Title: The Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling FRAM Field Project and Preliminary Results'
1The Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling (FRAM) Field
Project and Preliminary Results.
1Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research
Section, Science and Technology Branch,
Environment Canada Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4,
Canada
2FOG FORMATION OVER SNOW
MARINE ADVECTIVE FOG
VisVrhVliquidfogVicefogVdrizzleVrainVsnow
3FRAM-LUNENBURG
DMT FMD SPP-FM
Campbell Scientific HMP45C
VIDEO camera
Climatronic aerosol profiler (CAP)
Vaisala FD12P
EPPLEY radiometer
Young 81000 Sonic anemometer (YUSA)
MWR TP3000
Vaisala Ceilometer CT25K
4Ni and VIS
5MWR TP3000
Jan 4 2006
6VIDEO PROCESSING
7CAP 0.310
YUW 32Hz
8FT12P Vis
Marine fog (Lunenburg) 70 time during June
2006 Duration gt 1 hour Vislt 1 km
9FMD fog microphysics summary
10VIS VERSUS dBZ
11Visf(PR)
Visf(RHw)
12Vis parameterization for forecasting models
RUC Vis
13FOG DETECTION USING INTEGRATED DATA
FOG AREA WITHOUT GEM
FOG AREA WITH GEM
14CONCLUSIONS
- PARAMETRIZATION OF VISIBILITY IS STILL IN THE
QUESTION BECAUSE PARTICLES SIZES lt 2-3 MICRON
ARE IMPORTANT FOR EXTINCTION CALCULATIONS - PRESENT FORECASTING MODELS (e.g. RUC MODEL) USE
ONLY VIS-LWC RELATIOSHIPS THAT CAUSE LARGE
UNCERTAINTIES IN VIS. - PHYSICS, FORMATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND DISSIPATION
OF MARINE AND CONTINENTAL FOGS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY
DIFFERENT AND THAT NEEDS TO BE PAID MORE
ATTENTION. - PHYSICS OF FOG DROPLETS CAN HELP US BETTER
UNDERSTAND NUCLEATION OF DROPLETS WITHIN THE
CLOUD
?INTEGRATION OF OBSERVATIONS AND DATA FROM
MULTIPLE PLATFORMS ARE NEEDED TO BETTER FORECAST
FOG. ?OCCURRENCE OF FOG IN VARIOUS TIME AND
SPACE SCALES RESULTS LIKELY UNDERESTIMATE OF ITS
CLIMATOLOGY