The Great Deleveraging - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

The Great Deleveraging

Description:

An asset rated AAA requires only 1.6% capital on a bank's balance sheet. ... As soon as it became apparent that AAA assets were going to be downgraded in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Wac81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Great Deleveraging


1
The Great Deleveraging
  • how the subprime crisis became a run on the bank

2
In the Beginning there was Commercial Paper
  • 1869 Marcus Goldman starts the company that
    will become Goldman Sachs and invents Commercial
    Paper.
  • From 1869 to 1975 the commercial paper market
    grew slowly and as late at 1975 there was only 48
    billion outstanding.
  • It was primarily used by corporations to provide
    working capital.
  • Until the 1950s most CP holders were banks.
  • In the 1950s and 1960s industrial firms began
    to hold CP as an alternative to bank deposits.
  • In the 1970s money market funds were created by
    the 199os had become the dominant player in the
    CP market.
  • Because of the 1970 default by the Penn Central
    Transportation Company, the market insisted that
    almost all CP hold a short term rating by the
    rating agencies.
  • In order to obtain this rating commercial paper
    issuers had to obtain backup liquidity lines from
    banks.
  • Once money market funds, ratings, and liquidity
    lines had been institutionalized, commercial
    paper use grew rapidly
  • 1980 122BB, 1985 294BB, 1990 558BB and 2007
    1.3 trillion.
  • In 1983 the first Asset Backed Commercial Paper
    (ABCP) conduit was created.
  • This allowed firms to finance assets in a
    bankruptcy-remote entity.
  • SIVs (structured investment vehicles) are a
    variant on ABCP conduits
  • By 1999 there was over 500BB of ABCP outstanding

3
Then, Wall Street Created the Asset Backed
Security
  • Before 1970, investors could only trade whole
    loans
  • 1970 GNMA guaranteed the first mortgage pass
    through securities
  • They were quickly followed by FNMA and FRE
    (Freddie Mac)
  • 1983 The first collateralized mortgage
    obligations were issued (CMOs)
  • 1985 Sperry Lease Finance Corporation creates
    the first asset backed security (ABS)
  • It was backed by computer equipment leases
  • Since 1985 the banks and investment banks have
    rushed to securitize any asset they can find with
    a cash flow that is easy to describe
  • CMBS, student loans, home equity loans, credit
    card receivables
  • Aircraft
  • Commodities
  • Insurance products, e.g. catastrophe bonds
  • By 2003 there was over 6 trillion dollars of
    asset backed paper outstanding
  • There have been periodic blow-ups in this market,
    usually involving securitizations of
    securitizations
  • CMOs
  • CLO/CDO squared
  • CDO of ABS

4
Finally, Bank Regulatory Standards were Codified
  • Before Basel I banks were required to hold
    capital equal to a fixed percentage of assets
  • In the early 1980s the United States began to
    adopt more sophisticated bank capital rules
  • In 1989 it adopted the Basel I accord
  • Capital requirements are defined based on
    simplified risk-based rules
  • Different financial institutions were regulated
    (or not) by different bodies, the rules for
    banks, investment banks, insurance companies,
    mutual funds, hedge funds, etc are all different
    and are not necessarily consistent
  • The capital rules tried to segregate risk into
    different types
  • Credit Risk
  • Interest Rate Risk
  • Market Risk
  • Insurance Risk
  • Liquidity Risk

5
Wall Street Abhors a Vacuum
  • By the 1980s the tools were in place for an
    explosion in financial product development
  • The commercial paper market made it possible to
    separate financing from asset ownership
  • The securitization market, and its child the
    derivatives market, made it possible to
    transform risk at will. By passing cash flows
    through a series of legal entities or
    transferring risk via contract one could change
  • The legal form
  • The accounting
  • The tax treatment
  • The regulatory treatment
  • An influx of quantitative and legal talent,
    coupled with cheaper computers, made it possible
    to create and model increasingly complex
    transactions
  • With the ability to separate financing, legal
    ownership, and risk taking a number of companies
    sprang up to play specialized roles such as
  • Origination
  • Warehousing
  • Structuring and Sales
  • Risk Taking
  • Financing

6
The Players
  • Originators banks, savings and loans, and
    mortgage companies that made the original
    mortgage loans.
  • Loan officers at these firms were viewed as
    salesmen and not as risk takers
  • Compensation was commission based
  • Loans were sold on as quickly as possible
  • Warehouse providers loans were kept in
    warehouse facilities while enough volume was
    accumulated for a securitization. There were
    several types of warehouse
  • ABCP conduits
  • The balance sheets of banks
  • The balance sheets of mortgage companies
  • Usually financed via a total return swap with the
    bank that would ultimately create and distribute
    the bonds
  • Structurers banks and investment banks that
    created securities
  • Large financial institutions that created the
    legal vehicles to
  • Own the loan pools
  • Service the loans
  • Segregate the cash flows into the appropriate
    bonds
  • Once the bonds were created, the structures sold
    them on to various risk takers and finance
    providers

7
More Players
  • Equity Providers banks and hedge funds
  • These people took the risk of the lowest (equity)
    tranche of the securitization
  • It was viewed as an equity investment and they
    required equity-like returns
  • Essentially, the investment is a leveraged
    purchase of the underlying loans with
    non-recourse financing
  • Senior Risk Takers banks, insurance companies,
    mutual funds, and monoline insurance companies
  • These players are buying highly rated assets for
    cash flow.
  • Banks and insurance companies, they provide both
    the financing and the risk transfer
  • Monoline insurance companies provides only risk
    transfer and need a third party to finance the
    assets
  • Leverage providers banks, insurance companies,
    mutual funds and conduits
  • All of these parties provide the cash needed to
    finance the assets.
  • They assume that there is little or no risk to
    repayment of cash and that they are only
    providing liquidity
  • The rating agencies
  • In exchange for a fee, these companies opine on
    the relative credit worthiness of borrowers.
  • A borrower may be an institution or it may be a
    special purpose vehicle
  • A borrower may not even borrow money. It may
    just be somebody who has to pay money out under
    certain circumstances.
  • All of the bonds, as well as the CP conduits and
    monoline insurance companies all required ratings
    to play the game

8
Risk and Reward
  • Originators lend money to borrowers
  • Because they are selling the assets on very
    quickly, they have little or no incentive to make
    sure that the assets are of good quality.
  • As long as they follow the rules set by the
    warehouse provider and the rating agencies they
    know that the assets will quickly move off of
    their books
  • Warehouse providers earn carry off the assets
    while providing initial financing
  • Again, the primary risk management tool of these
    players is velocity.
  • As long as the assets are securitized quickly,
    there is no time for anything to go wrong
  • Structurers take only legal and compliance risk
  • They create the bonds and sell them
  • They earn structuring and underwriting fees
  • The primary risks that they take are either
    mis-selling or poor structuring which would
    result in them retaining risk that they thought
    was gone
  • Equity providers take the largest slice of the
    risk
  • In theory these players have the greatest
    incentive to do a full analysis of the terms
  • Senior Risk Providers and Leverage Providers rely
    on agency ratings to protect them
  • They generally do not have the capacity to
    analyze collateral in great detail
  • They use the rating agency analysis, sell side
    analysis and diversification as their primary
    tools for decision making
  • Rating agencies take a fee for an unbiased
    estimate of the credit risk in a transaction

9
The Game
  • Originators make loans to unqualified borrowers
  • Usually done by making no income verification or
    no appraisal loans
  • Warehouse providers are happy to accept no-doc
    loans as they know that these loans are allowable
    collateral for securitizations
  • Structurers rely on their knowledge of rating
    agency and regulatory capital rules to create
    securitizations. For example
  • An asset rated AAA requires only 1.6 capital on
    a banks balance sheet. While an asset rated
    below BBB requires 8 capital.
  • If you can get a rating agency to rate a bond AAA
    with less than 8 subordination then when you
    create the securitization you have freed up
    capital.
  • In the simplest case (which is not allowed), a
    bank could hold the equity and the senior piece
    of a securitization and hold less capital than it
    did if it just held the loans.
  • The extra income produced by the freed capital
    can be spread around to multiple players
  • As long as defaults dont pass the equity layer
    of the structures everybody makes a higher return
    on capital.

10
The Problem
  • Over time, money rushed into the sector to earn
    the excess returns.
  • As returns dropped investors required more and
    more leverage to make enough money
  • In order to get this leverage the ABS CDO was
    created
  • This took low rated tranches of ABS
    securitizations, threw them into a trust and
    re-securitzed them.
  • This created new equity and new AAA debt
  • This whole process relied on two key assumptions
  • The loan originators were making loans that were
    just as creditworthy as past loans had been
  • The system took away all incentive for this.
  • They got paid if the loans were good or bad
  • Acceptance of no-doc loans meant that they didnt
    even need to ask the questions.
  • The rating agencies were correct about the
    ratings of the bonds and of the various parties
  • In order to rate the bonds they needed to get the
    default rates right within the original
    collateral class
  • They were wrong, but losses stayed within
    stressed parameters
  • In order to rate the CDOs they needed to get the
    correlations right among the various bonds in the
    trust
  • They got this horribly wrong and massively
    underestimated the correlation

11
What Went Wrong?
  • The rating agencies were providing the tools to
    use less and less capital to support asset
    purchases
  • Each time the assets were re-securitized, this
    leverage went up.
  • In the end there were two highly leveraged
    classes of player that had massive exposure to
    any rating errors, the CP conduits and the
    monoline insurers
  • When defaults occurred in excess of prior
    experience, market players recognized this and
    began to mark down BBB rated ABS securities.
  • Because the BBB rated ABS securities were the
    collateral for ABS CDOs this mark-down led to
    losses in the junior tranches of the CDOs.
  • The correlations turned out to be much higher
    than those used in the ratings and the losses
    spread to AAA tranches
  • As soon as it became apparent that AAA assets
    were going to be downgraded in large numbers, we
    had the makings of a liquidity crisis

12
Out of Liquidity
  • When it is likely that enough assets owned by
    monoline insurance companies will default, it
    causes their ratings to come into question and
    they get downgraded
  • Once an asset is downgraded below a minimum
    threshold, CP conduits have to liquidate that
    asset.
  • CP conduits were hit by a double whammy
  • They had to liquidate assets that were
    experiencing losses
  • They had to liquidate assets wrapped by monoline
    companies
  • Over 500BB dollars worth of assets had to be
    liquidated or taken back onto bank balance sheets
  • Because taking an asset back onto a balance sheet
    requires more regulatory capital than financing
    it, the banks had to liquidate other assets to
    make sure that they had enough capital
  • Because many assets were being liquidated at
    once, this had to be done at fire-sale prices
  • Because banks have to mark newly consolidated
    assets to market they had to take even bigger
    losses into earnings
  • The market for these securities ground to a halt
  • In order to restore their capital position, banks
    had to stop making loans or sell assets, often at
    a loss
  • Because nobody knew who owned which pieces of
    risk, trust broke down leading to general
    unwillingness to lend even when capital was
    available.

13
The Great Deleveraging
  • Every time an asset is moved onto a balance sheet
    or marked down it removes capital from the
    system.
  • In order to shore up capital, banks have been
    selling assets or taking back credit previously
    provided
  • Asset holders who can no longer obtain financing
    must sell those assets
  • There may be nothing wrong with the asset holder
  • There may be nothing wrong with the asset
  • There is simply no liquidity
  • Every time one person sells at a fire sale price,
    everyone else has to mark down their position and
    the cycle starts again
  • Eventually it stops because you get enough
    irrational pricing or because people go bankrupt
  • We have what appears to be irrational pricing now
    but we still have a lack of trust
  • This is why the Federal Reserve engineered the
    Bear Stearns takeover and allowed investment
    banks to borrow. They need to restore trust
  • Deleveraging has real world consequences
  • Our economy is built on credit. If people and
    businesses cant get credit, they dont invest
  • An asset bubble can create a realworld slow down.

14
What Can We Do?
  • We need to take our medicine quickly.
  • The economy cant rebuild until people are done
    taking their losses
  • This is the lesson of the Japanese bubble economy
  • We may need more government intervention
  • Left alone, each market participant, may, while
    acting in their own self interest, act in such a
    way as to exacerbate the problem.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com