Practical Problems in Pediatric Parenteral Drug Administration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Practical Problems in Pediatric Parenteral Drug Administration

Description:

into the thigh of infants or deltoid area of older children beneath skin and fat ... older children - the deltoid muscle or the posterolateral aspect of the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:725
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: hospi73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Practical Problems in Pediatric Parenteral Drug Administration


1
Practical Problems in Pediatric Parenteral Drug
Administration
  • Pediatric needs vary from adults due to
  • smaller dose volumes (smaller doses based on body
    wt. or body surface area)
  • reduced fluid requirements (as per organ function
    excretion rates)

2
Subcutaneous Injections
  • Use intermittent insulin, heparin,MMR vac.
  • continuous morphine, deferoxamine
  • 5\8 inch, lt 25 gauge needle
  • 1.5 mL max volume
  • into the thigh of infants or deltoid area of
    older children beneath skin and fat but above
    muscle

3
Intramuscular Injections
  • Use
  • medications that are irritating if given sc
  • faster absorption and larger volume than sc
  • if IV route not available for some meds
  • compliance if patient not taking oral meds
  • administration of vaccines (i.e..DPT polio)

4
Intramuscular Injections
  • 23 gauge, 1 inch needle
  • 3 mL maximum volume (5mL in adults)
  • 0.5 mL max. volume for deltoid area
  • infants - anterolateral thigh provides largest
    muscle mass or the rectus femoris (more painful)
    - avoid medial thigh due to major blood vessels
    and nerves

5
Intramuscular Injections
  • 2-3yr - the ventrogluteal area (not into buttock
    due to sciatic nerve) or deltoid area
  • older children - the deltoid muscle or the
    posterolateral aspect of the gluteal area
  • (not into buttock)

6
Injecting Subcutaneous Medication Via An Insuflon
  • Use
  • Many sc medications i.e. heparin, low molecular
    weight heparin, DDAVP, filgrastim (G-CSF), and
    interferon
  • Used in adults for insulin administration
  • Not appropriate for all drugs i.e. growth
    hormone as induration around insuflon will occur

7
(No Transcript)
8
Advantages of SC Administration via an Insuflon
  • Catheter dead space is very small 0.0075mL
  • Flush medication into patient with small amount
    of compatible solution if necessary
  • 7 days max. indwelling time(3 days for insulin in
    adults)
  • rotate insertion sites to avoid tissue damage
  • allows daily sc administration into canula
    without daily needle poke

9
Advantages of Intravenous Injections
  • Complete and rapid drug absorption with rapid
    onset of action
  • Immediate access to cardiovascular system
  • Useful in neonates with little muscle mass
  • Less painful route for frequent injections
  • Administer drugs which cannot be given by another
    route

10
Disadvantages of IV Route
  • Rapid drug/fluid delivery means immediate onset
    of adverse reactions and inability to withdraw
    infused solutions
  • Risk infusion of air, microorganisms, pyrogens
    and particulate matter
  • Risk sepsis (infection), phlebitis (venous
    irritation), extravasation/infiltration (leaking
    outside of the vein)

11
IV Access Sites
  • Peripheral Sites
  • -vein in hand or forearm
  • -scalp vein or foot vein in infant (possible
    but central IV site preferred in neonates)
  • Central IV Sites subclavian vein into superior
    vena cava
  • -central line inserted peripherally
  • -umbilical vein in neonates

12
www_geocities_com-lambda_med-medical_art_previews-
4_gif.htmCentral Venous IV Line
Central Venous IV Line

13
Factors Influencing IV Drug Delivery
  • small dose volume
  • slow infusion rate
  • dead space volume
  • drug specific gravity
  • infusion device used

14
Small Dose Volumes
  • many pharmaceutical manufacturers do not provide
    suitable concentrations of meds for pediatric
    administration
  • require prior dilution in order for dose to be
    measurable (ie. Dose volume lt 0.5 mL)
  • potential for dosing errors secondary to
    unsuitable drug formulations and dilution
    procedures

15
Drug Available Diluent
Final Conc. Conc.
  • .

16
Small Dose Volumes
  • accurate dose measurement (i.e. with appropriate
    syringe)
  • small syringe with integral hubless needle for
    volumes lt 0.5mL
  • provide 0.05 mL drug overfill in syringe to fill
    needle hub if needle must be attached
  • (include overfill information on label)

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
When Dose Volume is Less Than Fluid Volume in IV
Tubing
  • Provide medication device with 24hr drug volume
    extra volume equal to tubing loss
  • change tubing and prime with fresh supply of drug
    Q24h
  • after 24h - tubing is discarded for infection
    control and because the drug in the tubing has
    reached its expiry time
  • drug must be stable in selected diluent for 24h
    at room temperature

21
Slow IV Infusion Rates
  • cause an increase in the time required to deliver
    the dose
  • Slow/low flow rates (1-10ml\hr) commonly used
    with neonates and fluid restricted patients
  • potential for drug to disperse or layer out
    within macrobore IV tubing when IV flow rate is
    slow (use microbore tubing instead)
  • use of microbore (low volume) tubing (diameter
    0.06 - 0.14 cm) will minimize this effect

22
Residual Volume (Dead Space)
  • gt 0.05 mL of volume found in hub of needle,
    stopcocks, Y-type or T-type injection ports or
    in-line filters
  • overdosing by 0.05 mL may occur if syringe is
    milked
  • under dosing by 0.05 mL may occur if needle is
    changed after the exact dose is measured (dosing
    error 5 for a 1 mL dose volume)

23
Dead Space
24
Drug Specific Gravity
  • in slow moving fluid, the specific gravity can
    cause the drug to settle, float or pool in a bend
    of IV tubing and not be administered on schedule

25
IV Infusion Devices
  • large volume (e.g. Gemini) or small volume
    (e.g. CADD) infusion pumps
  • syringe pumps are accurate for small volume
    delivery
  • volumetric infusion devices (Buretrol) used for
    small total fluid requirements and slow rates of
    administration
  • choice of device also depends on frequency of
    dose (ie.intermittent vs continuous infusion),
    whether the drug or its vehicle requires special
    containers and administration sets,and the latex
    allergy status of the patient.

26
Health Risks Caused By DEHP
  • Affects developing reproductive tract (testes) of
    male fetus, male infants and potentially of
    pre-pubertal males
  • infants especially premature infants more
    susceptible to toxic effects
  • cardiac toxicity - may affect cardiac transplant
    patients of all ages
  • patients receiving multiple transfusions for
    trauma, hemodialysis patients also at risk

27
LEACHING OF PLASTICIZER (DEHP)
  • Medications which are lipophilic or are in
    vehicles containing lipophilic surfactants (e.g.
    soy oil emulsion, polysorbate 80) leach
    significant amounts of DEHP from PVC containers
    administration sets
  • Use glass bottles, polyolefin IV bags (P.A.B. IV
    bags-B Braun Mc Gaw), ethyl vinyl acetate
    (EVA) IV bags, polyethylene lined PVC
    administration sets, or polypropylene syringes.

28
Drug Incompatibility with Infusion Device
  • adsorption of drug onto plastic or glass infusion
    device
  • a significant portion of the dose may be lost to
    adsorption if very dilute solutions of the drug
    are infused
  • flush device and tubing first with drug infusion
    solution to saturate binding sites prior to
    starting infusion
  • choose low sorbing administration set tubing ,
    titrate the dose to clinical response

29
(No Transcript)
30
Volume Control Set (Buretrol)
  • Disadvantages
  • dose may have to flow through up to 20 mL of
    tubing
  • small volume doses given at slow infusion rates
    will have delayed delivery
  • Advantages
  • dilute drug to specific volume appropriate for
    the dose (maximum volume 150mL in the mixing
    chamber)
  • Y-in the dose close to patient and/or use
    microbore tubing

31
Minibags or Bottles
  • Advantages
  • convenient to dilute the dose in a prefilled IV
    bag
  • available in standard sizes 25 mL, 50 mL, 100 mL
    of D5W or Normal saline

32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Disadvantages of Minibags or Bottles
  • may contain more fluid than pt. can tolerate
  • fixed dilution may provide inappropriate final
    drug concentration
  • inaccurate dose delivery due to manufacturers
    overfill unless entire bag is given (25mL bag
    contains 27-33mL or a 24 volume difference)

35
Disadvantages of Minibags or Bottles
  • IV set used to administer the dose may retain up
    to 7mL of fluid (23 of dose in 25mL bag). This
    could be flushed into the patient using
    additional fluid or discarded with a set change
    or given at the start of the next dose after
    possible drug degradation.
  • if attached to primary infusion line, the extra
    fluid volume causes additional delay in drug
    reaching the patient

36
Syringes forManual IV Injection
  • Advantage
  • can inject very small volumes into tubing at
    injection site near pt.
  • administration rate controlled by primary IV
    solution flow rate.

37
Syringes Manual IV Injection Disadvantages
  • time for drug delivery depends on drug volume and
    flow rate of primary IV solution
  • amount of drug delivered depends on amount lost
    to dead space at the injection site
  • requires microbore tubing to decrease delays in
    delivery
  • more labour intensive requires flush

38
(No Transcript)
39
Syringe PumpsAdvantages
  • prepare drug in syringe at required dilution and
    give via microbore tubing at connection close to
    patient (reduced fluid volume)
  • dose given accurately at a rate independent of
    primary IV solution
  • used for both intermittent and continuous therapy

40
Syringe PumpsDisadvantages
  • only for small volumes lt 50mL
  • tubing will retain part of the dose
  • initial capital investment required

41
TDM Implications of Factors Influencing IV Drug
Delivery
  • Actual time for dose delivery may be longer than
    the predicted time due to increases in the
    distance between the drug injection site and the
    patient, the total volume to be infused, the
    specific gravity of the drug, or a slow IV flow
    rate.
  • Dose and dose timing errors may occur due to dead
    space volume errors.

42
Total Volume Infused and Injection Site
  • Volume Dose Fluid in tubing Flush
    (Y-site closest to patient smallest volume,
    Y-site above Buretrol largest volume)
  • Injection site to ensure 30 minute drug delivery
    in pediatric patients, inject IV manually or
    infuse IV using a syringe pump with microbore
    tubing at Y-site of IV set closest to patient

43
Time for Delivery of Chloramphenicol Using
Buretrol IV Set with TubingVolume 18 mL
  • .

44
Predicted time of chloramphenicol delivery with a
Buretrol set
  • Predicted time to delivery of drug dose
    (minutes)
  • Med. volume volume of set x 60min
  • IV Rate (mL\hour)
  • i.e.. 10 mL 18 mL x 60min 336 minutes
  • 5 mL/hr

45
Time for Drug Delivery Via Buretrol IV Set
  • Delivery of a drug added to a Buretrol is
    affected by slow IV flow rates and too small IV
    flush volumes.
  • Medication does not flow toward the patient like
    a plug, pushing the maintenance IV fluid into the
    patient without mixing.
  • Viscosity and specific gravity of medications and
    maintenance IV fluids vary so mixing will occur
    within the IV tubing

46
  • The amount of mixing depends on the diameter of
    the IV tubing and IV flow rate
  • When using a Buretrol set, increase IV flow rate
    and flush volume to compensate for the mixing
    occurring within the IV tubing
  • Use a flush volume equal to approximately 1.5 to
    2 times the volume of the IV set from the bottom
    of the Buretrol to the patient
  • Administer dose plus flushes over required dose
    administration time

47
  • QUESTION A 2 kg, 1 month old, neonate is
    receiving Digoxin 1.5mcg/kg/dose IV q12h. The
    physician wishes to increase the dose by 10.
  • Is the commercial preparation available in a
    suitable concentration to allow accurate
    measurement of a 10 change in the dose?
  • Which drug delivery devices may be used?
  • What are sources of error in dose delivery
    what effect may this have on the reported Digoxin
    level?

48
Solution
  • Digoxin dose and proposed dose change are
    appropriate
  • Digoxin is available as 50mcg/mL Inj
  • Cannot measure a 10 dose change with the
    commercially available product
  • Dilute Digoxin with NS to 10mcg/mL so 10 dose
    change is measurable
  • Device - 1cc syringe, manual IV injection into
    Y-site nearest to patient

49
  • Sources of error syringe dead space volume
    (0.05mL) and low IV flow rate (1-10ml\hr in
    neonate)
  • 3.3mcg dose 0.33 mL of 10 mcg/mL
  • 0.05mL x 10 mcg/mL 0.5mcg (dead space volume is
    15 of dose )
  • Digoxin level either 15 higher or lower than
    predicted if measuring inaccurate. Inappropriate
    timing of Digoxin levels and uninterpretable
    results if drug delivery delayed.

50
References
  • 1. Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing. New York
    McGraw-Hill 1986 Appendix 1.
  • 2. Leff RD, Roberts RJ.Principles and techniques
    of IV administration. In Practical aspects of
    intravenous drug administration.ASHP
    1992(2)4-41.
  • 3. Nahata M. Methods of intravenous drug
    infusion in pediatric patients. The Am J
    Intravenous Therapy Clin N 1984 May 6-7.

51
  • 4. Hunt, Max L. Training Manual for Intravenous
    Admixture Personnel Fifth Edition.Baxter
    Healthcare Corporation Precept Press, USA,
    1995.
  • 5. Roberts RJ. Intravenous administration of
    medication in pediatric patients problems and
    solutions. Ped Clin N Amer 1981 2823-34.
  • 6. The Hospital for Sick Children. Policies and
    Drug Information for Nurses Manual. Parenteral
    therapy - not intravenous. Toronto
    20004.01-4.03.

52
  • 7. Rice, Stephen P., A Review of Parenteral
    Admixtures Requiring Select Containers and
    Administration Sets, International Journal of
    Pharmaceutical Compounding, Vol 6, No 2,
    March\April 2002.
  • 8. Turco, Salvatore J. , Editor. The Sourcebook
    for IV Therapy IVAC Corporation, San Diego, Ca,
    1985.

53
  • 9. http//www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfil
    es/english/advcomm/eap/dehp/eap-dehp-final-report-
    2002-jan-11_e.html Health Canada Expert
    Advisory Panel On DEHP In Medical Devices, Final
    Report 220 January 11, Health Canada, 2002.
  • 10. http//www.fda.gov/cdrh/ost/dehp-pvc.pdf
    Safety Assessment of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
    (DEHP) Released from PVC Medical Devices Centre
    for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food
    and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, 2001.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com