PowerPoint Presentation Lecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

PowerPoint Presentation Lecture

Description:

machine v. tool v. medium ... tool: This makes a machine different from a tool which is a single element held ... Laurel on plays and CHI ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: warren1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Lecture


1
computers as theater fdm 20c introduction to
digital media lecture 15.05.2003
warren sack / film digital media department /
university of california, santa cruz
2
last time
  • machiavelli a life
  • excerpts from the prince
  • latour on heterogeneous engineering/
    sociotechnical rhetorics
  • mapping the actor-networks of a newsgroup
  • a definition of media as machinations

3
to map a discussion using actor-networks
  • list all of the possible actants
  • pick one actant -- this will be your first point
    of view (pov)
  • examine how the list of actants are linked
    together from the first pov
  • pick a second, third, fourth, etc. actant and
    examine the links between all of the rest of the
    actants from each of these povs
  • pay attention to exchanges (e.g., replies)
    between actants follow how actants are recruited
    from from one network into another, from one
    side to another

4
the actor-network graph from rec.arts.movies
5
machine v. tool v. medium
  • machine A machine, as its name implies, is first
    of all, a machination, a stratagem, a kind of
    cunning, where borrowed forces keep one another
    in check so that none can fly apart from the
    group.
  • tool This makes a machine different from a tool
    which is a single element held directly in the
    hand of a man or a woman.
  • Latour, Science in Action, p. 129
  • medium A medium is a material, device, or
    process that holds people together or separates
    them apart from one another. I.e., a medium is a
    machine in Latours terms.

6
outline
  • computers as theater
  • types of theater
  • Aristotles Poetics
  • Boals Poetics of the Oppressed
  • actors, characters, and actants
  • role-playing and imitation

7
Aristotles Poetics
  • if computers are theater, then what kind of
    theater are they?
  • Laurel thinks they are Aristotelian theater.
  • Beginning from Aristotles Poetics
  • I propose to treat of Poetry in itself and of
    its various kinds, noting the essential quality
    of each, to inquire into the structure of the
    plot as requisite to a good poem into the number
    and nature of the parts of which a poem is
    composed and similarly into whatever else falls
    within the same inquiry. Following, then, the
    order of nature, let us begin with the principles
    which come first. Epic poetry and Tragedy, Comedy
    also and Dithyrambic poetry, and the music of
    the flute and of the lyre in most of their forms,
    are all in their general conception modes of
    imitation. They differ, however, from one another
    in three respects- the medium, the objects, the
    manner or mode of imitation, being in each case
    distinct. For as there are persons who, by consci
    ous art or mere habit, imitate and represent
    various objects through the medium of color and
    form, or again by the voice so in the arts above
    mentioned, taken as a whole, the imitation is
    produced by rhythm, language, or 'harmony,'
    either singly or combined.

8
Laurel on Aristotle
  • One of Aristotles fundamental ideas about drama
    (as well as other forms of literature) is that a
    finished play is an organic whole. He used the
    term organic to evoke an analogy with living
    things. Insofar as a whole organism is more than
    the sum of its parts, all of the parts are
    necessary for life, and the parts have certain
    necessary relationships to one another. He
    identified six qualitative elements of drama and
    suggested the relationships among them in terms
    of formal and material cause. (p. 564)

9
Laurels exegesis of Aristotle
  • action
  • character
  • thought
  • language
  • melody
  • spectacle Aristotle described the fundamental
    material element of drama as spectacle -- all
    that is seen.

10
Laurel on plays and CHI
  • Plays, like human-computer activities, are closed
    universes in the sense that they delimit the set
    of potential actions. ...it is key to the
    success of a dramatic representation that all of
    the materials that are formulated into action are
    drawn from the circumscribed potential of the
    particular dramatic world. Whenever this
    principle is violated, the organic unity of the
    work is diminished... (p. 568)

11
Boal on theater
  • The bourgesoise already knows what the world is
    like, their world, and is able to present images
    of this complete finished world. The bourgeoise
    presents the spectacle.
  • On the other hand, the proletariat and the
    oppressed classes do not know yet what their
    world will be like consequently their theater
    will be the rehearsal not the finished spectacle.
    (p. 346)

12
Boal on Aristotle, oppression and the oppressed
  • ...the poetics of Aristotle is the poetics of
    oppression the world is known, perfect, or about
    to be perfected, and all of its values are
    imposed on the spectators who passively delegate
    power to the characters to act and think in their
    place.
  • The poetics of the oppressed is essentially the
    poetics of liberation the spectator no longer
    delegates power to the characters either to think
    or to act in his place. The spectator frees
    himself he thinks and acts for himself!
  • Theater is action! (p. 352)

13
Bertholt Brechts epic theater
  • The dramatic theater's spectator says Yes, I
    have felt like that too-- Just like me--It's only
    natural-- It'll never change--The sufferings of
    this man appall me, because they are
    inescapable--That's great art it all seems the
    most obvious thing in the world--I weep when they
    weep, I laugh when they laugh.
  • The epic theater's spectator says I'd never
    have thought it -- That's not the way -- That's
    extraordinary, hardly believable -- It's got to
    stop -- The sufferings of this man appall me,
    because they are unnecessary -- That's great art
    nothing obvious in it -- I laugh when they weep,
    I weep when they laugh. (Brecht)

14
Laurel on action and agents
  • In a purely Aristotelian sense, an agent is one
    who takes action. Interestingly, Aristotle
    admits of the possibility of a play without
    characters, but a play without action cannot
    exist. This suggests that agency as part of
    representation need not be strictly embodied in
    characters as we normally think of them -- that
    is, as representations of humans. Using the
    broadest definition, computer programs that
    perform actions that are perceived by people can
    be said to exhibit agency in some form. (p.
    568-569)
  • compare this to Latours actants

15
Laurel on Aristotle
  • In drama, character may be defined as bundles of
    traits, predispositions, and choices that, when
    taken together, form coherent entities. (p. 568)

16
characters as bundles
  • who gets to choice which associations are linked
    with whom or what?
  • whats the difference between
  • building a reputation and,
  • gaining a reputation?
  • recalling my exchange with jill walker about
    online caroline

17
characters, reputations, identities
  • what are these bundles of traits,
    predispositions, and choices that, when taken
    together, form coherent entities?
  • what is a coherent entity?
  • race
  • class
  • gender
  • sexuality

18
nakamura project statement
  • My study, which I would characterize as
    ethnographic, with certain important
    reservations, focuses on the ways in which race
    is "written" In the cyberspace locus called
    LambdaMOO, as well as the ways it is read by
    other players, the conditions under which it is
    enunciated, contested, and ultimately erased and
    suppressed, and the ideological implications of
    these performative acts of writing and reading
    otherness. What does the way race is written in
    Lambda MOO reveal about the enunciation of
    difference in new electronic media? Have the
    rules of the game changed, and if so, how?

19
what is lambdaMOO?
  • lambda.moo.mud.org, port 8888

20
nakamura on identity tourism
  • Tourism is a particularly apt metaphor to
    describe the activity of racial identity
    appropriation, or "passing" in cyberspace. The
    activityof "surfing," (an activity already
    associated with tourism in the mind of most
    Americans) the Internet not only reinforces the
    idea that cyberspace is not only a place where
    travel and mobility are featured attractions, but
    also figures it as a form of travel which is
    inherently recreational, exotic, and exciting,
    like surfing. The choice to enact oneself as a
    samurai warrior in LambdaMOO constitutes a form
    of identity tourism which allows a player to
    appropriate an Asian racial identity without any
    of the risks associated with being a racial
    minority in real life. While this might seem to
    offer a promising venue for non-Asian characters
    to see through the eyes of the Other by
    performing themselves as Asian through on-line
    textual interaction, the fact that the personae
    chosen are overwhelmingly Asian stereotypes
    blocks this possibility by reinforcing these
    stereotypes.

21
what are the risks of online role playing?
  • can racial and sexual crimes take place online?
  • what is the violence of a comment like nakamura
    quotes Seems to me, if you include your race in
    your description, you are making yourself the
    sacrificial lamb. I don't include 'caucasian' in
    my description (lambdaMOO player)
  • a story from julian dibbell, rape in cyberspace

22
next time
  • media ownership
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com