Commercial Frying Stability of LowLinolenate, HighOleate, and Typical Soybean Oils - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Commercial Frying Stability of LowLinolenate, HighOleate, and Typical Soybean Oils

Description:

Buttery: potatoes in butter, marg, or oil. Grassy: fries in parsley-infused oil sol'n ... slightly more grassy flavor, slightly less potato and buttery flavors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: pjwh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Commercial Frying Stability of LowLinolenate, HighOleate, and Typical Soybean Oils


1
Commercial Frying Stability of Low-Linolenate,
High-Oleate, and Typical Soybean Oils
  • Pamela J. White1, Caiping Su1 and
  • Monoj Gupta2
  • 1 Food Science and Human Nutrition Dept and
    Center for Crops Utilization Research, Iowa State
    University, Ames
  • 2 MG Edible Oils, Consulting, Plano, TX

2
Introduction
  • Common frying oils are stabilized by
    hydrogenating to reduce PUFA
  • Hydrogenation introduces trans fatty acids, which
    creates health concerns
  • Nutrition labeling of trans fatty acids in foods

3
Objectives
  • Evaluate new soybean oils with altered fatty acid
    composition for their stability during frying of
    commercially prepared French fries
  • Underlying objective Create trans-free soybean
    oils that are stable to commercial frying
    conditions

4
Materials
  • Soybeans grown in Iowa, Summer 2000
  • Beans crushed and hexane-extracted, Montana Power
    Group, Culverston, MT
  • RBD at POS plant, Saskatoon, Canada
  • 50 ppm citric acid TBHQ (100 ppm)

5
Soybean (SBO) Oil Treatments
  • Low linolenate (LL)
  • High oleate (HO)
  • LL and HO processed into pourable shortenings by
    blending with fully hydrogenated typical SBO (AC
    Humko, Champaign, IL)
  • Control
  • Typical hydrogenated SBO, designed for commercial
    frying

6
French Fries
  • Commercially prepared fries, Simplot, Caldwell,
    Idaho
  • Pretreated with
  • Highly hydrogenated SBO for control
  • LL shortening for frying in LL oil
  • HO shortening for frying in HO oil

7
Experimental Design
  • Phase I
  • Fries fried continuously (1kg/hr, 8 hr/day, 10
    days) in commercial 6.8-kg fryers
  • At days end
  • fries removed for sensory evaluation and testing
  • Oils sampled, cooled, filtered, returned to fryer
  • At days start
  • fryer replenished with fresh oil to fill line

8
Experimental Design, cont.
  • Phase II
  • Packaged French fries, sealed fresh oils
  • Stored at -20o C for 3 months
  • Entire 10-day frying operation and testing
    repeated

9
Methods for Oil Evaluation
  • Fatty acid methyl esters by GC (AOCS, Ce 1c-89)
  • PV of fresh oil (Stamm test by Hamm et al. JAOCS,
    1965)
  • Free fatty acids (modified AOCS by Rukunudin et
    al., JAOCS, 1998)
  • Polar compounds (AOCS, Cd 20-91)
  • Polymers by HPLC (AOCS, Cd 22-91)

10
Methods for French Fry Evaluation
  • Hexanal and total volatiles with SPME (Jelen et
    al., J Ag Food Chem, 2000)
  • Fatty acid methyl esters by GC (AOCS, Ce 1c-89)
    of oil extracted from fries
  • Oil content (AOCS Ba 3-38)
  • Moisture content (AOCS, Ba 2a-38)
  • Sensory evaluations, daily, fresh after frying

11
Method for Sensory Evaluation
  • 12-member, descriptive, trained panel
  • Intensity of individual flavors
  • 15-cm line scale, 0 no flavor, 15 intense
    flavor

12
Sensory Training for Flavors
  • Potato baked potatoes
  • Sweet potatoes soaked in sugar solutions
  • Buttery potatoes in butter, marg, or oil
  • Grassy fries in parsley-infused oil soln
  • Rancid and Painty fries in oxidized oil
  • Astringent potatoes soaked in alum
  • Burnt fries in overheated oil, then diluted

13
Fatty acid methyl esters () in Oils
14
Peroxide Values and Free Fatty Acids of Oils
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Oil Extr. from Fries during Frying
18
Moist. extr. from Fries during Frying
  • Uncooked fries set 1, avg 62.6
  • Uncooked fries set 2, avg 63.9
  • Fries after 16 hr, set 1, avg 39.7
  • Fries after 16 hr, set 2, avg 39.4
  • Fries after 80 hr, set 1, avg 39.6
  • Fries after 80 hr, set 2, avg 39.7

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Sensory Evaluations-Summary
  • Sets 1 and 2
  • Fries from HO had more intense rancid, painty and
    astringent flavors slightly more grassy flavor,
    slightly less potato and buttery flavors
  • Fries from Control and LL oils were similar to
    each other

22
Overall Summary, best to worst
  • FFA Sets 12, LLgtHOgtControl
  • Polar cmpds Set 1, HOgtControlgtLL
  • Set 2, ControlgtHOgtLL
  • polymers Sets 12, HOControlgtLL
  • Hexanal Sets 12, HOgtControlgtLL

23
Conclusions
  • Lack of oil breakdown in HO fries was reflected
    in a poorer flavor profile
  • More stable oils do not necessarily create better
    quality fried foods, but depends upon length of
    heating time
  • All oils in study had excellent initial quality
    and were not heavily abused during frying

24
Acknowledgments
  • MG Edible Oils Consulting Intl
  • Christina Blair
  • Jennifer Kuesar
  • Jose Gerde
  • Trust Beta
  • Amalia Tziotis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com