The Impact of Swallowing Function Pre and Post Head - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

The Impact of Swallowing Function Pre and Post Head

Description:

Outcomes for swallowing focussed on biomechanical function. Dysphagia associated with poorer QOL. Development of dysphagia specific questionnaires. Aim ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: headandnec
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Impact of Swallowing Function Pre and Post Head


1
The Impact of Swallowing Function Pre- and Post
Head Neck Cancer Treatment
  • Jo Patterson Research Associate / Macmillan SALT
  • University of Newcastle / Sunderland Royal
    Hospital
  • Mike Drinnan Principal Medical Physicist,
  • Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne

2
Outline
  • Background
  • Outcomes for swallowing focussed on biomechanical
    function
  • Dysphagia associated with poorer QOL
  • Development of dysphagia specific questionnaires
  • Aim
  • Describe swallowing difficulties in head and neck
    cancer from the patients perspective

3
Methods
  • Convenience sample (SALT) 2000-2004
  • SWAL-QOL _at_ pre- 6, 12 months
  • Exclusions
  • Tumour recurrence
  • Palliative patients

4
Measurement tool
  • SWAL-QOL 2002 (44 items, 11 domains)
  • general burden (fatigue)
  • food selection (sleep)
  • eating duration (communication)
  • eating desire
  • fear of eating
  • mental health
  • social function
  • symptom frequency

5
Data Sample
  • N65 (49 males 16 females)
  • Age 32-80y mean 60y median 62y
  • Oral (31) oropharyngeal (30) NPC (4)
  • T1-2 (35) T3-4 (30)
  • Surgery (10) surgery radiotherapy (36)
    chemoradiotherapy (13) radiotherapy (6)
  • 35 completed pre post SWAL-QOL
  • Analysed using ANOVA

6
Pre-treatment
7
Pre-treatment
  • Females had lower scores
  • T3-4 tumour group worse than T1-2
  • Oropharyngeal patients worse than oral
  • Nasopharyngeal patients reported few problems

8
6 months post treatment
9
Post-treatment
  • Males reporting more problems
  • T1-2 group reporting more symptoms at 6m, more
    mental health social issues at 12m
  • Orals problems with chewing
  • Oropharyngeals choking / sticking
  • Combined modality treatment worse than single
    modality

10
Discussion
  • Type of treatment
  • Tumour site
  • Tumour size
  • Time post treatment
  • Gender
  • Age
  • Nodal disease

11
Limitations
  • Biased sample
  • Reduced questionnaire
  • Small sample
  • Functional status
  • Some patients found questionnaire difficult

12
Conclusions
  • Assessment from different perspectives
  • Keep assumptions in check
  • Clinicians priorities vs patient priorities
  • Rehabilitate symptoms and perceptions

13
Acknowledgements
  • Head and neck cancer patients at Sunderland Royal
    Hospital
  • Research Development Capacity Grant Department
    of Health

14
12 months post treatment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com