Economics 147 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Economics 147

Description:

Empirical research on effects of ... Ysqit = Ditaq qi ?qt esquit ... Ysqit = Ditaq qi ?qt esquit. Evans, Murray, and Schwab Table 3-6 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: norag7
Category:
Tags: dit | economics

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economics 147


1
Economics 147
  • Winter 2005
  • Lecture 12

2
Outline for today
  • Types of centralized school finance
  • Power equalization
  • Empirical research on effects of
    intergovernmental grants
  • Empirical research on effects of school finance
    equalizations (SFEs)

3
Power equalization (PE) aid,a.k.a. guaranteed
tax revenue (GTR) aid
  • Foundation aid guarantees a floor, not
    equalization
  • Extreme form of PE can actually equalize
  • State sets tax rate tG
  • District i sets tax rate ti tG
  • State guarantees tax base vs on first tG mills
    of ti
  • mill 1/1000th
  • Districts own tax base used for remaining ti -
    tG mills
  • Per pupil revenuei tGvs (ti -tG)vif(vs-vi)
  • f gt 0
  • f(0) 1

4
Challenges of redistribution across jurisdictions
  • Intergovernmental revenue doesnt fully stick
    to intended spending area
  • Knight, 2002, highways
  • Gordon, 2004, Title I
  • Local expenditures outside the targeted area may
    respond to grants/mandates
  • Cullen and Loeb, 2001, Michigan SFE
  • Unfunded mandates for the poor get funded at the
    expense of other programs for the poor
  • Baicker, 2001, Medicaid

5
Conditional block grants
Exp on pvt goods
Y total income in the town
YBG
Y
Exp on educ
Y
YBG
actual change in E
change in E without any crowding out
6
Does California generalize?
  • SFE under Serrano decision in CA decreased
    education spending
  • CAs SFE was extreme
  • What are effects of other state SFE plans?
  • Not all SFE plans are the same, so their effects
    are different too (Hoxby)

7
Effects on mean educ revenue and spending (Evans,
Murray and Schwab)
  • Mean state revenue (all rev and exp PP) rises
  • Local revenue responds to state revenue
  • Net effect mean total revenue rises
  • Mean spending PP at state level rises

8
Effects on distribution of revenue and spending
  • Court-ordered reforms reduce inequality within a
    state
  • by raising the bottom of the distribution
  • Little effect on the top
  • Evans, Murray, and Schwab specification
  • Ysqit Ditaq µqi ?qt esquit
  • Ysqit average per-pupil revenues from source s,
    income quartile q, in state i, year t
  • D dummy var for court-ordered SFE

9
Evans, Murray, and Schwab Table 3-5Ysqit
Ditaq µqi ?qt esquit
10
Evans, Murray, and Schwab Table 3-6
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com