Impersonal Sociotechnical Capital, ICTs and Collective Action Among Strangers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Impersonal Sociotechnical Capital, ICTs and Collective Action Among Strangers

Description:

... prominence both for job placement (monster.com) and for dating (match.com) ... venue selection made by attendees themselves, coordinated through meetup.com ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: hughessu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Impersonal Sociotechnical Capital, ICTs and Collective Action Among Strangers


1
Impersonal Sociotechnical Capital, ICTs and
Collective Action Among Strangers
  • By Paul Resnick, 2004

2
Agenda
  • Case Definitions
  • ICTs
  • What can ICTs support?
  • Progression of ICTs
  • Areas Ripe for Transformation
  • News Monitoring and Opinion Formation
  • Grassroots politics
  • Semi-public transportation
  • Conclusion

3
Case Definitions
  • Capital a resource that can be accumulated and
    whose availability allows people to create value
    for themselves or others.
  • Physical capital buildings and tools
  • Financial capital money allowing people to
    acquire resources
  • Social capital productive resources that inhere
    in social relations can facilitate useful
    interactions among people
  • Impersonal social capital social resources not
    based on personal connections at all (I.e.
    Shared knowledge, shared values, price signals,
    monitoring and sanctioning systems)
  • Sociotechnical capital - Productive resources
    that inhere in patterns of social relations that
    are maintained with the support of information
    and communication technologies (ICTs).

4
ICTs
  • Information and communication technologies
  • Recommender systems
  • Introducer systems
  • Reputation systems
  • Can be used to support personal relationships
  • Bridge time and distance
  • Useful in supporting impersonal forms of social
    capital where affective ties are not needed

5
What can ICTs support?
  • Computers can search, sort and select on the
    basis of geographic coordinates
  • Might enable people to make connections within
    their neighborhood without ever knowing the
    people down the street (I.e. www.UpMyStreet.com)
  • Taste Matching or recommendation sharing among
    people who may not know each other or be
    explicitly aware of each others interests
  • People can get personalized recommendations from
    each other without ever establishing a personal
    relationship (I.e. www.amazon.com)
  • Behavior monitoring that gathers information
    about peoples past behavior and makes it
    available to others
  • Can enable the maintenance of trust in a large
    online interaction environment Past reputations
    are somewhat informative in predicting future
    problems (I.e. www.ebay.com)

6
Progression of ICTs
  • Income effect an increase in how much the
    function is performed overall because that
    function has become less expensive relative to
    other goods in the economy
  • Same framework is used to help us understand and
    perhaps foresee potential impacts of
    technologically-mediated forms of impersonal
    social capital

7
Areas Ripe for Transformation
  • A Substitution of impersonal sociotechnical
    capital for forms of impersonal social capital
    that do not rely on technology
  • Ebays reputation system is a partial substitute
    for legal enforcement of fair trade
  • Private, electronically-mediated dispute
    resolution services such as Square Trade
    partially substitute for legal adjudication at
    substantially lower costs
  • Instead of markets we see the emergence of barter
    systems with computers maintaining accounts to
    ensure equitable patters of exchange over time
  • Instead of long-lived organizations with clear
    external boundaries and internal roles, we see ad
    hoc groups using ICTs to organize their efforts
    in areas such as technology standard setting,
    software development

8
Areas Ripe for Transformation
  • Income effect, should lead to more reliance on
    impersonal social capital of all kinds,
    technologically mediated or not
  • While personal connections are still available,
    computerized matching services are gaining
    prominence both for job placement (monster.com)
    and for dating (match.com)
  • When choosing media, restaurants, products,
    people are turning to the word of mouse of
    strangers on sites like amazon.com and
    epinions.com, and not just the word of mouth of
    their friends

9
Areas Ripe for Transformation
  • Emergence of new institutional structures and
    ways of life that would have been impractical
    without impersonal sociotechnical capital
  • News Monitoring and Opinion Formation
  • Grassroots Politics
  • Semi-public Transportation

10
News Monitoring and Opinion Formation
  • Internet has broken the mass medias near
    monopoly on publishing information about current
    events
  • Still some concerns about accuracy and validity
  • Recommender systems are helping with this
  • If a large number or readers begin to depend on
    these distributed recommending processes, the
    levers of influence for shaping public opinion
    will shift considerably

11
Grassroots Politics
  • Electoral politics more reliance on impersonal
    social capital and less on mass media, mass
    mailings or endorsements from prominent
    individuals
  • October 2003 70,000 people reportedly attended
    simultaneous informal events for Howard Dean/
    venue selection made by attendees themselves,
    coordinated through meetup.com
  • Rather than old-style ward organization (where
    favors are traded among people who have
    established loyalties), we should expect to see a
    looser network, with information sharing and
    mobilization of coordinated action mediated by
    ICTS
  • Moveon.org once people are joined, personal
    connections are not critical to any of the forms
    of participation

12
Semi-public Transportation
  • Ride Sharing
  • Tremendous amount of unused transportation in
    unoccupied seats in private vehicles. Filling
    these seats would reduce smog, congestion and
    fuel consumption and might also create
    opportunities for increasing local social capital
    as people conversed in the car
  • Barriers coordination of routes and schedules,
    safety risks, social discomfort with sharing
    private spaces and an imbalance of costs and
    benefits among the effected parties
  • Use of technology-based monitoring and reputation
    systems could reduce some of the trust problems
  • Computers could authenticate drivers and riders
  • Deviations from expected routes could trigger
    phone calls to confrim nothing had gone wrong
  • Technology could be used to coordinate the
    matching of rides to riders
  • Impersonal sociotechnical capital may lead to a
    system of semi-public transportation in private
    vehicles that replaces public transportation
    entirely

13
Conclusion
  • Mediated communication displaces, substitutes for
    and complements face-to-face interactions
  • Larger structural transformations in society are
    likely to arise from new forms of organized
    interaction among strangers that ICTs can enable
  • These transformations are not inevitable and may
    not even be good for society
  • It is worth while to try and anticipate where
    they might occur
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com