New Financial Architecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

New Financial Architecture

Description:

The lender of last resort must be willing and able to lend freely. ... If it acted as lender of last resort it would probably have to have a regulatory ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: EMS57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Financial Architecture


1
New Financial Architecture
  • Proposals for Reform

2
Liquidity Crises
  • A solvent borrower with
  • Illiquid assets
  • Short-term liabilities
  • Two equilibria
  • Bank run
  • No bank run
  • Diamond and Dybvig (1983)
  • A bank run is a coordination failure Not just a
    lump-sum redistribution of financial claims

3
How do you deal with liquidity crises?
  • Bagehot (1873) In a crisis, the lender of last
    resort should lend freely, at a penalty rate, on
    good collateral.
  • There are three points here
  • The lender of last resort must be willing and
    able to lend freely.
  • It should lend at a penalty rate this is to
    mitigate moral hazard problems.
  • It should lend on good collateral. Meltzer
    (1988) This is collateral that is good if there
    were no panic. This is to distinguish solvent but
    illiquid institutions from insolvent
    institutions.
  • A good discussion of this Fischer (1999)

4
In a global financial system, liquidity crises
can become financial crises
  • Consider banks in a country with a fixed exchange
    rate. Suppose that they are fundamentally
    solvent
  • Short-term foreign-currency debt
  • High-quality long-term domestic currency loans
  • If there is no panic, the foreign debt is rolled
    over and serviced in full.
  • If there is a panic, the banks need foreign
    exchange
  • If the amount of foreign exchange that they need
    exceeds the central banks reserves there will be
    a currency crisis.
  • The central bank is forced to devalue the banks
    assets and liabilities are now mismatched it is
    unsound.
  • Foreign lenders write off their loans. The crisis
    may spread.

5
Example Mexico
  • After the December 1994 devaluation of the peso
    Mexico had
  • About 29 billion of dollar-denominated debts due
    in 1995
  • Reserves of about 6 billion.
  • Each holder of dollar-denominated debt realised
    that if other holders of the dollar debt refused
    to roll over their debts, then Mexico would
    default despite its long-run solvency.
  • Mexico was pushed to the brink of default

6
Two things that would improve matters
  • Most countries should abandon the use of fixed,
    but adjustable, exchange rate systems.
  • Bank regulation should discourage excessive
    currency mismatches. The IMF should publish data
    on currency mismatches and make reduction a
    condition for loans. Goldstein (2005).
    Governments, instead, have deliberately courted
    mismatches Mexican issuance of Tesobonos
    Thailand gave tax breaks for offshore foreign
    borrowing Russia attempted to attract foreign
    capital to the domestic bond market.

7
UK Proposal
  • Standing Committee for Global Financial
    Regulation
  • establish and implement international standards
    for financial supervision and regulation
  • Henry Kaufman suggests a similar International
    Regulator and Rating Agency

8
Is there a potential lender of last resort for
global financial markets?
  • In a domestic liquidity crisis, the central bank
    is typically the lender of last resort.
  • The main problem in managing global liquidity
    crises is the lack of an obvious global lender of
    last resort.
  • Fischer (1999) The lender of last resort plays
    two roles
  • It provides the funding.
  • It manages the crisis.
  • Potentially, these functions could be provided by
    two different institutions.

9
Could the IMF act as global lender of last resort?
  • This is suggested by Fischer (1999)
  • The 1997 Supplemental Reserve Facility allows the
    Fund to make short-term loans in large amounts at
    penalty rates to countries in crisis.
  • Lender role The IMF has access to resources, but
    are they large enough?
  • Manager role Countries with crises avoid
    approaching the IMF because they do not want to
    carry out IMF-mandated reforms.
  • The IMF can ask for collateral, but generally
    does not. Is it able and willing to distinguish
    between solvent but illiquid countries and
    insolvent countries?

10
United States proposal
  • A contingency finance mechanism within the IMF
  • Countries with good policy fundamentals would
    have access to short-term borrowing at high
    interests rates

11
Can the Private Sector Act as Lender of Last
Resort
  • JP Morgan led consortiums of private US banks
    that acted as lender of last resort to domestic
    banks before the creation of the Federal Reserve.
  • Collective action problems probably make this
    infeasible.

12
A Global Central Bank
  • If the global central bank were to act as lender
    of last resort, it would have to have access to
    funds equal to the liquidity gap the difference
    between short-term foreign currency liabilities
    and liquid foreign currency assets.
  • If it acted as lender of last resort it would
    probably have to have a regulatory role this may
    not be politically possible.

13
Bailouts vs. Bail-ins
  • Suppose there is a pure liquidity crisis.
  • If the lender of last resort could guarantee
    sufficient loans, there would be no reason for a
    crisis.
  • Alternatively, if it could force a comprehensive
    standstill on the part of creditors (a full
    bail-in), it could also stop the crisis. No
    creditor would want to withdraw its funds if all
    other creditors were unable to do so.
  • If it is known that the crisis is a pure
    liquidity crisis, borrowers and creditors are
    equally happy with either solution. In
    equilibrium, the outcomes are the same.

14
But, bail-ins can be difficult
  • If there is some chance that the crisis is a
    solvency crisis, rather than a liquidity crisis,
    creditors prefer bailouts to bail-ins.
  • If the bail-in is negotiated ex post, almost
    every creditor would like to get out rather than
    to agree to defer payment. It is difficult to get
    all creditors to be part of the stand still and
    those who are not are apt to flee.
  • If creditors think that a stand still is in the
    offing, they may flee.

15
Canadian proposal
  • Part of the proposal is that the IMF should have
    the power to invoke an Emergency Standstill
    Clause affecting all cross-border financial
    contracts.

16
Replace the Lender of Last Resort with a
Mechanism that Automatically Bails Everyone In
  • UDROP (Buiter and Sibert (1999))
  • Universal Debt Rollover Option with a Penalty
  • All foreign-currency loans must have a rollover
    option attached to them.

17
The Scheme Must be Universal
  • All foreign currency obligations (loans) must
    have the option attached.
  • This includes private and sovereign, long-term
    and short-term, marketable and non-marketable,
    negotiable and non-negotiable it includes
    overdrafts, credit lines and contingent claims.
  • All borrowers, both public and private, must be
    given the option.

18
Rollover Option
  • Each borrower, at his sole discretion, has the
    right to extend the loan for a specified period
    (say, three to six months).
  • The option is only available if all debt has been
    serviced in full up until the rollover is
    requested.
  • The rollover option can only be requested once
  • Allowing multiple rollovers at ever higher
    penalties allow the borrower to engage in Ponzi
    financing without the lender being able to invoke
    the formal sactions of default and bankruptcy
  • Liquidity crises tend to be short lived three to
    six months ought to be enough to stave them off.

19
The option carries a penalty rate
  • For the scheme to work, the interest rate charged
    must be high enough that market participants
    would not choose to exercise the rollover option
    under orderly market conditions.
  • It might be a large surcharge over the spread
    over LIBOR that the borrower would normally pay.
  • Who should determine the penalty? Not necessarily
    the market. Individual lenders do not take into
    account the social benefit of lowering the
    probability of a liquidity crisis. It may be
    necessary to mandate a maximum rate.

20
Could UDROP Make Things Worse if the Lender
Hedges?
  • When a financial institution grants a rollover
    option, it will cover its contingent exposure by
    shorting some of the borrowers assets the
    amount will depend on the perceived probability
    that the rollover is invoked.
  • If the option is invoked, the lender will want to
    hedge more fully, but given that the borrower is
    unlikely to be obtaining any other private funds
    it is unlikely that this implies a reduction in
    funds to the borrower.
  • Thus, UDROP will lower inflows in normal times
    and raise them in crises.
  • See Ortiz (2002) for a discussion of contingent
    credit and lender hedging.

21
Variants of UDROP
  • Instead of allowing individual borrowers to
    exercise the option at their discretion, allow
    the option to be exercised only when markets are
    disorderly.
  • Allow some specified institution (the IMF,
    national central bank or regulatory authority)
    or mechanical rule to specify when markets are
    disorderly.
  • The benefit is that it may reduce the moral
    hazard problem of insolvent, rather than merely
    illiquid, borrowers invoking the option.
  • The cost is that the institution given the
    authority to say when markets are disorderly may
    be subject to moral hazard problems, politically
    motivated or slow to act. It might increase the
    likelihood of corruption. Simple rules may be
    inadequate the conditions for complicated ones
    may be difficult to verify.

22
Should the Option be Strippable?
  • It might be efficient to allow the option to be
    stripped from the debt and traded.
  • Market participants could create a reinsurance
    market to spread the risk of UDROP being
    exercised.
  • However, borrowers should not be allowed to sell
    their option.
  • If the option is exercised, the current lender
    must roll over the debt this ensures funds are
    always available.

23
Could UDROP be Voluntary?
  • As borrowers do not take into account the affect
    of their actions on lowering the likelihood of a
    liquidity crisis, voluntary insurance schemes
    similar to UDROP are unlikely to be successful.
  • One such scheme is the Contingent Credit Line
    scheme. Borrowers pay a fee to foreign banks to
    have the right to draw upon a foreign-currency
    credit line. This has been tried by borrowers in
    Indonesia, Mexico and Argentina. Participation
    was limited and neither borrowers nor lenders
    enjoyed the experience.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com