Machine consciousness: future, fact or fiction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Machine consciousness: future, fact or fiction

Description:

'Consciousness refers to those states of sentience and awareness that typically ... Dennet, D.C. (1991) Consciousness explained. Boston (MA): Little Brown. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: staffB
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Machine consciousness: future, fact or fiction


1
Machine consciousness future, fact or fiction ?
  • Vanessa Herbert, Louise Redsull Anita Sanchez

2
Defining consciousness
  • Consciousness refers to those states of
    sentience and awareness that typically begin when
    we awake from a dreamless sleep and continue
    until we go to sleep again or fall into a coma or
    die or otherwise become unconscious. (Searle,
    1997)
  • Many states of consciousness
  • Consciousness is an inner, first person,
    qualitative phenomenon. It only exists when being
    experienced by a subject.
  • Primary consciousness and higher order
    consciousness (Edelman, 1988)

3
The study of consciousness
  • Q. How do the events which register in our
    experience relate to those occurring in the
    brain?
  • 2 methodological approaches 1st person
    (subjective) 3rd person (objective)
  • Identity theory consciousness is identical to
    corresponding neural events.
  • Functionalism Dennett (1991) states the essence
    of consciousness lies in the functions it serves.
  • Analogy computer software human
    consciousness.
  • BUT

4
Phenomenal Consciousness
  • Chalmers naturalistic property dualism
  • Consciousness (the mind) and neural events (the
    body) are correlated but also distinct. E.g. A
    computer could report and act on its surroundings
    and therefore be functioning but it does not
    necessarily mean it is conscious.
  • There is a missing ingredient of non-physical
    properties phenomenal consciousness a mystery?
  • Chalmers (1996)- Qualia- the qualitative and
    subjective dimension of experience. E.g.
    sensations, feelings, perceptions, even thoughts
    and desires as well.
  • Robots and computers do not have qualia but can
    have CRTM (Fodor, 1991). But syntax does not
    determine semantics (e.g. Searles Chinese room
    experiment)

5
Phenomenal consciousness cont.
  • Harnad (2003) Why are we not Zombies?
  • Dennett (1991) We are Zombies
  • Nagel (1979) asks us what it Is like to be a
    Dolphin? Humans could never know. Subjective
    experience cannot be reduced to neural events
    alone.
  • Nagel (1986) explanatory gap due to gap in our
    understanding

6
(No Transcript)
7
The science of consciousness
  • The sources of conscious thought cannot be
    revealed by thinking alone.
  • Hard problem of consciousness How do we turn
    the water of the physical brain into the wine of
    consciousness? (McGinn, 1991)
  • No scientific explanation or description can
    substitute for the real thing.
  • What are the fundamental properties that are
    shared by every conscious state? What kind of
    neural processes explain these properties?

8
Neural correlates of consciousness
  • NCC a specific system in the brain whose
    activity correlates directly with states of
    conscious experience. (Chalmers, 1998)
  • Content of consciousness
  • Binocular Rivalry in monkeys and humans coherence
    values (Finkel et al, 1989)
  • Conscious experience requires Integration
  • Conscious experience requires Complexity
  • Dynamic Core hypothesis (Edelman Tononi, 2000)
  • Qualia

9
Can we create consciousness in an artificial
brain?
  • The brain is unique in its organisation
  • Artificial brain- is it possible?
  • An artificial brain is possible in principle,
    although difficult to create (Dennett, 1994)
  • Complexity is not sufficient
  • We need to understand causation
  • An artificial brain might cause consciousness
    though it is made of some substance totally
    different from neurons, so long as it has the
    causal power to get us over the threshold for
    consciousness (Searle, 1997)
  • If the brain has physical features that cause
    consciousness (dynamic core for example), we need
    to understand how they cause consciousness

10
Free Will/Volitional Consciousness
  • McCarthy (2000)- humans computers have
  • External free will results we/it can achieve.
  • Internal free will knowledge of what we/it can
    achieve.
  • Similarly Dennett (1984) is a soft determinist-
    humans have free will even if actions are
    determined by internal decision processes at a
    neural or cybernetic level
  • But what about animals? Human beings are not
    alone in having desires and motives, or in making
    choicesNo animal other than man, however,
    appears to have the capacity for reflective
    self-evaluation (Frankfurt, 1971)
  • Maybe free will is an illusion, and we are
    nothing more than sophisticated meat machines-
    also a mystery!

11
Can a machine ever achieve consciousness? A
critique
  • A problem of definition
  • Defining Consciousness
  • Defining Machine
  • The actual question... Can a man-made artifact
    be conscious? (Harnad 2003).
  • (Blackmore 2003, Franklin 2003)

12
Can a Machine Ever achieve consciousness? A
critique cont.
  • A problem of recognition
  • No objective test or equivalent to the Turing
    test
  • The other minds problem (Descartes)
  • The misattribution problem (Torrance 2003)
  • The impact of our willingness to Anthropomorphise
    (Blackmore 2003, Sharples et al 1989).
  • Implications for machine consciousness (Harnad
    2003).

13
Moral and Ethical Implications
  • Torrance (2007) how should conscious machines be
    treated?
  • Should they be granted a sense of social and
    ethical presence free from racism and speciesism?
  • Implications for researchers.
  • The implications of importing machines into us
    (Blackmore, 2003)
  • But, do we really need or want conscious machines?

14
Conclusions
  • Machine consciousness valid topic for study
    (Holland, 2003)
  • Each theory of consciousness has different
    implications for the likelyhood of machine
    consciousness
  • Research is asking more questions than it answers
  • If machines are prescribed with as if
    consciousness then the question of whether they
    are really conscious will become irrelevant.

15
References
  • Blackmore, S. (2003). Consciousness in meme
    machines. In O. Holland (Ed), Machine
    Consciousness. Exeter, UK Imprint Academic.
  • Blackmore, S. (2003). Consciousness an
    introduction. London, Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Chalmers, D. (1996) The Conscious Mind. Oxford
    Oxford University Press.
  • Chalmers, D. (1998) Neural Correlates of
    Consciousness Empirical and Conceptual
    Questions. MIT Press URLhttp//consc.net/papers/
    ncc2.html
  • Dennett, D. (1984) Elbow room the varieties of
    free will worth wanting. MIT Press.
  • Dennet, D.C. (1991) Consciousness explained.
    Boston (MA) Little Brown.
  • Dennett, D.C. (1994) Consciousness in human minds
    and robots. URL http//ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/pape
    rs/concrobt.htm
  • Edelman G.M. Tononi, G. (2000) Consciousness
    How matter becomes imagination. London Penguin.
  • Finkel, L.H. Edelman, G.M. (1989) Integration
    of distributed cortical systems by re-entry.
    Journal of neuroscience, 9, 3188-3208.
  • Fodor, J. A., 1991, Replies. In B. Loewer
    andG.Rey (eds) Meaning in Mind Fodor and his
    Critics. Ox ford, UK Basil Blackwell, pp.
    255-318.

16
  • Frankfurt, H. G. (1971). Freedom Of The Will And
    The Concept Of A Person, from Journal of
    Philosophy, vol. lxvii, No. 1, pp.5-20. Reprinted
    in Watson 81-95.
  • Franklin, S. (2003). 'IDA a conscious artefact?'
    In O. Holland (ed), Machine Consciousness.
    Exeter, UK Imprint Academic.
  • Harnad, S. (2003). Can a machine be conscious?
    How? In O. Holland (ed), Machine Consciousness.
    Exeter, UK Imprint Academic.
  • Holland, O. (2003). Editorial introduction. In O.
    Holland (ed), Machine Consciousness. Exeter, UK
    Imprint Academic.
  • McCarthy, J. (2000) Free Will- Even for robots.
    URL http//www.formal.stanford.edu/jmc/freewill.p
    df
  • McGinn (1991) The Problem of consciousness
    essays toward a resolution. London Blackwell.
  • Nagel, T (1979) What is it like to be a bat? In
    Nagel, T. Mortal questions. Cambridge Cambridge
    University Press. P.165-80.
  • Nagel (1986) The view from nowhere. New York
    Oxford University Press.
  • Seale, J.R. (1980) Minds, brains and programs.
    Behavioural brain sciences. 3, 417-576.
  • Searle, J.R. (1992) The rediscovery of the mind.
    Cambridge (MA) MIT Press.
  • Searle, J.R. (1997) The mystery of consciousness.
    London Granta books.
  • Sharples, M., Hogg, D., Hutchison, C., Torrance,
    S. Young, D. (1989). Computers and thought a
    practical introduction to artificial
    intelligence. Cambridge MA MIT press.

17
  • Torrance, S. (2003). How should we treat them?
    remarks on the ethics of artificial consciousness
    research. Paper presented at The Turin workshop
    on machine consciousness. Retrieved from the web
    April 14, 2007. URL http//www.machineconsciousne
    ss.org/papers/How20Should20We20Treat20Them.pdf
  • Torrance, S. (2007). Consciousness as a target
    for the artificial sciences. Retrieved from the
    web April 14, 2007. http//lifeandmind.files.wordp
    ress.com/2007/03/life-and-mind-slides-march-2007.p
    pt.
  • Waldrop, M. M. (1987). Man-Made minds the
    promise of artificial intelligence. New York
    Walker Co.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com