Family Policy from a Public Goods Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Family Policy from a Public Goods Perspective

Description:

... Grunewald. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Family Policy from a Public Goods Perspective ... Facilitate labor force participation of mothers. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: evala
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Family Policy from a Public Goods Perspective


1
Family Policy from a Public Goods Perspective
Rob Grunewald Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis
2
Choices for Family Policy Objectives
  • Support the family with child-rearing.
  • Encourage larger (or smaller) families.
  • Promote marriage with child-rearing.
  • Facilitate labor force participation of mothers.
  • Facilitate at-home role for mothers discourage
    working while children are young.
  • Protect children against abuse and neglect.
  • Facilitate balancing work and family life.
  • Help family cope with crises and transitions.

3
Key Economic Concepts
  • Public goods
  • Characterized by non-rivalry and
    non-excludability
  • Externalities
  • Benefits or costs that accrue to people other
    than the producer or consumer

4
Families Public Goods Characteristics and
Positive Externalities
  • Child-rearing role
  • More engaged citizens democracy works better
  • Better prepared workforce
  • Less likely to commit crime or require social
    assistance
  • Mutual support among family members
  • Limits use of public safety nets
  • Well-functioning families may be better able to
    help others in need

5
Market Forces
  • More married women in the workforce
  • Fewer children per family
  • Immigration
  • Mobility
  • Job mix

6
Public Policy Forces
  • Explicit policies designed to achieve specific
    objectives for individuals in their family roles
    or the family unit as a whole.
  • Implicit actions in other policy domains that
    have consequences for children and their
    families, such as tax policy, education finance
    and reform, labor regulations, consumer
    protection.

7
High/Scope Study of Perry Preschool
  • In early 1960s, 123 children from low-income
    families in Ypsilanti, Mich.
  • Children randomly selected to attend Perry or
    control group.
  • High-quality program with well trained teachers,
    daily classroom sessions and weekly home visits.
  • Tracked participants and control group through
    age 40.

8
Perry Educational Effects
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
9
Perry Economic Effects at Age 40
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
10
Perry Arrested 5 or More Times Before Age 40
Source High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
11
Perry PreschoolCosts and Benefits Over 62 Years
12
Perry Preschool Estimated Return on
Investment
  • Benefit-Cost Ratio 17 to 1
  • Annual Rate of Return 18
  • Public Rate of Return 16

13
Benefit-Cost Ratios for Other Longitudinal Studies
  • Abecedarian Educational Child Care
  • 4 to 1
  • Chicago-Child Parent
  • 7 to 1
  • Elmira Prenatal/Early Infancy Project
  • 5 to 1

14
Private and Public BenefitsCase Study Child
Care
  • Early childhood education
  • Private Child is more likely to succeed in
    school and earn more money in workforce.
  • Public Child is a better student, less likely to
    require special education, commit crime, or
    require social welfare. More skilled worker
    higher economic growth and tax revenue.

15
Private and Public BenefitsCase Study Child
Care
  • Parents can participate in workforce
  • Private Higher family income, businesses have
    larger supply of labor from which to hire,
    high-quality child care availability improves
    productivity.
  • Public Boosts economic vitality, raises tax
    revenue, produces more family-friendly place to
    live.

16
Private and Public BenefitsCase Study Child
Care
  • Child care is a large industry
  • Private Child care operations can organize,
    lobby, take advantage of pooled resources, and
    provide employment opportunities for laborers.
  • Public A large employer that spends money in
    local economy. (But several industries can make a
    similar argument.)

17
References
  • Davies, P. (December 2003). Wives at Work. The
    Region, 4 (17), 12-15, 76-79. http//www.minneapol
    isfed.org/pubs/region/03-12/davies.cfm
  • Grunewald, R., Rolnick, A. J. (December 2003).
    Early childhood development Economic development
    with a high public return. The Region, 4
    Supplement(17), 6-12. http//www.minneapolisfed.or
    g/research/studies/earlychild/abc-part2.pdf
  • Kammerman, Sheila B. (1999). Child and Family
    Policies An International Overview. In E.F.
    Zigler, S.L. Kagan, N.W. Hall (Eds.), Children,
    Families Government Preparing for the
    Twenty-first Century. New York Cambridge
    University Press.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com