Title: Modern Trends in Dissemination and Validation of Atomic and Plasma Population Kinetics Data
1Modern Trends in Dissemination and Validation of
Atomic and Plasma Population Kinetics Data
- Yuri Ralchenko
- National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Gaithersburg, USA
Iron Project Meeting, Mons, Aug 2007
2Where to get atomic data
- Original journal papers (specialized atomic
bibliographic databases are of huge help here!) - Personal communications
- Online atomic databases
- Online atomic data-generating tools
3Largest Numerical Atomic Databases
- Atomic Structure
- NIST (evaluated)
- TIPTOPBase
- CAMDB
- Kurucz (Harvard)
- SPECTR-W3
- AMODS (KAERI)
- MCHF
- DREAM/DESIRE
- Atomic Collisions
- NIFS (some evaluated)
- IAEA (some evaluated and/or recommended)
- TIPTOPbase
- CAMDB
- AMODS (KAERI)
Yu.R., JQSRT 99, 499 (2006) also bibliographic
databases
4Theres more than just data
- New data-generating tools appeared recently
- IAEA
- Collisional cross sections
- Power losses
- LANL
- Structure and collisions
- AMODS/KAERI
- MCDF code
- Vanderbilt Univ.
- MCHF Java applet
- NIST
5NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ASD)
URL http//physics.nist.gov/asd
- Currently version 3.1.2 (March 2007)
- The most comprehensive database of evaluated data
on energy levels, spectral lines, and transition
probabilities
- 76,619 energy levels
- 141,075 spectral lines
- 60,285 lines with transition probabilities
- All energy levels and spectral lines are
experimental
6Grotrian Diagram example
7ASD Saha/LTE Plot
8FLYCHK time-dependent collisional-radiative code
URL http//nlte.nist.gov/FLY
- Developed by Hyun-Kyun Chung, Richard Lee and Mau
Chen (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) - Reference H.-K. Chung et al, High Energy Density
Physics, v.1, p.3 (2005) - Transient, non-Maxwellian plasmas opacity
effects external radiation field - Basic idea provide a flexible and robust tool
for experimentalists that allows fast and quite
reliable estimates of major plasma population
kinetics parameters including spectra generation
9FLYCHK http//nlte.nist.gov/FLY
10GENIE search over several databases
URL http//www-amdis.iaea.org/GENIE/
Output merged original output pages
Lesson 1 need standardized output from databases
11How much data are needed?..
- Simple line identifications kBytes
- Simple modeling of plasma spectra MBytes
- Advanced modeling GBytes
- NLTE-4 Workshop
- LANL 4.6 GBytes
- Stanford 2.6 GBytes
- LLNL 1.3 GBytes
- Submitted data are to be valid
Lesson 2 need to validate large volumes of data
12Old Standards for Data Exchange
- Mid-1980 ALADDIN (A Labeled Atomic Data
INterface) - What delivered
- ASCII files of a fixed format
- Included set of fit functions
- Set of FORTRAN-77 subroutines for reading and
processing the files - Major problems
- limited amount of data
- not flexible
- very restricted usage
- too old!
Lesson 3 old standards are not suitable for
modern technologies
13Why do we need standards for exchange of atomic
data?
- To allow different databases and applications to
speak the same language - To facilitate interaction between applications
and/or databases - To provide a reliable method to validate some
data features
14Tools for development of data exchange standards
- eXtensible Markup Language (XML)-based
technologies - XML facilitates the sharing of data across
different systems, particularly systems connected
to the internet - XML is an important medium for exchanging,
integrating, and storing data from diverse
sources - XML separates content from presentation
15XML example atomic energy level
- HTML ltbgtsomethinglt/bgt
- One can define new tags, e.g.
- ltenergy unitseVgt2.306lt/energygt
- lttotal_Jgt1.5lt/total_Jgt
- lttotal_Lgt1lt/total_Lgt
must be a real number
must be a non-negative integer or half-integer
must be a non-negative integer
16Approximate Data Exchange Approach
17Atomic and Molecular Data Markup Language (AMDML)
- To develop an XML schema allowing for a complete
description of atomic, molecular, and
particle-surface (solid) interactions and
properties, and other tools for data exchange
- Development approved by the IAEA Data Center
Network - Currently active NIST, IAEA, ORNL, Paris
Observatory - Presently finalizing the XML Schema
- Other related projects are under discussion
- Need more participants!
18AMDML condensed diagram
19AMDML diagram (contd)
20Atomic State Type
21(No Transcript)
22International Virtual Observatory Alliance
- IVOA 16 national VOs Mission to facilitate the
international coordination and collaboration
necessary for the development and deployment of
the tools, systems and organizational structures
necessary to enable the international utilization
of astronomical archives as an integrated and
interoperating virtual observatory - Develop various (XML-based) standards for data
querying and exchange (Simple Line Access
Protocol etc.)
23IVOA Data Model
- Main feature line oriented!
- Line Data Model
- Level
- Quantum state
- Quantum number
- Process
- Environment
- Spectral Line Access Protocol (SLAP)
- Main data carrier VOTable
http//physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/ASD/slap.pl?WAVELE
NGTH5.1E-6/5.6E-6
24IVOA VOSpec example
http//esavo.esac.esa.int/vospec/
25Atomic vs. Plasma Population Kinetics Data
- Atomic experiment can (in principle) be improved
- PK experiment can hardly be reproduced!..
- so that codes become exceedingly important
26Validation and verification of plasma kinetics
codes
- Increasingly important as the codes become more
complex - VV considered mandatory for establishing
credibility of calculated results - There is no hydrogen atom
- Need well-defined cases providing reasonable
level of participation and good chances for
success (not too simple, not too difficult but
simpler is better)
27Non-LTE Code Comparison Workshop Series NLTE-1
Au, 1020 cm-3
- NIST, 1996 17 codes, various models
- First shot (JQSRT 58, 737, 1997)
- Steady state C, Al, Ar, Ge, Au
- Time-dependent C (recombination)
- Te 5-2800 eV, Ne 1012-1024 cm-3
- Lessons
- Lack of agreement
- Importance of autoionization
- Role of high-n states in TD recombination
28Non-LTE Code Comparison Workshop Series NLTE-2
- Virtual Workshop, 2001 6 codes
- EMISSIVITY
- NLTE, steady state, optically thin
- Elements Ar, Ge, Ba, Lu, Au
- Significant differences (orders of magnitude)
- JQSRT 81, 71 (2001)
29Non-LTE Code Comparison Workshop Series NLTE-3
- NLTE-3, NIST, 2003 14 codes, 18 participants
- http//nlte.nist.gov/SAHA
30SAHA (NLTE-3) Database
31SAHA (NLTE-3) Database (contd)
32SAHA (NLTE-3) Database (contd)
33SAHA (NLTE-3) Database (contd)
34NLTE-4 Database
35NLTE-4 Database (contd)
36NLTE-4 Database (contd)
37NLTE-4 Database (contd)
38Closed shell (Ni) convergence
Below, near, and above closed shell
39NLTE-4 spectra Fe case
40NLTE-4 vs. NLTE-1
41Non-LTE Code Comparison Workshop Series NLTE-5
- November 5-9 2007, Santa Fe, New Mexico
- http//nlte.nist.gov/NLTE5/
- Steady state cases C, Ar, Kr, W, Au
- Time-dependent case C
42NLTE-5 Cases
Te
Ne
43Conclusions
- Pure databases are evolving into integrated
systems for storing and producing atomic data
(data on demand) - Development of new standards for AM data
exchange is important - Validation and verification of complex plasma
kinetics codes is becoming a necessary condition - International communication is absolutely
critical for success