Early results of a prospective trial of spliced vein vs PTFE graft with a distal vein cuff for limbt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Early results of a prospective trial of spliced vein vs PTFE graft with a distal vein cuff for limbt

Description:

distal or crural' (224) Limit: Human/Abstracts (41) English/ 1995. Paper Chosen. Compares Goretex with spliced vein grafting. Introduction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jayj
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Early results of a prospective trial of spliced vein vs PTFE graft with a distal vein cuff for limbt


1
Early results of a prospective trial of spliced
vein vs PTFE graft with a distal vein cuff for
limb-threatening ischaemia
16th June 2003 PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL JOURNAL
CLUB
2
The Question
  • Case Study
  • Limb-threatening ischaemia
  • Distal (below knee) arterial bypass needed
  • LSV unavailable for use
  • Options
  • Synthetic graft /- vein cuff /- distal AVF
  • Spliced vein graft
  • Composite graft
  • Distal graft origin
  • What is the best reconstruction option?

3
The Answers
  • Medline search
  • MESH Arterial Occlusive Diseases (18731)
  • Femoral Artery (17096)
  • and (2811)
  • Keywords bypass (791)
  • distal or crural (224)
  • Limit Human/Abstracts (41)
  • English/ gt1995
  • Paper Chosen
  • Compares Goretex with spliced vein grafting

4
Introduction
  • Single piece of autologous vein is best
  • Unavailable in 50 patients
  • Spliced vein bypass grafting
  • Constructed joining segments of vein
  • 2 year patency rates reported 23-73
  • Prosthetic conduit bypass grafting
  • Patency
  • 30-40 at 3 years
  • 60 at 3 years with distal AVF
  • 60-79 at 4 years with vein cuff Warfarin
  • Hypothesis
  • PTFE/Cuff/Warfarin as good as spliced vein

5
Patients Methods
  • Single centre, prospective, randomised trial
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Presence of limb threatening ischaemia
  • No one piece vein bypass graft option
  • Available vein segments for splicing
  • No composite sequential bypass option
  • Randomisation into 2 groups
  • PTFE Group
  • Spliced Vein Group

6
Patients Methods
  • Spliced vein group
  • Vein selection on basis of preop Duplex
  • Proximal anastomosis prior to further harvest
  • 2-3 end-end anastomoses 8/0 prolene
  • PTFE graft group
  • Venous boot constructed at distal end
  • All patients Warfarinised long term

7
The Venous Boot (Tyrell Wolfe 1991)
8
Monitoring
  • Intra/Perioperative
  • Physical examination Doppler
  • Completion angiography
  • Ward protocols
  • Medium/Long term
  • Physical examination Duplex scanning
  • At 1/3/6/9/12 months then 6-monthly

9
Results
  • Between 1996-2000
  • 39 bypass grafts in 36 patients recruited
  • 20 PTFE
  • 19 Spliced vein
  • Randomisation process
  • Equivalent
  • Age/sex/ABPI/DM/Smoking/Previous grafts
  • Non-equivalent
  • Significantly higher cardiac risk status in
    spliced vein group (Plt.0001)

10
39 Grafts
20 PTFE/Cuff Group
19 Spliced Vein Group
Inflow Artery Graft/Iliac 5 (25) CFA
15 (75)
Inflow Artery Graft/Iliac 2(10) CFA 10
(53) SFA 4 (21) PFA 3 (16)
Outflow Artery Pop 4 (20) AT 6 (30) Per 6
(30) PT 4 (20) DP 0 (0)
Outflow Artery Pop 4 (21) AT 1 (5) Per 8
(42) PT 3 (16) DP 3 (16)
11
Perioperative Statistics
  • Cardiac bleeding complications were more
    frequent severe in the spliced group

12
Long term Statistics
  • Note 1 patient in the PTFE/Cuff group lost to
    follow up
  • 4/10 PTFE/Cuff failures were associated with
    cessation of Warfarin therapy

13
Study Conclusions
  • Spliced vein reconstruction
  • Increased morbidity/mortality
  • Increased need for revision
  • Trend for superior patency rates
  • PTFE/Cuff reconstruction
  • Aggressive anticoagulation therapy needed
  • 4/10 PTFE failures because Warfarin ceased
  • Primary patency _at_ 2years with Warfarin 71
  • Less time, less blood loss shorter stay
  • ??Less risk in morbidity/mortality

14
Study Strengths
  • Prospective, randomised trial
  • Well defined entry criteria
  • Good patient follow up
  • Objective measurement of outcome
  • Applicable to clinical practice

15
Study Weaknesses
  • Small sample size
  • Unequal randomisation
  • Cardiac risks (higher in spliced group)
  • Increased morbidity/mortality
  • Most distal bypasses (DP) all in spliced group
  • All inframalleolar bypasses
  • Statistically,
  • Increased probability of a type II error
  • Low Power study

16
Study Weaknesses
  • No controls
  • Particularly relevant wrt to limb salvage
  • Unclear information
  • Process of randomisation
  • Monitoring of Warfarin therapy in PTFE group

17
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com