PublicPrivate Partnerships PPPs Greenfield Projects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

PublicPrivate Partnerships PPPs Greenfield Projects

Description:

Tampa South Crosstown, Mid-Bay Bridge. 5. Tolling and PPPs ... Design/Construction efficiency Forming Joint Ventures ... 331 Widening (bridge) New Corridors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: dotSt3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PublicPrivate Partnerships PPPs Greenfield Projects


1
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)Greenfield
Projects
February 28, 2007
2
What is a Greenfield Project?
  • New Alignment or Corridor
  • Little supporting development at the facility
  • The developer has a plain piece of paper
  • Offers greater flexibility, but with more risk
  • Generally, the developer must be patient, but has
    greater impact on the outcome

3
New Corridors
  • Anticipate all will be tolled
  • Over 91 of new corridors in Florida over past 15
    years are toll facilities
  • Likely future new corridors and possibly new
    lanes on re-use corridors to be tolled

4
Florida Tolling Model
  • Toll Systems leverage overall system to improve
    existing facilities and build new toll
    facilities
  • Turnpike System
  • Authorities like Orlando-Orange Co. Expressway
    Authority and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority
  • Start Up Toll Facilities generally subsidized to
    jump start
  • Toll Facilities Revolving Trust Fund loans,
    Operations Maintenance (OM) covenants/subsidies
  • DOT operates/maintains
  • Tampa South Crosstown, Mid-Bay Bridge

5
Tolling and PPPs
  • New Corridors likely to be financed through
    tolling
  • Demonstrated willingness to accept/use toll
    facilities in most major urban areas
  • Examine and consider all possibilities including
    PPPs and existing models for tolling
  • PPPs may offer advantages in some situations to
    advance the corridor forward

6
Why Choose P3 as Option?
  • Traditional sources are committed to existing
    projects
  • P3 will bring additional investment funds to
    develop asset
  • Toll Revenue
  • Private Sector Financing
  • Delivery Time for Project

7
Why Choose P3 as Option?
  • State performs a value for money analysis
  • Used to determine best approach to timely
    delivery of asset (Public/Private)
  • Determines financial capacity and Gap
  • Defines potential funding solutions and
    approaches
  • Turnpike
  • Expressway Authority
  • Public Private partnership

8
What drives Decision - Risk
  • Key Greenfield Assumptions
  • It is all about the risk profile for the project
  • Development Risk Need Now
  • Political Risk Local Priority
  • Operational Risk New Technology
  • Revenue Risk Does not meet traditional
    feasibility test requirements or to large for
    existing toll system options (TP)
  • Risk equals Cost/Time
  • Developer will price each risk
  • Term is partially defined to recover cost of Risk

9
Working to each others strengths!
  • Typically developers want public sector to
  • Do majority or all environmental work Define
    Project
  • Acquire majority of ROW
  • Interact with Local Authorities Buy In
  • Private side primarily focused on
  • Design/Construction efficiency Forming Joint
    Ventures
  • Traffic Long Term Traffic Revenue View
  • Toll rates Generally Market based
  • Maintenance and Operations
  • Concession period Tailored to financing need
    30-75 yrs
  • Revenue Stream Participation/Sharing

10
Facilitating PPPs in Florida
  • Some Greenfield Toll Corridors being considered
  • First Coast Outer Beltway
  • I-595 Ft Lauderdale - Express Lanes
  • US 331 Widening (bridge)
  • New Corridors
  • Interstate/Turnpike Express Lanes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com