Title: Early Childhood Development: Economic Development with a High Public Return
1Early Childhood DevelopmentEconomic Development
with a High Public Return
Art Rolnick and Rob Grunewald Federal
Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
2High/Scope Study of Perry Preschool
- 123 children from low-income families in
Ypsilanti, Mich. - Children randomly selected to attend Perry or
control group. - Daily classroom session and weekly home visit.
- Tracked participants and control group through
age 27. -
3Perry Preschool IQ Over Time
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
4Perry Educational Effects
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
5Perry Economic Effects at Age 27
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
6Perry Arrests per Person by Age 27
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
7Perry PreschoolCosts and Benefits Over 27 Years
8 Perry Preschool -- Return on Investment
- Total Benefit-Cost Ratio 8.74 to 1
- Estimated Total Annual Rate of Return 16
- Public Rate of Return 12
-
-
9Abecedarian, Educational Child Care
-
-
- Full-day, year-round program near Chapel
Hill, N.C. Children from low-income families
were randomly selected to attend Abecedarian or
control group. -
-
10Abecedarian Educational and Health Effects
Source Carolina Abecedarian Study
11Chicago Child-Parent Centers
-
- Half-day, large-scale program in Chicago
public schools. Comparison group was a random
sample of eligible nonparticipants. -
-
12Yale Study of State-Funded Preschools
-
- Analysis of evaluations conducted on 13
state funded preschool programs for low-income
children from 1977 to 1998.
13Georgia's Pre-K Program
-
- Since 1993, parents can enroll children in
4-year-old preschool. A study of the program was
conducted in 2001.
14Stanford and UC-Berkeley Study of Child Care
-
- Studied 450 children age 12 to 42 months
when their mothers entered welfare-to-work
programs in San Francisco, San Jose and Tampa.
15 Vital Ingredients of an ECD Program
- Fund at Perry School level to achieve high return
on investment. - Target at-risk children, but make available for
all children. - Allow for competition and specialization among
providers. - Test for program improvement and pay for
demonstrated results. -
-