Indications for Gastrostomy Feeding and Oesophageal Dilatation in Children with Severe EB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Indications for Gastrostomy Feeding and Oesophageal Dilatation in Children with Severe EB

Description:

Dysphagia. Aspiration. Constipation. Large volume of medication. Stress. Failure to thrive ... Dysphagia. Food getting stuck. Inability to swallow saliva ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:615
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: debrach7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Indications for Gastrostomy Feeding and Oesophageal Dilatation in Children with Severe EB


1
Indications for Gastrostomy Feeding and
Oesophageal Dilatation in Children with Severe EB
  • Jacqueline Denyer Senior EB CNS
  • (Paediatric)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
  • And DebRA UK

2
Gastrostomy
  • Preferred device button gastrostomy avoids
    introduction via friable oesophagus.
  • Methods of insertion
  • Open procedure via laparotomy
  • Laparoscopic
  • Endoscopic (Interventional Radiologist)

3
Button Gastrostomy
  • Low profile device.
  • Held in place by balloon reservoir of water for
    ease of change

4
Indications for Gastrostomy Feeding
  • Failure to thrive
  • Dysphagia
  • Aspiration
  • Constipation
  • Large volume of medication
  • Stress

5
Failure to thrive
  • Reduced oral intake microstomia, oral
    ulceration, dental overcrowding and decay.
  • Oesphageal stricture(s)
  • Increased nutrient requirement, competition
    between wound healing and growth
  • Reduced appetite from constipation

6
Alternative Route for Medications
  • Child unable/unwilling to swallow medicines

7
Anxiety
  • Parents aware of increased need for nutrients
  • Prolonged meal times
  • Intake greatly reduced at times of acute
    oesophageal obstruction, risk of dehydration

8
Number of Children with Gastrostomy by Type of
EB G.O.S.H. (1989 -2005)
  • Recessive dystrophic 58
  • Herlitz junctional 1
  • Non- Herlitz junctional 2
  • Recessive simplex - 1

9
Number of gastrostomies inserted
  • 1989 2001
  • Average 6.3 children per year
  • 2002 - 2005
  • Average 1 child per year
  • Introduction of oesophageal dilatation (2001)

10
Advantages of gastrostomy feeding
  • Greatly reduced anxieties re feeding
  • Healthier, happier child
  • Reduction in constipation
  • Alternative route for medications

11
Disadvantages of Gastrostomy Feeding
  • Leakage/soreness around site
  • Reduced oral intake
  • Increased G.O.R
  • Childs dislike of button change
  • Not always accepted by older children
  • Incontinence with over- night feeding
  • Fat deposited centrally, children remain thin
    limbed and of short stature

12
90 of parents said they would recommend
gastrostomy placement to another family
13
Oesophageal Dilatation
  • Indication
  • Acute obstruction
  • Dysphagia
  • Food getting stuck
  • Inability to swallow saliva
  • Odour from pooled food/saliva above stricture

14
Balloon Dilatation (G.O.S.H.)
  • Interventional Radiologist
  • general anaesthesia
  • - endotracheal intubation
  • - muscle relaxant
  • fluoroscopic guidance
  • - endoscopy
  • - water-soluble contrast oesophagogram
  • - pulsed fluoroscopy

15
Balloon dilatation of the oesophagus
  • Pathophysiology of strictures may be
    multifactorial
  • Location is typical
  • - cervical
  • - mid thoracic
  • Severity is variable

16
Balloon dilatation
  • 1.7-mm (5-Fr) BMC catheter
  • floppy-tip hydrophilic guidewire
  • 0.89-mm (0.035-in)

17
Standard techniqueM/11 y. Dystrophic
epidermolysis bullosa
catheter
guidewire
8 mm balloon
18
Patients and procedures 1999-2003
  • 31 patients
  • median age at first dilatation 7 years
  • range 22 months to 16 years
  • 118 procedures
  • range 1 to 9 per patient
  • 0/118 perforations
  • median follow-up 33 months

19
Interval between dilatationsPatients with 4 or
more procedures (n 13)
  • interval between last two procedures
  • range 15 days (patient 10) to 3.4 years
  • median 10 months
  • 11/13 (85) more than 7 months
  • interval since last procedure
  • median 7 months
  • patient 10 gt10 months

20
Parents audited comments about oesophageal
dilatation
  • Child feels better in himself, confidence is
    boosted
  • Takes away pain for the whole family
  • Mealtimes once again fun for the whole family
  • Change in eating pattern is unbelievable
  • its lovely to see her enjoying her food
  • Childs social life has improved greatly
  • Fewer foods get stuck in oesophagus and
  • cause distress
  • The risk of perforation is worrying

(Haynes 2005)
21
With thanks to.
  • Lesley Haynes, EB Dietitian, G.O.S.H.
  • and
  • Derek Roebuck Interventional Radiologist,
    G.O.S.H. UK
  • for their help in preparing this presentation and
    provision of some slides
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com