Title: Cosmic Ray Exposure Ages of Large Presolar SiC grains derived from 6Li excesses
1Cosmic Ray Exposure Ages of Large Presolar SiC
grains derived from 6Li excesses
Frank Gyngard, Sachiko Amari, Janaina Avila, Uli
Ott, and Ernst Zinner Laboratory for Space
Sciences Washington University St. Louis, MO
Australian National University,
Canberra Max-Planck Institut für Chemie, Mainz
The Origins of the Elements Heavier than Fe,
September 27, 2008
2Silicon carbide
Corundum
Almost all analyses of presolar SiC have been
made on grains 5µm or smaller. Average size of
SiC grains lt0.5µm
Graphite
31988-1990 at the University of Chicago two
detailed physical and chemical separations of
Murchison were made, resulting in samples of
presolar SiC grains
K-series
4L-series
The L-series fractions LS and LU contain
unusually large SiC grain
5Some of the grains
6Virag et al. (1993) analyzed 40 LSLU grains for
their C, N, Al-Mg, Si isotopic compositions,
trace element contents, and optical properties.
7Virag et al. (1993) noticed clustering of the
LSLU grains in their C and Si isotopic ratios.
8We decided to revisit the LSLU grains. Ill
concentrate on determination of cosmic-ray
exposure ages from 6Li excesses.
9- Tang and Anders (1988) and Lewis et al. (1994)
used 21Ne excesses in SiC to determine cosmic-ray
exposure ages. - These results were invalidated by realistic
determination of recoil losses (Ott and Begemann,
2000). - Ott et al. (2005) set limits on CR exposure ages
from cosmogenic 126Xe. - The large size of LSLU grains and their low Li
concentrations opens the possibility of using
cosmogenic Li for age determination.
10We measured B and Li isotopic compositions in
LSLU grains and found excesses in 10B and 6Li.
11The only reasonable explanation for 6Li is that
it is of cosmogenic origin.
126Li is completely destroyed in stellar
environments. Under special circumstances, 7Li
can be produced by the Cameron-Fowler (1971)
mechanism 3He(a,g)7Be(e,n)7Li. Any stellar Li
left in the grains must be mostly
7Li. 6Li/7Lisolar 0.08 6Li/7LiGCR 0.5 We
assumed a mixture of solar and GCR-produced Li, a
spallation production ratio of Li from C, and an
average flux of Galactic cosmic rays.
13We used the calculation for retention of 6Li by
Greiner et al. (1975) to obtain GCR exposure ages.
14The GCR exposure ages from 6Li are compared with
theoretical estimates of lifetimes of
insterstellar grains and of previous estimates
from noble gases.
1521Ne
New 21Ne results on LSLU are added (next talk).
16The LSLU grains analyzed have a limited range in
Si isotopic ratios.
17Clustering is more apparent if C isotopic ratios
are also considered. Can have grains with
similar isotopic ratios have different ages and
thus come from different stars?
13
18Ti isotopic ratios of LSLU grains (Ireland et
al., 1991) are similar to those of mainstream
grains from the K-series. Do LSLU grains show
any s-process signatures?
19Al contents and Al/Mg ratios in LSLU grains are
generally lower than in smaller grains. Only one
grain shows a clear signature of 26Al.
20There is no correlation, indicating no GCE
effects for 25Mg.
21Most LSLU grains have only upper limits for
26Al/27Al.
22Unlike smaller grains from the K-series, most
LSLU grains dont show s-process signatures in
their Ba isotopic ratios. (Janaina Avila)
23One LSLU grain has a definite 151Eu
excess. See poster by Avila et al.
24Several LSLU grains show s-process signatures in
their Gd isotopic compositions. See poster by
Avila et al.
25- CONCLUSIONS
- Large SiC grains from the Murchison LSLU
separate are unique in several ways. - From 6Li excesses we could derive Galactic cosmic
ray exposure ages for several grains. - Most LSLU grains seem to lack evidence for 26Al
and some lack s-process signatures. Did the
parent stars of these grains experience much TDU?