  nations are not focused on LFG recovery as future
  energy source.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
16
Energy From Vast Biomass 37, Algae

• 4 OTHER BIOMASS ?4a Oil Bearing Algae
  Mainstream groups emphasizes price parity is far
  away, but some of pilot type commercialization/ful
  l commercialization product seems to be lowest
  cost in some selected cases while cost is coming
  down rapidly a-LOW COST ELEMENTS its high
  caloric content, order(s) of magnitude higher oil
  yield per growth area than many biofuel crops, or
  artificial indoor farming(Solazyme) with
  efficient-fast-economical easy
  harvestability-processing, outdoor system types
  utilize unproductive sun exposed warm land, might
  prefer human-undesired quality water(waste,
  toxic, sea/brackish)
  
  
• ß-PROCESSING EASE Most of utilized algae have no
  lignin very little cellulose content,
  processing is mainly to do with algae
  lysing(sometimes disruptively effective
  electroporation is used) which is far simpler
  lower cost than other biofuels even with
  conventional treatment methods. Extraction
  process after initial biocrude stage can be fit
  to conventional petroleum type processing system
  which reduces cost, also gives refineries control
  of pricing in case biocrude becomes much lower
  cost non distruptability during energy cost
  reduction steps eg Sapphire Energy vs Tesoro,
  Phillips 66, Algae.tec Algenol vs Reliance
  Industries, Cellana vs Neste, Solazyme
  Industrials with own refinery.
  
  
  
• ?-COST DERIVATIVES DEPEND ON VALUE ADDING FACTOR
  Becomes lowest cost fuel if processing is done at
  locations with high cost energy availability, or
  fuel portion within algae oil grade separation
  can be cost-adjusted with higher priced separated
  grades from the same run eg fuel grade vs higher
  value Omega3 etc --gtgt cont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
17
Energy From Vast Biomass 38, Algae
Energy-Wastewater

• 4 OTHER BIOMASS ?4a Oil Bearing Algae
  
  
  Some companies are making vaguely or clearly
  defined commercialized offering (Abca
  BioSolutions Pvt, UniVerve, Qeshm Microalgae
  Biorefinery BAYA fuel, TereGroup, Bio Fuel
  Systems SA), Notable recent cautional public
  remarks amongst producers since 2014 about
  commercialization, especially in US.
  
  
• Some works in conjunction with waste water
  cleaning CO2 sequestration as algae growth
  "fertilizer", when this cost is considered(carbon
  credit), it becomes lowest cost fuel in most
  places(also in some cases it would net some
  energy availability after water processing)(MBD
  Energy, Algae Enterprises, Ennesys), Possibly
  ignored in mainstream due to super low cost High
  Rate Algae Pond tech (NIWA - Solray Energy nz -
  Muradel Oil), Easy low cost fast process by
  recovering oil/pellet/briquettes for steady
  production(Algae-Industries.com), also enhanced
  algae growth by CO2 feeding in microbubble/nanobub
  ble(Perlemax)
• Additionally one can say cost is naturally low
  since they utilize well known lowest cost
  processing actions(amongst experts) but such
  processes(below 1 2) are still under-utilized
  in other fuel making or agriculture processes
  1-naturally all plant enhancing CO2 feeding, 2-
  Sub-Supercritical water type treatment(some use
  it in addition to or exclusively algae cell wall
  degrading oil extraction by enzymatic/chemical/ult
  rasonic/supercritical CO2 or alcohol/electroporati
  on-electric pulse etc methods).

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
18
New Perspective -Lowest Cost Energy From
Vast Biomass 39, Peat - largest biomass of all

• --gtgt cont 4 OTHER BIOMASS
  
  ?4b
  Peat Overall severely underharvested except
  claimed by mainstream to be locally overharvested
  Ireland Baltic sea region consumption against
  growth is negligible. As a renewal resource
  level, it is recoverable worldwide at very least
  120-150million tons/yr (2010-13ave world
  production 40million). Despite wester mainstream
  claims, even by carbon tests showing of annual
  peat growth of 0.7-2.8mm with "massive
  overproduction"at Baltics, Near city area North
  America Europe in last 70-150yrs, either peat
  growth is higher than mainstream figure or so is
  recoverable volume in these region, or both.
  
• Also at some large peat resource nations it is
  almost completely unused or not even officially
  listed(Congo, Brazil, Papua New Guinea),
  Bog-Wetland Extreme North conservation movement
  is helping to stop peat from entering into world
  fuel market(also they might successfully prevent
  land Gas Hydrate extraction) .
• But if Peat is considered non-renewable as ruling
  Western mainstream group claims(mainly American
  led group is overriding mainly European lobby
  like IPCC that calls peat green fuel) actual
  world Peat volume availability is similar to Coal
  reserve but much cleaner fuel, which would cause
  severe overflooding of energy supply to trigger
  disruptions in energy pricing infrastructure if
  fully exploited. --gtgt continue

19
Energy From Vast Biomass 40, Peat, various use

• --gtgt cont 4 OTHER BIOMASS ?4b Peat
  
  
  Hence seemingly for various political
  economical lobby reasons it is currently not
  harvested to even close to the capacity, or used
  for other purposes even if peat is usually lowest
  cost fuel available eg two by far the largest
  world resource holder Canada, Russia at 1/20
  level harvesting against growth
• Higher margin gained when sold as Growing Media
  for exports(LatviaLaflora lv, EstoniaSangla
  Peat AS, LithuaniaRekyva), Almost all
  production goes to Horticultural or other
  industrial related markets (CanadaLambert Peat
  Moss, Sun Gro Horticulture, Earth Care Products
  SPHAG SORB, GermanyKlasmann-Deilmann,
  UKNorthern Peat Moss Company), Often 2nd
  largest world Peat producer nation Sweden is
  mainly(but not mostly) for local energy
  use(Söderenergi, Svenska Cellulosa
  Aktiebolaget), also Finnish backed group
  involvement there(Neova bioenergi),
• Although revenue is lower than growth media use,
  fair portion produced for fuel(IrelandBord na
  Móna), Share with garden market use
  specifically as stove briquettes(UkraineVolyntorf
  , Belarus?????????????? ????? ???????,
  Russia??? "?????????"), Sometimes
  subsidized(higher margin to sell to garden
  substrate market) to secure large volume
  electricity generation(Russia, Finland6 of
  total power is peat, 35 world peat production
  shareVapo Oy, Turveruukki Oy - Oulun Energia,
  Kuopion energia, Vaskiluoto Voima, 50 in some
  regional power generation, can reduce SO2
  emission of coal when mixed), Some small
  production nations are using peat exclusively for
  fuel/electricity generation on local basis(less
  than million ton/yr)(Indonesia, RwandaHQpower
  Rwanda, Brundi)

20
Occasionally Lowest Cost Energy Clean
Under-Utilized Methane 1 Gas Hydrate

• Under-Utilized Methane
  
  
  Unconventional extraction method of
  regular Natural Gas Unclear differentiation from
  existing Natural Gas. Magnitude of supply volume
  seems to far exceed existing reserve of
  conventional hydrocarbon hence highlighted here
  as occasionally lower cost energy
• ?1 Methane Hydrate-Clathrate/Gas Hydrate
  Confirmed to be located mostly either offshore
  near continental shelf area ocean bottom, or
  Permafrost land underground in polar
  regions(Messoyakha gas field Gazprom Neft only
  publicly known full time large volume operation),
  or in high altitude permafrost region(Qiangtang
  Basin China). Also about 160times as dense
  natural gas storage with -20C(INPEX),
• Crystalized Methane combined with water in
  specific geometric form, as mantle derived
  methane surfacing into ocean/near surface is
  trapped in water under high pressure and low
  temperature. This ice like formation can remain
  so under pressure at substantially above 0C
  temperature(mainstream established idea).
  Recoverable accumulation is so far found to be
  100m to several kilometres thick. --gtgt continue

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
21
Lowest Cost Energy Clean Under-Utilized Methane
2 Clathrate location extraction

• Under-Utilized Methane ?1 Methane
  Hydrate-Clathrate/Gas Hydrate
• General mainstream consensus available volume at
  least exceeds entire conventional hydrocarbon
  resources(some "economically incorrect science"
  using nations such as China/Russia projects
  orders of magnitude higher). Highly disruptive
  information as this can undermine profitable
  "peak oil" appeal cause overflooding of energy
  market if extracted in mass. Although current
  test overall production cost is higher than
  Natural Gas from deep ocean, land base extraction
  can be already on par or lower due to
  shallowness, this will likely easily go lowest
  cost in high fuel cost regions as full operation
  occurs.
• Most of gas hydrate or a portion of ocean bottom
  hydrate can use conventional drilling
  extraction related methods, No need for
  economically environmentally expensive
  fracking, Shallower depth than many natural gas
  wells depth is 100m range in Arctic, 500m in
  other regions etc, land or water.
• But so far indication is drilling might need to
  be moved to nearby area quicker than regular gas
  wells if based on existing technology - if same
  tech is used higher cost? Studying the past
  track record shows, if exploiting this resource
  is important to mainstream group they would
  usually come up with "revolutionary" new
  technology in few years (eg fracking for Shale
  oil or deep well developing methods etc.).

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
22
Lowest Cost Energy Clean Under-Utilized Methane
3 Methane Hydrate extraction, CBM/CSG

• Under-Utilized Methane ?1 Methane
  Hydrate-Clathrate/Gas Hydrate
• Currently officially applied or tested main
  methods are Thermal injection(hot water/steam),
  Depressurization, CO2 replacement methods etc.
• Temporal wells Ignik Sikumi(US), Mallik(Canada),
  Atsumi Peninsula 400m off Coast (Japan),
  Permanent types(Mount Elbert)(US), all
  negligible production volume (0.01million m3/day
  range) Some of known participators
  ConocoPhillips, BP, Vnnigaz Gazprom ???????
  ???????, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of
  India, GNS Science, German gas hydrate
  initiative, ????????????? JMH, JAPEX ??????,
  ?????????, ???????, ???????? ??? Gas Hydrate RD
  Organization. Also smaller private operators
  participation Hydrate Resources Corporation
• ?2 Coalbed Methane(CBM)/Coal Seam Gas(CSG)
  Started as coal mine de-gasification program for
  safety in 1980s in US. Natural gas contained in
  highly porous coal molecule structure seams in
  relation to bacterial action/generation(speed of
  CH4 production seem to widely vary by
  conditions), also fair volume of Methane would be
  additionally produced by injecting CO2 into the
  coal bed which bacteria reduces (removing oxygen)
  to Methane for future yield(Golding-Rudolph-Esterl
  e) (see Abiotic oil p381-386)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
23
Lowest Cost Energy Clean Under-Utilized Methane
4 CBM/CSG - background

• --gtgt cont Under-Utilized Methane ?2 Coalbed
  Methane(CBM)/Coal Seam Gas(CSG)
• As of 2014 close to 2 volume of Natural gas
  production world wide with US is more than its
  80 share, helped by government back up.
  Mainstream western media's CBM availability idea
  is often about 1/20-100 of Natural gas volume
  reserve, but full scientific consensus projects
  rather on par volume with conventional Natural
  Gas Western media often quotes fringe segment of
  mainstream(somehow main media never calls them
  pseudoscience) that ignores massive oil other
  hydrocarbon availability world wide at publicly
  known less known sites in order to still
  advocate peak oil idea.
• Natural gas would be likely gradually shift to
  CBM in the future as main gas source. CBM
  promoters emphasize on it is able to stop methane
  escaping for carbon foot print reduction, or gas
  is actually overall even less emission(sweet gas)
  containing than conventionally extracted natural
  gas, while preventor groups focus on repeat of
  fracking water issue etc.
• Some new production areas would be lower cost
  than existing energy source despite extra water
  handling issue Much shallower depth etc.
  Different types of technology (eg altered type
  hydraulic fracturing is already used in
  Australia) might be needed to fully tap its
  potential. -gtgt cont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
24
Lowest Cost Energy Clean Under-Utilized Methane
5 CBM/CSG Operators, CMM

• --gtgt cont Under-Utilized Methane ?2 Coalbed
  Methane/Coal Seam Gas
• Main coal reserve nations have large potential
  i.e. US(ConocoPhillips, Consol Energy, Bill
  Barrett Corporation), Canada(Ember Resources, BP
  Canada), Australia(QGC Pty - Shell, Arrow
  Energy), Russia is likely to develop only small
  volume given current large production of Natural
  gas(??????? ??????? Gazprom Promgaz), Germany
  their definition of CBM CMM(Coal Mine Methane)
  is mixed as a large portion of it comes from
  closed coal mines(STEAG New Energies),
  India(Essar), China is likely to have most
  incentive to develop in mid term with strong
  state involvement(PetroChina, China United
  Coalbed Methane Corporation - ??????????? ),
  while some privates attempt to expand(Green
  Dragon Gas, AAG Energy)
• ?3 Coal Mine Methane(CMM) When coal is mined,
  methane is emitted vented as hazard, but not
  recovered when yield was inconsistent or mix of
  other air(20-60 CH4) etc, but now this "free
  energy" is starting to get recovered more - this
  also makes the gas lowest cost in some
  situations(Energy Developments, GreenGas
  International BV, Shanxi Jincheng Anthracite Coal
  Mining Group Co Ltd / ?????????????????). Often
  CMM doesn't include high consistently yield
  methane streams because it becomes its own well.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
25
Mainstream Pseudoscientific Free Energy claims

• Some were submitted to mainstream Western
  academic protocol peer review by Senior Western
  scientists
  
  
• 1-LENR-Cold fusion Low Energy Nuclear Reaction
  -1989, Heat generates as H2 (hydrogen) in water
  interacts with catalyst(Ni-nickel, Pd-palladium
  etc) at electrolysis when stimulus applied(heat,
  current, resonance)(Pons, Fleischmann),
  Unexplainable side effects of helium
  produced(partly similar to nuclear fusion) but
  very minute neutron/tritium/x-ray, and no gamma
  ray
  
  
  2-Cavitation Micro
  bubble fusion / Sonoluminescence /
  Acoustic-ultrasonic cavitation 2002, Extract
  energy from imploding light emitting bubble in
  liquid by acoustic wave excitation, Semi science
  legal mechanics(Taleyarkan et al)
• Both linked via solid state fusion phenomena
  elements
  
  Many repeated previous mainstream claims(LENR
  since 1925, Cavitation 1978, but above were
  observed by top mainstream scientists triggered
  first serious review, Mainstream thermonuculear
  fusion some systems cost hundreds of
  million/yr(also p177-179), ICF Inertial
  Confinement(US National Ignition Facility),
  MCF Magnetic Confinement(ITER- Tokamak, 30
  others) --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
26
Mainstream Pseudoscientific Free Energy claims
/ Academia's LENR-Cavitation. -vs- Inventor tech

• LENR Cavitation quickly proven false, No
  results fusion criticized, yet COPgt1
  Hydrodynamic Sonic Cavitation was already
  commercialized in Ex-soviet nations(p136) and
  scientists win national invention award(VN Kuchin
  - ?? ????? ????? ??? ???Kazakhstan)
• Similar physics law breaking mechanics
  anomalies both at LENR-Cavitation Inventor
  techs, but latter more openly admit
  
  
  
• Past main academics explain similar
  mechanics(Webb, Kelvin, TJJ See, Dirac, Kaluza,
  Faraday, Whittaker, W Crookes, Poynting,
  Loschmidt, Maxwell, Myshkin),
  
• Presence of Corporate Gov't project whistle
  blower inventor types including gravity field
  propulsion(Bushman, Car Rosin, Rob Wood, W
  Pawalek, J Black, McCandlish, D Morris).
• 12 LENR-Cavitation both seem to have similarity
  to Inventor tech. As of 2017, only a few of
  their scientists still ignore inventor type tech
  believing there is no validity in non academic
  peer reviewed data while bulk of them are
  suspecting or investigating its link.
  --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
27
LENR-Cavitation-vs- Free Energy Eniology Link 2

• --gtgtcont LENR(mainstream "free energy") vs
  Inventor free energy tech link
• But almost all of following pages inventor
  type techs were investigated in depth or
  developed a few commercialized(eg Potapov, RI
  Mustafayev) by Russian/ex-Soviet
  university/institute academic significant
  diversity academic freedom allowed unlike
  West(many worry about compromizing future
  promotion, not getting grant, or sometimes even
  losing job when openly discuss outside of set
  narrative in scientific "indisputable facts" or
  even geopolitical info).
• While data access from West was often restricted,
  and occasionally quite suppressive for new
  technology for political reasons(?? ??????,
  Kozyrevlikely due to early stage of psychotronic
  tech), science even in Soviet was lot less
  compartmentalized in a way freerer than West.
• Soviet openly affirmed ideas such as
  Eniology(?????????) /Bio-Energo-Informatics(??????
  ??????????????) biological nonlocal information
  exchange(VP Kaznacheev, Huping Hu) part of this
  is now commonly demonstrated by
  mentalists/Illusionists in mixture with
  conventional tricks in West. This includes idea
  of physically manifesting effects by mind(psychic
  /telekinesis), conventional Kinetic, or
  electronic means(torsion field) locally non
  locally both as fundamental physics base. gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
28
LENR-Cavitation-vs- Free Energy Eniology Link 3

• --gtgtcont Soviet - Russia CIS science
  
  Eniology as fundamental physics base was
  more or less official stance of USSR Academy of
  Science in 1980s(?? ??????????, ?? ????????, NN
  Bogolyubov, ?? ???????, AM Prokhorov), and
  currently still a strong Russia's minority
  mainstream group after western science-corporate
  connected group increased influence particularly
  after 1998(IMF/WB democratization's academic
  version). This idea was less developed in China
  but similar qigong or "paranormal" science was
  spearheaded by top politically connected
  academics(??? - Qian Xuesen)
• At least till around 1993 Russia had official
  large budgeted technology development and
  application for primarily military/intel by use
  of psychic technology as integral part of the
  operation(?? ???????, ?? ????????), and as
  reduced capacity till 2003-6(it is portrayed as
  pseudoscience waste of money by some groups in
  RussiaCommission for Combating
  Pseudoscience(p425-429)/ ???????? ?? ?????? ?
  ????????? ? ?????????????? ??????? ????????????,
  Still Claims Cold Fusion LENR as Fraud in
  corporation with west).
• But Soviets banned genetics, cybernetics(relation
  to above Bio-Energo-Informatics, also hypnosis in
  public in 70s), non-marxist philosophy/economics
  by reasoning bourgeois pseudoscience.
  Sociological data was also falsified/classified
  for counter intel purpose against West.

29
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 1, 2
Ambient Electricity Counter EMF

• Micro sized private/commercialized use, often
  multiple mechanics devised by single inventor
  most of following 1-11 category has 100
  inventors claims. Also science accepted
  sections tech with too high energy extraction
  to study versions such as aerial/ground
  electricity harvester or self oscillators/self
  accumulating capacitors are often claimed by same
  inventors.
  
  
• 1-Non-moving coil - Radiant energy/Ambient
  Electricity Inducer(Chernetski, Hendershot,
  Tesla, Baumann,Craig, Hyde,Thrapp,Adams,Gritskevit
  ch, Moray, J Murray, Hartmann, Flynn, SE Jones
  Kraut, DL Smith, Perez-Torres, PJ Kelly), Often
  transformer like setting of pair(s) of coils with
  Magnet/Ferromagnetic core or Bifilar coil in
  specific position against EM field(opposing,
  orthogonal), or Configured to trigger resonance,
  or geometry/pairing etc setup to amplify
  initially ignorable very weak oscillation to
  substantial level. Some are simple RLC circuit
  type, with separate source load batteries in
  circuit.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
30
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 1, 2
Ambient Electricity Back EMF 2 Academic Status

• --gtgt1-Non-moving coil - Ambient energy,
• Might involve high voltage no electricity
  (p197-217, Relation to Scalar wave, Radionics,
  Antigravity-Godin, Gene altering Lu Bürgin),
  
• Less disruptive micro electricity generation "out
  of nothing" has been discussed by academics
  particularly in non-Western nations. This claim
  is selectively ignored ridiculed by western
  scholar and science media(p21-23, p36) eg
  Generation of electricity from limitless thermal
  motion of ions across a two dimensional silicon
  surface at room temperature(Guoan Tai) - can
  make "solarless cell
• After repeated on-going demo mainstream
  debunking in 2016 Commercialization started
  Steorn Orbo, but this multi-yr operation company
  officially closed down after.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
31
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 1, 2
Ambient Electricity Back EMF 3 PFC function

• 2-Magnetic Motor- often Counter ElectroMotive
  Force in DC Motor (Back EMF/CEMF) Harnessed
  (TechnoKontrol TK Omega RF5000 Ant Romero),
  Others(Watson, Schappelle, Kawai, Reed, Heins,
  Ide, Parendev, Roshcin, Kenyon,Tracy, Tewari,
  Reed, Christie Brit, Steinmetz, Ward,
  Sumaruck), This is more disruptive version of
  mere CEMF Reduction(Chr Wanlas) tech.
  Antigravity effect might be involved(Cyr Davson
  Kar Schappeller), Used as a part of circuit as
  high performance all around Power Factor
  Correction device(works for current lag, waveform
  distortion, harmonic issues, works for AC
  power)(Roto Verter H Torrez), but actually many
  devices in this category functions as "battery
  power factor corrector" by "optimizing" battery
  performance
• Incidentally, Out of Apparent powertotal
  electricity power supplier owns to sell,
  Industrial use Reactive Power is often billed as
  penaltyloss to the power supplier but not
  consumed by industrial user , so this type of
  Power Factor Correction saving is mainstream
  approved but "Active Power only billed"lost
  reactive power is uncharged to residential user
  residential saving remains pseudoscience as this
  would imply overunity) --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
32
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 1, 2
Ambient Electricity Back EMF 4 Cold Electricity

• --gtgt2-Magnetic Motor- often Counter
  ElectroMotive Force
• Often spinning of magnet imbedded rotor(can be DC
  pulse timed - and this type closely resembles
  Torsion Field generator????? ???????
  p197-241), similar to monopole magnet(Fauble),whic
  h in itself rather simple to make(S Seike -
  ????) but still pseudoscienced, while gradually
  academic level report is allowed to
  publish(Tatara Takeuchi), Cold
  electricity(supercurrent) harvest by causing
  Townsend discharge/Electron avalanche breakdown
  in open air(Magratten),
• Can cause weather change(David Wells), EMF by
  electron spin at static magnetic field by
  time-varying magnetization in magnetic tunnel
  junction(zinc-blende-structured MnAs nanomagnet
  Pham Nam Hai )
• ? Common in 12 Often separate source power,
  charge, battery/capacitor used, a few need no
  external power. Bypassing regular self-cancel
  dipole power circuit in order to keep asymmetry
  electron flow, Energy output exceeds input when
  reach threshold level,
• ? Often claimed anomaly in 1 mix of Regular
  Cold electricity(Obolensky),
• ?Electron Vortex idea a-Ball lightning as its
  manifestation, b-Electrons can be in vortex form
  by default(Tewari), c-Tesla Coil as electron
  vortex generator,
  

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
33
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 1, 2
Ambient Electricity Back EMF 5 Zenneck Wave,
Single Wire

• --gtgt1-Non-moving coil - Ambient energy,
  2-Magnetic Motor
  
• ?Positive Reverse energy Bulb lights up in
  water, Whiter light, Rapid battery charge, Fix
  some dead batteries, Can be single wire(Zenneck
  wave relation?, also see p212,213) wireless
  connection, Voltage with 0 current(easy excuse to
  call it invalid/mistake since only resistance is
  measured but no current is measured potential
  only and no vector), Invisible force radiates.
  Finally commercialization of long distance
  wireless power transmission by conventionally
  undetectable Zenneck surface wave(non-Hertzian)
  use(Texzon Technologies)
• ?Device transforms/extracts ambient-thermal
  energy as electricity in endothermic form from
  environment Absorbs heat(instead of regular
  electricity's dissipating heat), Device can go
  below 0C, Scalar "wave" link(p197-217),
  Cone-toroid-pyramid shape circuit seems to
  help(at least pyramid cavity is known to absorb
  ambient Far InfraRed-Microwave oscillation very
  effectively and resonate inside), Often capacitor
  based high DC voltage pulse trigger, Spark gap,
  Intentional spike/ferroresonance (choking effect,
  also can happens when reg current is switched
  off) starts rapid inflow sort of like dielectric
  breakdown when intensity threshold is past.
  --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
34
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 1, 2
Ambient Electricity Back EMF 6 What is This
Extra Coming In?

• --gtgt1-Non-moving coil - Ambient energy,
  2-Magnetic Motor
  
• Seems to coincide with Electrical Resonance but
  more than just impedances cancel each other out
  something extra "comes in". Industrial size
  ambient electricity production seems to link to
  phenomena that is currently under-researched by
  regular electricity use mainstream power
  electronics resonance/harmonics/spike
  etc.(though these mainstream power factor
  correction is mainly about AC current, and power
  generation here is generally DC)
  
  
• ?Transverse wave(normal EM wave) vs Longitudinal
  wave(mainstream denied) negative
  entropy(negative resistor Ga Kron), Macro
  equivalent of 100 quantum efficiency by
  multiple-exciton/electron effect

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
35
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 3 HHO,
OxyHydrogen Gas Mileage Boosters

• 3-Overunity H2-HHO-Browns gas
  production(Klein, Zigorous, Lawton, F Wells, A
  Blue, Rhodes, Ste Ryan, Raju, Pantone, Pacheco, S
  Chambers, Kanarev, Y Brown, Gre Vezina, Eaton),
  Commercialization fully exists mainly as on-board
  Hydrogen/HHO generator for combustion enhancing
  to match maximum limit in Faraday's laws of
  electrolysis level mostly scaled down 10-25 gas
  saver(eg HHO HFS Pty, WaterToGas, Hydrotechnix,
  HodPros, CVHHO 200 companies), Water emulsion
  fuel combo(Cynergi Holding SA). North American
  mainstream market targeters are finally starting
  from Canada with 15-20 range saving while a few
  still stick to vague tech explanation(Blutip
  Power, Empire Hydrogen, dynaCERT, Innovative
  Hydrogen).
  
  
• Generally HHO devices produce slightly more
  overall saving than no maintenance needed often
  super low cost/low Capex-Opex Magnetic fuel
  treatment(Multimag pl, Fuelmax lv, MAGNETIZAGUA
  SYLOCIMOL ), Rare German TÜV passed 15 fuel
  saving(even if official narrative is
  pseudoscience)(Maratech ag TiziCALOR), Quietly
  selling to Fortune1000 type major corps' large
  scale industrial application(Maxsys Fuel System)
  with 5 saving. --gtgtcont with on board
  Hydrogen device comparable "add on" energy saving
  devices

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
36
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 3 HHO,
OxyHydrogen Gas 2 Booster Comparison

• --gtgtcont example of on-board HHO energy saving
  device competitors
• Same level low cost FarInfraRed(FIR) wave
  emitting nano ceramic in oil additive(Ceramic
  Power Liquid), or FIR solid state device placed
  in gas tank(Moletech biz), micro EM field/FIR
  wave of certain "form" by layers of different
  electrical potential minerals to augment
  combustion (Nanotech-beam SatoCompany), Vortex
  intake air flow based fuel saver with 5million
  units sold claims(Hiclone qld) above non HHO
  devices seem to be minor 5-15 range cost
  reduction at best, but some evidence of further
  saving when combined. More minor 3-5 level
  saving Plasma induced improved aerodynamics
  (Plasma Stream),.
• Yet even 10 saving fuel additive is still
  wholly pseudoscientized or ignored by "trusted"
  Western Mainstream media/NGO/Gov't for consumer
  market(many non-west Govn't approved) while
  increasingly used by industrial operations
  (Mazoil Maz Nitro), and previously listed "add
  on" devices in last 2pages are quietly installed
  for building/HVAC/lighting and industrial
  operational applications by some mainstream
  ESCO(Energy Service Company) and Energy
  Performance engineering companies that guarantee
  energy saving under Energy Performance Contract.
  --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
37
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 3 HHO,
OxyHydrogen Gas 3More Disruptive Booster

• Until quite recently, openly explained HHO
  effects at mainstream level used to get debunked
  companies went out of business in N. America
  (CHEC hydrogen), while they have been getting
  mainstream support in Europe(h2gogo,
  Creoproject). Now ELSEVIER accepts academic
  report that claims HHO gas is saving 50 gas at
  HCCL (Homogeneous charge compression ignition)
  engine - e.g."A new technology to overcome the
  limits of HCCI engine through fuel
  modification"(BW Bahng).
• Huge price gap with same quality Non-western
  major corp. involved(Norinco), Rare 30-60
  saving claims, some standing wave
  use(Shinko-Trans, Giriraj Electronics,
  Watergas.nu) last company also claims resonance
  use low cost Hydrocabon production(also see
  p381-386), Even 1 saving is impossible in
  Mainstream West cannot save fuel by making
  fuel from running engine, due to unbreakable
  universal law(p194-196), Saltwater Hydrodynamic
  cavitation based HHO gas production self
  sustaining engine combustion process(Ric Aho)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
38
Inventor Pseudo Science Free Energy 3 HHO,
OxyHydrogen Gas 4Some of Mechanics

• --gtgtcont onboard hydrogen generator
  
  
• Typical automobile HHO fuel cell" 12V powered
  6-7 flat stainless steel plates per stack, -
  unseparated electrolyzer, assisted by
  EFIE(electronic fuel injection enhancer),
  PWM(pulse width modulator), MAP(manifold absolute
  pressure sensor), Distilled water KOH
  electrolyte, Gas bubbler etc,
• So far water only run car(ie overt Faraday
  law violation) type services never continue
  operation some claim to have repeated visits or
  phone calls told not to(Boyce, Rasmussen, B
  Williams, S Meyer, Pantone). But there appears
  to be some exceptions recently one company's
  water generator claim matches with numerous
  historical characteristic expression of actual
  tech and might not be fraud(GDS technologies
  Canada), and finally core western mainstream
  linked group is quietly launchin