Very Young Childrens Attention to Childrens Videos as a Function of Program Pacing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Very Young Childrens Attention to Childrens Videos as a Function of Program Pacing

Description:

Alice Ann Howard & Sandra Calvert. Children's Digital Media Center. Georgetown University ... Exploration to Search Model (Huston & Wright, 1983) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: uis9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Very Young Childrens Attention to Childrens Videos as a Function of Program Pacing


1
Very Young Childrens Attention to Childrens
Videos as a Function of Program Pacing
  • Alice Ann Howard Sandra Calvert
  • Childrens Digital Media Center
  • Georgetown University

2
Very Young Childrens Media Use
(Rideout, Vandewater, Wartella, 2005)
3
Pace
  • Rate of Scene Change
  • (new familiar)/total video minutes
  • Rate of Object Change
  • (object character)/total video minutes
  • Total Rate
  • Scene Change Object Change

4
Childrens Attention to TV Programs
  • Comprehensibility Hypothesis (Anderson Lorch,
    1983)
  • children attend to a television program when they
    think they understand what is happening on the
    screen.
  • Children as young as 18 months pay more attention
    to shows that are comprehensible than ones that
    are not (i.e., shows that are distorted or
    rearranged) (Pempek et al., 2007)

5
Childrens Attention to TV Programs
  • Exploration to Search Model (Huston Wright,
    1983)
  • Young childrens attention is initially governed
    more by perceptual salience of the audiovisual
    events (e.g., rapid pace, special effects,
    movement of characters)

6
Developmental Differences in Attention to Pace
(Wright et al., 1984)
  • Younger children (Kindergarteners/1st graders)
    vs.
  • Older children (3rd/4th graders)
  • Younger children had significantly longer
    durations per look during high-paced than
    low-paced TV programs
  • Reverse is true for older children
  • Marginal difference in overall duration of
    attention favoring rapid pace for younger
    children (p

7
Current Questions
  • Does the pace of the program affect very young
    childrens attention to the screen?
  • 6-, 9-, and 12-month-olds
  • If so, do very young children attend more to high
    or low paced programs?
  • Exploration to Search high pace
  • Comprehensibility low pace

8
Pace Coding
  • 56 popular childrens videos were coded
    (Goodrich, Pempek, Calvert, 2009)
  • Rate of Scene Change
  • (new familiar)/total video minutes
  • Rate of Object Change
  • (object character)/total video minutes
  • Total Rate
  • Scene Change Object Change

9
Two Highest Paced Videos
Two Lowest Paced Videos
Set 1
BRT
EE
Set 2
BST
TT
10
(No Transcript)
11
Method
  • Participants
  • 24 6-month-olds (12 males 6 Set 1,6 Set 2)
  • 24 9-month-olds
  • 24 12-month-olds
  • 58 children (29 males)
  • 17 6-mo, 20 9-mo, 21 12-mo
  • 81 White, 2 Black, 17 other

12
Procedure
  • Children were seen in their homes
  • Videos were played on a laptop with child seated
    on the floor in front of mother or on mothers
    lap.
  • Viewed videos consecutively and were encouraged
    to have toys

13
Coding of Attention
  • Percent of Looking
  • Total time with eyes on the screen divided by
    length of the video
  • Average Length per look
  • Total time of eyes on the screen divided by
    frequency of looks to the screen
  • Reliability 14 of the sample
  • r high1 high2 .97
  • r low1 low2 .99

14
Preliminary Results
n 30
n 28
F(1, 56) 1.54, p NS
15
Analyses
  • Mixed ANOVA
  • Within Subject
  • Percent of Looking (High/Low Pace)
  • Between Subject
  • Gender,
  • Age (6, 9, 12 months),
  • Pace of First Video (High/Low)
  • Mixed ANOVA
  • Within Subject
  • Average Length of Look (High/Low Pace)
  • Between Subject
  • Gender,
  • Age, (6, 9, 12 months),
  • Pace of First Video (High/Low)

16
Percent of Looking to the Screen
F(1, 46) 24.85, p 17
Average Length of Look
F(1, 46) 17.22, p 18
Percent of Looking by Pace of 1st Video
t(56) 2.18, p t(30) 6.26, p F(1, 46) 19.81, p 19
Avg. Length of Look by Pace of 1st Video
t(30) 4.15, p F(1, 46) 3.48, p .07
20
Percent of Looking by Age
t(16) 2.76, p t(19) 3.87, p F(2, 46) 2.96, p .06
21
Discussion
  • Across all ages, children paid significantly more
    attention to high paced programs than to low
    paced programs

22
Discussion
  • Difference in attention by pace in 6-mo and 9-mo
    groups, but not in 12-mo group.
  • Supports hypothesis that perceptual salience
    accounts for more attentional variation when
    children are younger (Huston Wright, 1983)
  • In addition to the comprehensibility effects
    (Pempek et al., 2007), there are differences
    based on the perceptual salience of formal
    features

23
Discussion
  • The pace of the first video affected childrens
    percent of looking as well as their average
    length of look
  • Attention drops off significantly during Low pace
    if High pace is seen first.
  • There is no drop in attention if Low pace is seen
    first.

24
Implications
  • What do these findings mean for the development
    of attention?

25
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com