Title: Reuse of public sector information Riga, 19 October 2005
1Re-use of public sector informationRiga,
19 October 2005
European trends and the Latvian perspective
- Luis FerrãoEuropean Commission
- DG Information Society and Media
2Public Sector Informationa key resource
- Public sector a major source of information
- Geographic, transport, statistics, weather,
legal - information increasingly accessible online
- Improved communication between Administrations
and citizens - PSI an important economic resource
3but under-exploited
- Value of EU investment on PSI
- 68 billion /year or 1 of GDP
- Value of the whole information sector (largely
based on PSI) in the US - 750 billion /year or 9 of GDP
- (Pira International, Commercial Exploitation of
Europes Public Sector Information, 2000)
4The challenge
- PSI a raw material of major importance for the
content market - Barriers remain at European level
- Competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis the US
- Diverging trend of re-use conditions
5The barriers
difficulties to produce European products
- Absence of clear rules and policies
- No legal framework for PSI re-use
- Mindset of public sector bodies
- Little re-use culture and public-private sinergy
- Unfair competition
- Exclusive agreements, cross-subsidies
- Lack of transparency
- On available PSI, re-use conditions and means of
reddress - High charges
- Neither proportionate to cost nor limited
6Towards an European solution
- The Green Book (1999)
- The Communication (2001)
- Set of consistent measures
- Projects, PSI Group
- The Directive (co-decided in November 2003)
7(No Transcript)
8Communication, 2001
-
- Economic importance, fragmented market
- Right to commercial use of accessible PSI
- Basic orientations price,
transparency, competition - Explore the need for a Directive
9Directive, 2003
- Minimal harmonisation to facilitate cross-border
re-use - Transparency of price and conditions
- Prohibition of exclusive arrangements
- Non-discrimination between users
- Clear procedures, means of redress
- Assets lists, online licenses
10Means of redress
- Mandatory communication of means of redress
-
- Instrumental to an open, transparent and
non-discriminatory PSI environment - Downwards effect on charges and re-use conditions
11Means of redress the principles
- transparency (Art. 4.4 and 7, recital 15)
- Obligation to inform the applicants on means of
redress against decisions and practices affecting
them - legality (Art. 4.3)
- Obligation to substantiate negative decisions or
those imposing re-use charges
12Re-use at no cost or other conditions
- Disclaimer (of liability)
- Waiving (of rights)
- Restrictions (to the reproduction of logos,
lay-out, seals) - Acknowledgement (of the source)
no license required
13Re-use at no cost or other conditions
- Advantages of no-license approach
- Fast and easy (less red tape)
- Reduce overheads (set plus collect charges)
- Allow PSB to focus on core tasks (rather than
monitor license agreements)
US approach
14Re-use at cost or other conditions
-
-
- - not to unnecessarily restrict (Art. 8.1)
- Possibilities for re-use (derivative works,
added-value products) - Competition (grant-back obligations)
-
License agreement
15Licenses - requirements
- Reasonable time-limit, consistent with access one
(art. 4.1) - Refusal properly substantiated, on the basis of
access regime, absence of re-use autorisation or
Directive exclusions (art. 4.3) - Charges, if any, limited to collection,
production, reproduction and dissemination costs
reasonable return on investment (Art. 6)
16Licences - conditions
- Should not discriminate comparable categories of
re-users, whether public or private art. 10.1 - Should not be exclusive, unless necessary for the
provision of a service in the general interest,
nor lead to cross-subsidies - art. 10.2 - Exclusive rights, if any, subject to regular
review and only to the extent necessary to
provide a service in the general interest - art.
11.1 -
17Licenses practical arrangements
- MS to ensure proper offer of (art. 8.2)
- standard forms available in digital form for PSI
re-use - Adaptable for particular license applications
- Electronically processed
18Online licenses
-
- Validity and enforcement issues (proof of
consent) - Distance contracts Directive 97/7/EC
- Electronic commerce Directive 2000/31/EC
- Electronic signatures Directive 1999/93/EC
same requirements as off-line
19Review Article 13.2
- Scope
- exclusions, art. 1.2
- impact
- Increase on PSI re-use
- Effects of the charging principles
- Re-use of official texts of an administrative or
legal nature (Art. 2.4 Berne) - Further improvement
- Of the functioning of the Internal Market
- Of the European content industry
20Some questions
- Commercial law, not freedom of information one
- Intellectual property rights of public sector
bodies - Charges (criteria, calculation method)
- Additional burden imposed on Administrations
Discussion also at Member States level
21Outlook
- transparency, fair competition, downwards effect
on charges - First ever legislation in some Member States
- Speed-up developments in others
- Recitals go beyond Articles, but
- Review clause
culture change in public sector
22What next
- Transposition by 1.07.2005 (expired)
- Transposition in Latvia
- Role of the Commission
- PSI Group three meetings in 2004, one in 2005
- Comparative study MEPSIR (29/10/2004
29/04/2006) - Exploitation of Public Sector Information
Benchmarking of Eu framework conditions - Review in 2008
23Transposition chart
- 13 MS notified transposition
- AT, DK, EE, FI, FR, HU, IE, LT, PL, SE, SI, SK
and UK - (AT and LT partial)
- 12 MS did not notified transposition
- BE, CY, CZ, DE, EL, ES, IT, LU, LV, MT, NL and PT
Status 18 October 2005
24Conclusion
- PSI a major component of the content market
- Barriers restrict full impact on employment and
growth - Directive creates minimal legal security to
stimulate investment - Proper, timely transposition will help to build
up new European framework for PSI re-use
25To know more
http//europa.eu.int/information_society/policy/ps
i/