ShortTerm Memory Laboratory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

ShortTerm Memory Laboratory

Description:

There are severe limits on the number of unrelated verbal items that can be ... Poirier & Saint-Aubin (1996) Frequency & phonemic similarity. 6. LTM contribution ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: mar337
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ShortTerm Memory Laboratory


1
Short-Term Memory Laboratory
  • Objectives
  • Introduce basic theoretical empirical issues
  • Review predictions
  • Present methodological basics
  • Tools
  • Todays presentation
  • Next weeks planning session
  • References
  • Cognitive Psychology lectures

2
ISR and the Articulatory Loop Hypothesis.
  • There are severe limits on the number of
    unrelated verbal items that can be immediately
    recalled in their order of presentation.
  • Typical paradigm used to study STM Immediate
    Serial Recall or ISR
  • Research shows that in most conditions we can
    recall approximately 7 or 2 items or about
    2 seconds worth of material

3
Data Reliability
  • Multiple trials per condition
  • A trial one memory list to remember
  • Multiple participants
  • Standard conditions of testing standard
    instructions.

4
Verbal Working Memory LTM...
  • What is the relationship of verbal short-term
    memory to LTM ?
  • For example, it is well established that lexical
    or high-frequency items lead to superior
    performance in ISR...
  • Word frequency / word familiarity
  • Lexicality
  • Semantic category
  • Concreteness

5
Lexicality Frequency effects
  • Tehan Humphreys (1988)
  • Frequency, word class, suppression
  • Gregg, Freedman, Smith (1989)
  • Frequency suppression.
  • Poirier Saint-Aubin (1996)
  • Frequency phonemic similarity

6
LTM contribution ...
  • A two-stage account of ISR performance where
  • A list sets up a phonological representation in
    working memory that begins to degrade rapidly.
  • At recall, degraded representations are
    reconstructed or interpreted by calling upon
    long-term verbal knowledge
  • Highly familiar items are more accessible

7
A finer grained hypothesis...
  • This leads to the prediction that high
    familiarity, lexical, etc. items will lead to
    better item information recall
  • All else being equal, such items will have a
    higher probability of being recalled based on a
    degraded representation.
  • Predictions of the redintegration hypothesis when
    high low familiarity items are mixed are not
    supported.

8
Alternative Item Order hypothesis
  • In ISR, performance is a function of a trade-off
    between encoding item specific information and
    relational information.
  • Low frequency / familiarity items promote item
    information encoding at the expense of order
    information encoding.
  • ISR calls upon order encoding for good
    performance - Hence recall is better for highly
    familiar items.
  • Recognition better for low-frequency items
  • MIXED LISTS ISR
  • Order recall more equated
  • Differences should disappear or reverse

9
Tests of the item-order hypothesis
  • Paradigm 1
  • Frequency x list type
  • High-low freq
  • Pure lists vs. mixed lists.
  • Immediate serial recall
  • Paradigm 2
  • Frequency x list type
  • High-low freq
  • Pure lists vs mixed lists.
  • Missing item task

10
Design Materials P1
  • 4 conditions High in pure lists, Low in pure
    lists, High in mixed lists, Low in mixed lists.
  • 4 blocks of trials 1 high pure, 1 low pure, 2
    mixed.
  • 6 or 7 items per list

11
Design Materials
  • 10 to 18 lists per condition
  • lists have to be recalled (ISR) or one item
    recalled in missing item task
  • Controls
  • Word-length, concreteness, imageability, phonemic
    similarity, semantic category

12
Item Order scoring
  • pontoon lagoon racoon spoon platoon
    dragoon
  • pontoon lagoon spoon XX dragoon platoon
  • 1 1 0 0 0 0
  • 1 1 1 0 1 1
  • Lenient scoring 5, it follow that Item errors
    1
  • Strict scoring 2
  • Order errors (5-2) 3, but often proportions
    important

13
Research Methods - Lab 1
  • The devil is in the details

14
Definition
  • To clarify - a trial includes the presentation of
    a to-be-remembered list and the response to that
    list.
  • Each condition in your experiment should include
    many trials -- at least 8 to 10.

15
Steps to accomplish
  • Selection of the stimuli for inclusion in your
    study.
  • How many words do you need?
  • What characteristics should they have?
  • Word length to avoid floor ceiling effects
  • Difference in frequency introduced
  • Pre-testing a good idea
  • MRC database
  • Excel good tool also

16
Steps
  • Construction of the lists for each condition
  • Probably preferable to use the same words in the
    pure mixed conditions
  • Counterbalancing of conditions?
  • Preparation of instructions, practice trials, and
    experimental trials.

17
Stimulus presentation
  • Most years, stimuli are presented through
    PowerPoint
  • Timing capacities of the software can be called
    upon
  • Instructions response sheets needed

18
Data scoring
19
Data Input
20
Serial position analyses possible
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com