Lecture 16 Physical Design and Layout of Passive Analog Components - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 16 Physical Design and Layout of Passive Analog Components

Description:

Lecture 16 Physical Design and Layout of Passive Analog Components – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:388
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: pagr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 16 Physical Design and Layout of Passive Analog Components


1
Lecture 16Physical Design and Layout of Passive
Analog Components
  • Resistor physical design
  • Capacitor physical design
  • Inductor physical design
  • Summary
  • Michael L. Bushnell
  • CAIP Center and WINLAB
  • ECE Dept., Rutgers U., Piscataway, NJ

2
Resistors
  • Undoped polysilicon is highly resistive
  • Avoid doping the poly if you are making an R
  • Can get tera W (1012 W ) resistors
  • Mixed-Signal applications
  • Use nichrome metal (NiCr) to make Rs
  • Laser trimming evaporates parts of the resistor
    while measuring R until it comes within
    specifications
  • R in KW / range
  • Excellent temperature stability long-term
    reliability
  • Note that all Rs in circuit contribute thermal
    noise

3
Resistor Fabrication and Physical Design
  • Black lines show path of laser trimming beam

4
Resistor Fabrication Methods
  • Doped polysilicon most useful R 20 to 30
    W /
  • Silicon process problem R tolerances matching
  • Clad-poly process Silicide block mask needed to
    get sufficient R
  • Can withstand 100 V between R and substrate
  • Can operate beyond VSS to VDD range

5
Resistor Thermal Problems
  • Field oxide isolates R thermally
  • If R dissipates moderate to large power, get
    permanent R changes due to self-induced annealing
  • Poly can melt or crack due to heat, but very good
    for making fuses
  • Polysilicon R undesirable for Electro-Static
    Discharge protection

6
n Substrate Diffusion Resistor
  • Strip of n diffusion R 30 to 50 W /
  • Avalanche breakdown limits voltage to 10 to 15 V

7
p Substrate Diffusion Resistor
  • Must bias well above the resistor voltage to
    maintain isolation
  • Connect well to more positive R end or to VDD
  • Have limited R and low breakdown voltage
  • Strip of n-well contacts at either end of R
  • Put n substrate diffusion under contacts
    prevents formation of rectifying Schottky barrier

8
p Substrate Resistor Problems
  • Notoriously variable resistors
  • Slight doping differences
  • Out-diffusion
  • Voltage modulation of depletion regions
  • Surface effects

9
Capacitor Issues
  • Want most C for least area
  • Fringing C now is very significant use to get
    more C
  • Best capacitive coefficient Cgs (gate to
    substrate MOS C)
  • 2nd Best Cjap (p diffusion area)
  • 3rd Best Cjp (n p diffusion periphery)
  • 4th Best Cjan (n diffusion area)
  • 5th Best Cm1p (metal 1 to poly C) Cm1d (metal
    1 to diffusion)
  • 6th Best Cp (poly over field oxide) and Cm2m1
    (metal2 metal1)

10
More Capacitor Issues
  • 7th Best
  • Cm1 (metal 1 over field oxide)
  • Cm2p (metal 2 to poly)
  • Cm2d (metal 2 to diffusion)
  • Cm3m2 (metal 3 to Metal 2)
  • Problems with Cs coupled to substrate one
    terminal is constrained
  • Do not use except when it suits the circuit
  • Use fringing C now is more significant than
    substrate capacitance

11
Multi-Dimensional Capacitance
  • Used to get more C/unit area of chip surface than
    would be otherwise possible

12
Polysilicon Capacitor
  • ONO oxide-nitride-oxide dielectric

13
Trench Polysilicon Capacitors
  • Trench C Used for 64 Mbit DRAM 90 fF

14
Fin Capacitor
  • Fin C Also used for 64 Mbit DRAM 20 to 30 fF

15
Capacitance Calculation
  • Cja junction C / mm2 Cjp periphery C
    / mm
  • a diffusion width b diffusion
    length
  • Sidewall C facing channel reduced by channel
    depletion region absence of field implant
  • As we scale, peripheral C becomes more important
  • Cja Cjp are f (junction voltage)
  • Cj Cj0 (1 - ) m Cj0
    zero-bias C
  • Vj junction voltage Vb built-in potential
    (0.6 V)
  • 0.3 (graded junction) m 0.5
    (abrupt junction)

Vj Vb

16
Scaling Effects on Capacitance
  • Increasing fringing fields increase C add Cgs0,
    Cgd0, Cgb0 to Cgs, Cgd, Cgb for SPICE
  • Caused by poly extension beyond channel other
    overlaps
  • Transistor gate C about 4 to 5 X diffusion C
    dominates CL

17
Fringing Capacitance
  • Fringing field C
  • Approximate routing capacitance between metal
    poly wires and substrate as a parallel plate C

18
Fringing Field Capacitance
  • Fringing fields increase
    effective plate area
  • Use C A / h
  • In order to handle fringing, use
  • w conductor width h insulator
    thickness
  • t conductor thickness insulator
    permittivity

19
Multiple Conductor Capacitance
  • With 3 to 5 routing layers, accurate C
    computation takes too long. Use formulae instead
  • Model of Metal 1 3 layers

20
Detailed Multiple Conductor Model
  • 3 Potential layers
  • Top ground plane
  • Interesting conductor
  • Bottom ground plane

21
Multi-Layer Capacitances
22
Middle Layer Capacitance
  • Interesting conductor C has 3 components
  • Line-to-ground C
  • Line-to-line C
  • Crossover C
  • Capacitance of middle layer to ground
  • C2 C21 C23 C22
  • C21 C23 crossover C formula (for wires on top
    of each other)
  • C22 is line-to-line C weighted sum

23
Middle Layer Capacitance (contd)
  • C22 AC (line-to-line, 2 ground) BC
    (line-to-line, isolated)
  • A B 1
  • A R , B O
  • (P1 P3) (P1
    P3)
  • W1 W3 layer 1-3 widths
  • C/e Normalized C per unit conductor length
  • S1 - S3 Layer 1-3 spacing between parallel
    wires
  • Dielectric permittivity of SiO2
  • T1 -- T3 Layer 1-3 conductor thickness
  • H Thickness of dielectric between conductors
  • R Measure of ground plane coverage

24
Middle Layer Capacitance (contd)
  • Line-to-ground C with 1 Ground Plane

(4.19)
25
Middle Layer Capacitance (concl.)
  • O Measure of space and hence capacitance to
    ground plane
  • Line-to-ground C with 2 Ground Planes

(4.20)
26
Middle Layer Capacitance (contd)
  • Line-to-line C with 1 Ground Plane
  • Line-to-line C with 2 Ground Planes

(4.21)
(4.22)
27
Crossover Capacitance
  • Valid range for formulae 0.3 T/H
    10
  • 0.3 W/H 10 0.3
    S/H 10

28
Process Characteristics
  • Thicknesses of layers
  • Thinox 200 Metal1
    6000
  • Field-oxide 6000 M1-M2 Oxide 6000
  • Poly 3000 Metal 2
    12000
  • M1-poly-oxide 6000 Passivation 20000
  • Passivation put over entire chip (except pads) to
    chemically isolate it from the environment.
  • Above formulae give C / per unit conductor
    length

29
Method of Getting Lumped C
C
  • Lumped C ( ) X SiO2 X conductor length

30
Capacitance Spacing Relationship
31
Layout Etching Conditions
  • C calculations must use actual etched layer
    dimensions on chip, not drawn dimensions
  • Example Metal wire drawn 1mm wide but is etched
    at 0.75 mm
  • Use worst-case values Max width thinnest
    dielectric to compute RC delay power
  • Use min. width thickest dielectric to calculate
    gate race conditions

32
Crosstalk Claim
  • Mole claim
  • As interconnections circuitry scale down,
    cross-talk capacitance decreases
  • Reason Required interconnect length decreases
    while cross-talk C / unit length varies little.
  • Holds for analog circuits, not necessarily true
    for digital

33
Capacitors
  • One plate poly, one plate diffusion (usually
    n-well)

34
Poly Diffusion C
  • 0.5 to 1.6 fF / mm2
  • Tolerances 20 (only if well kept 1 V above
    poly voltage)
  • Problems
  • Excessive bottom-plate parasitic junction series
    resistance
  • Non-linearity effects at some voltages

35
Inductors
  • Need a GHz Voltage-Controlled oscillator in
    sub-micron CMOS
  • Choices where phase noise inversely related to
    power consumption
  • Ring oscillator
  • Phase noise L Dw kT R 2,
    gm 1 / R
  • Oscillator based on resonant f of LC tank
  • Active Inductor
  • Phase noise LDw kT
    2, gm 2 w C

w Dw
)
(
w Dw
(
)
2 w C
36
Inductors (continued)
  • Oscillator based on resonant f of LC tank
  • Passive Inductor
  • Phase noise proportional to power consumption
  • LDw kT R 2,
    gm R (w C)2
  • Must make R (series resistance of LC loop) as
    small as possible
  • Inductor options
  • Spiral inductor on Si substrate
  • High substrate losses limits Q factor of filter
    due to induced substrate currents

w Dw
(
)
37
Inductors (continued)
  • Solution etch substrate away underneath inductor
  • Requires extra etching step after normal IC
    processing
  • Not allowed for normal mass production
    (Roufourgan Raol and Roufourgan Abidi)

38
Bond Wire Inductors
  • Use a bond wire inductance for extremely low
    phase noise
  • Bond wire parasitic L 1 nH / mm, very low
    series R
  • Form 2 Ls, using 4 bond wires
  • Phase noise -115 dBc / Hz
  • Offset frequency 200 kHz from 1.8 GHz carrier
  • Power consumption 8 mA at 3 V
  • Bond wire L not characterized for yield in mass
    production industry is reluctant to use this
    method

39
Bond Wire Inductors
40
Recommended Inductor
  • Use a spiral coil on Si substrate without
    modifications
  • Bipolar technologies have no substrate losses,
    due to a high R substrate
  • Sub-micron CMOS doped substrate leads to large
    currents induced in substrate high losses
  • Needs careful optimization of coil design
  • Use 2 metal layers
  • Hollow spiral inductor
  • Power consumption 6 mW
  • Phase noise LDw -116 dBc / Hz at 600 KHz
    offset from 1.8 GHz carrier

41
Hollow Spiral Inductors
42
Inductor Problems in RF Circuits
  • Present-day systems use off-chip C L devices
  • Too expensive to make on-chip L
  • Q factor not high enough for cellular telephones
  • Use off-chip ceramic core inductors (cheap and
    very precise)
  • Q factor of L on chip at 1 GHz went from Q 3
    to Q 6 over last 10 years
  • Noise-to-carrier (N/C) ratios vary as much as 20
    dB at 100 kHz offset

43
More Spiral Inductor Problems
  • Generalized Impedance

  • Z
  • If one end grounded, really get
  • Z R sL
  • R series resistance of winding
  • L what we want
  • C capacitance between metal wire substrate
  • Under-etching the inductor defeats C, but you
    still get R

1 sC
44
Prof. Lus Inductor (Rutgers)
  • Defeat C in on-chip spiral inductor by
  • Using polyimide insulator with better
  • Make multiple layers of inductors on top of chip

45
Summary
  • Analog physical design is important
  • Resistors use a variety of design shapes, each
    allowing laser trimming
  • Capacitors use fringing capacitance to get
    higher values
  • Inductors substrate eddy currents limit
    effectiveness
  • Need to under-etch
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com