Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities

Description:

Jimmi Hendrix was a musical genius. Michael Jordan was an athletic genius ... Congenital factors (e.g., Down's syndrome) or serious brain injury ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:509
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: Bri8194
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities


1
Intelligence and Cognitive Abilities
2
Intelligence
  • What is intelligence? Or, what is (is not )
    intelligent behavior?
  • How do you know if someone is intelligent?
  • If you wanted to find out if someone was
    intelligent what would you do?

3
Intelligence
  • Why are these questions important?

4
Some ideas for intelligent behavior
  • Ability to
  • Think abstractly
  • To plan
  • To gather information
  • To understand complex ideas and to manipulate
    them for later use
  • To solve problems
  • To reason, e.g., deduction and induction
  • To adapt effectively to the environment and
    overcome obstacles
  • To learn from experience
  • To adapt to a novel situation

5
Intelligence
  • Intelligence should be universal
  • Some behaviors everyone should agree are
    intelligent
  • Exactly how intelligence is expressed will differ
    given the context
  • Language skills are good indicators of
    intelligence but would be invalid measure if the
    person did not speak the language

6
Intelligence
  • Cooper definition of mental ability
  • Persons performance on some task that has
    substantial information-processing component when
    the person is trying to perform that task as well
    as possible
  • Traits that relate to cognitive ability and
    information processing

7
Three As
  • Ability
  • Present competence to perform a task
  • Achievement
  • Present competence that reflects specific
    learning experience or instruction
  • Aptitude
  • Potential to acquire particular skills, with
    reference toward future performance

8
Three As
  • Ability
  • Skill you have, e.g., reading or mechanical
    ability
  • Achievement
  • Given instruction what do you now know? E.g.,
    exam in Psy3135
  • Aptitude
  • How well might you performance given appropriate
    instruction motivation? E.g., SAT and college
    performance

9
Under and Overachievers
  • Underachiever
  • Achievement tests or performance falls below what
    would be predicted by aptitude or intellectual
    ability tests
  • Learning disability (LD) defined as 2 SD
    difference between achievement and aptitude
  • Overachiever
  • Achievement tests or performance exceeds the
    level predicted by aptitude or intellectual
    ability tests

10
Three As
  • 3 As are distinct but there is substantial
    overlap
  • In practical terms, its very difficult to
    completely separate them at least in terms of
    measurement

11
Three As
  • Function of educational system is to foster
    cognitive development
  • Therefore, achievement and aptitude tend to be
    tied
  • Also, persons with high aptitude tend to receive
    the most instruction

12
What Intelligence is not
  • Its important to distinguish what intelligence
    is not
  • Not just the opposite of intelligent behavior
  • What does not belong in the content domain of
    intelligence?
  • Why is this important?

13
Not Intelligence
  • Intelligence does not include every skill or
    ability a person could have
  • Jimmi Hendrix was a musical genius
  • Michael Jordan was an athletic genius
  • That doesnt make them an intellectual genius

14
Gardners Theory of Multiple Intelligences
  • 7 different and independent intelligences
  • Linguistic
  • Logical-mathematical
  • Musical
  • Spatial
  • Bodily-kinesthetic
  • Interpersonal
  • Intrapersonal

15
Not Intelligence
  • How can we figure out what is and is not
    intelligence?
  • Remember validity?

16
Intelligence
  • However you want to define or measure it
  • Intelligence is the single most consequential
    individual difference trait
  • Some researchers even think of life as a series
    of poorly defined intelligence tests, i.e.,
    situations that require cognitive reasoning

17
Brief History
  • Sir Francis Galton
  • Father of individual differences
  • Believed intelligence was an inherited
    characteristic
  • Inheritance of eminence
  • Eminent individuals tended to run in families
  • Conducted family studies of eminence

18
Galton study of eminence
  • Eminence occurred aprox. 250 per million
    individuals (.025)
  • The 1000 eminent men he identified came from only
    300 families
  • Therefore, eminence runs in families
  • Any problems with these conclusions?

19
Galton and eminence
  • Reputation only a proxy for intelligence
  • Confound with social status
  • Suggested adoption study to avoid the confound
  • Studied adopted sons of popes

20
Anthropometric Laboratory
  • Galton (later Cattell) devised several
    sensorimotor tests to measure intelligence
  • Make fine discriminations in pitch, sight, or
    texture
  • Physical traits such as head size, arm length,
    grip strength
  • How do you think that turned out?

21
Galton other discoveries
  • Assortative mating
  • clever men marry silly women
  • NO, eminent men marry eminent women
  • Positive manifold
  • men of genius are uhealthy puny being-all brain
    and no muscle-weak sighted and generally poor
    constitutions
  • NO, intellect is associated with health,
    strength, vitality, and long, productive life

22
Range of Human Capacity
  • As many people below the mean as above it
  • Talent deviated from an average
  • Intelligence had a symmetric, normal distribution

23
2 types of Mental Retardation
  • Familial MR
  • Individuals at the low end of the intelligence
    distribution
  • MR due to natural causes mild MR runs in
    families
  • Organic MR
  • MR due to some unusual event
  • Congenital factors (e.g., Downs syndrome) or
    serious brain injury
  • Severe impairment doesnt run in families

24
Alfred Binet
  • Devised first successful and widely used
    intelligence test (1904)
  • Wanted to identify children in public schools
    that will special needs that would require
    intervention
  • Why use a test and not teachers recommendation?

25
Binet and Intelligence tests
  • Intelligence tests are more objective
  • Predict success and allow for ready
    classification
  • Diagnose MR
  • Doctors were consulted, but no standard
  • Develop age norms
  • Establish cut-offs scores

26
Binet Intelligence tests
  • Measure higher mental processes
  • Memory
  • General knowledge
  • Abstract Reasoning
  • Attention
  • Comprehension
  • Coordination
  • Visual judgment

27
Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
  • Evaluate intelligence with respect to age
  • IQ (mental age / chronological age)100

IQ (MA/CA) 100
28
IQ
  • Thus, if a 9-year old can answer questions of the
    same difficulty level as most 12-year-olds then
  • IQ (12/9) 100 133
  • Also, add up many different scales to calculate a
    total score
  • General reasoning ability

29
Binet and IQ
  • How did it work out? Good.
  • Discriminated MR from normal children
  • Discriminated MR from behavior problems
  • IQ scores predicted grades
  • Eventually transplanted to the U.S. by Terman and
    evolved into the Stanford-Binet

30
Spearmans Two-factor Theory (1904)
  • All individual tests of intelligence consist of
    two additive components of variance
  • General variance (g)
  • Specific variance (s)
  • Also error variance, (e)

31
Two-factor Theory
  • g is the variance shared by all tests of
    intelligence
  • General intelligence
  • If two tests are heavily loaded with g, expect
    them to correlate highly

32
Factor Analysis
  • Data reduction technique
  • Identifies latent or unobserved variables that
    account for the correlations among the observed
    variables
  • Each observed variable is a function of the
    latent variable(s)

33
Factor Analysis Continued
  • FA attempts to understand the structure of a
    correlation/covariance matrix by simplifying the
    information
  • An alternative way of organizing the information

34
Factor Loadings
  • Regression coefficient (correlation) between the
    factor and the observed variable
  • How much variance the factor accounts for in the
    observed variable (standardized to 1.0)
  • Higher factor loadings indicate the observed
    variable is a better marker (measure) of the
    factor

35
r voc-memory .50
r arith-memory .39
r voc-arith .55
G-factor
.60
.80
.70
Vocabulary
Arithmetic
Memory
.60
.70
.80
V specific
M specific
A specific
36
r voc-memory .50
r arith-memory .39
r voc-arith .55
G-factor
.60
.80
.70
Vocabulary
Arithmetic
Memory
.40
.55
.45
.45
.55
.58
V specific
A specific
M specific
Error
Error
Error
37
Multiple Factor Theories
  • G is not the whole story
  • Group factors are at a level between specific
    (primary) measures and g
  • These factors are common to a group of tests

38
Rotated Factor Matrix
39
Group Factor Examples
  • From Thurstones Primary Mental Abilities
  • Verbal comprehension (vocabulary)
  • Word fluency (letter naming)
  • Number (capacity for arithmetic)
  • Space (visualizations)
  • Associative memory (paired associates)
  • Perceptual speed (visual processing speed)
  • Reasoning (number series)

40
gf-gc Theory
  • Fluid intelligence (gf)
  • Abilities to think, reason, and acquire new
    knowledge
  • Crystalized intelligence (gc)
  • Knowledge and understanding that a person has
    acquired

41
Hierarchical Theories
  • Integrate the single (g) and multiple group
    factor approaches

42
Hierarchical Structure
  • G is at the top
  • Second level is Major Group Factors
  • Third level is Minor Group Factors
  • Bottom level is specific factors (Spearmans s)

43
Hierarchical Structure
G-factor
Km
Ved
Verbal
Number
Spatial
Visualization
S5
S6
S7
S8
S1
S2
S3
S4
44
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales
  • David Wechsler devised adult intelligence test
    (1939)
  • Now most widely used measure of intelligence for
    adults and children
  • IQ is calculated differently
  • IQ declines as people age

45
Deviation IQ
  • Compare scores to a normative sample of a similar
    age
  • Mean 100, SD 15

Deviation IQ (z-score ?) x
(z-score 15) 100
46
Deviation IQ
  • Average range 85 to 115
  • Gifted range 130
  • Mentally retarded lt 70
  • How does that correspond to SD units?

47
WAIS-IV Subtests
  • 11 subtests, with 3 supplementary scales
  • Full scale IQ
  • Verbal IQ
  • Performance IQ
  • Index Scores
  • Verbal Comprehension
  • Perceptual Organizational
  • Working Memory
  • Processing Speed

48
Verbal Subtests
  • Vocabulary (VC)
  • Define words
  • Best measure of G
  • Similarities (VC)
  • Tell how two things are alike
  • Abstract verbal reasoning
  • Information (VC)
  • Questions of general knowledge
  • Crystalized intelligence

49
Verbal Subtests
  • Arithmetic (WM)
  • Solve arithmetic problems in your head
  • Working memory, mathematical reasoning
  • Digit Span (WM)
  • Repeat a list of numbers forwards and backwards
  • Working memory

50
Performance Subtests
  • Block Design (PO)
  • Make designs using colored cubes
  • Spatial and nonverbal reasoning
  • Matrix Reasoning (PO)
  • Given an incomplete pattern, choose from a number
    of options how to be complete a picture
  • Pattern recognition, non-verbal reasoning

51
Performance Subtests
  • Digit Symbol Coding (PS)
  • Paired associates
  • Each number has a mark put the mark that goes
    with the number
  • Processing speed, learning ability or speed of
    acquisition

52
WAIS-IV Subtests
  • Each subtest assesses slightly different mental
    abilities
  • All a measure of G
  • Multiple measures that assess multiple abilities
    provides a comprehensive measure of a persons
    intelligence
  • Highly reliable
  • Test-retest correlation .90
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com