What is a theory of global justice Rawls theory of justice' Rawls theory of a law of peoples a criti - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

What is a theory of global justice Rawls theory of justice' Rawls theory of a law of peoples a criti

Description:

Different meanings of justice. Rectifying justice : injustice is done ... liberal ... one should not assume that liberal notions of human nature and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:799
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: granco
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is a theory of global justice Rawls theory of justice' Rawls theory of a law of peoples a criti


1
What is a theory of global justice? Rawls
theory of justice. Rawls theory of a law of
peoples a critique
  • Göran Collste
  • Centre for Applied Ethics

2
(No Transcript)
3
just-making properties
  • Equality
  • Liberty
  • Human rights

4
Different meanings of justice
  • Rectifying justice injustice is done-correction
    is needed
  • Retributive justice someone has inflicted harm
    punishment needed
  • Distributive justice distribution of values or
    disvalues

5
  • John Rawls A Theory of Justice (1971)
  • Justice is the first virtue of social
    institutions, as truth is of systems of thought
    (p3)

6
(No Transcript)
7
  • The primary subject of justice is the basic
    structure of society ( economic and political
    institutions)
  • The aim of justice to compensate for the outcome
    of the natural lottery

8
Rawls method
  • 1. Choice of principles under the veil of
    ignorance
  • Rationality
  • Maximin rule rank alternatives by the worst
    possible outcome (you can belong to the
    lowest/poorest group in the real society)
  • Cohere with a sense of justice, moral intuitions
    that we have about justice
  • 2. Apply the principles to the real, existing
    society (basic structure) as moral guidance

9
Rawls two principles of justice
  • First principle
  • Each person is to have an equal right to the most
    extensive total system of equal basic liberties
    compatible with a similar system of liberty for
    all
  • Second principle
  • Social and economic inequalities are to be
    arranged so that they are both
  • (a) to the greatest benefit of the least
    advantaged, consistent with the just savings
    principle, and
  • (b) attached to offices and positions open to all
    under conditions of fair equality of opportunity
    (Rawls, 1971 p. 303)
  • justice as fairness

10
  • Libertarian critique Rawls redistribution/taxati
    on threatens freedom and property rights (Nozick)
  • Communitarian critique Justice is understood and
    anchored in different communities (Sandel, Walzer)

11
Political Liberalism 1993
  • a theory of justice for plural societies (in
    contrast to comprehensive liberalism)
  • .. the same principles are chosen for plural
    societies under a veil of ignorance
  • butNot a universal rationality but overlapping
    consensus justification based on different
    comprehensive doctrines

12
Justice in an age of globalisation?
  • Jan Aart Scholte political theory and political
    philosophy suffer from methodological
    territorialism

13
Law of Peoples, (1993) 1999
  • Law of Peoples, a particular political
    conception of right and justice that applies to
    the principles and norms of international law and
    practice
  • A realistic utopia

14
Two original positions/contracts
  • 1) Within each liberal society
  • 2) Global contract between different peoples
    but not a world state

15
Rawls Law of Peoples
  • Peoples are ..
  • free and independent
  • Observe treaties
  • equal
  • Duty of non-interference
  • Right of self-defence
  • Honour human rights
  • Restrictions in the conduct of war
  • Duty of assistance

16
but not the Difference principle (Rawls)
  • Social and economic inequalities are to be
    arranged so that they are both, (a) to the
    greatest benefit of the least advantaged and (b)
    attached to offices and positions open to all
    under conditions of fair equality and opportunity

17
Global inequality
  • 582 million earn 146 billion 200 persons earn
    1042 billion
  • 1 billion lack clean water
  • 2.4 billion have insufficient sanitary equipment
  • 1 billion people (out of six) earn less than
    1/day 3 billion less than 2/day

18

19
BNP/capita
Norberg 2007
20
Income/capita
UNDP 2003
21
  • implications of applying the idea of the natural
    lottery globally?
  • But Rawls says no, Why?

22
Rawls argument against global difference
principle
  • each society has the potential of its own to
    realise justice
  • one should not assume that liberal notions of
    human nature and of distributive justice are
    acceptable to every people in the world
  • global inequality is not caused by unequal
    natural resources but by differences in political
    culture.
  • no target or cutoff point..
  • Rawlss alternative a duty of assistence

23
Questionable assumptions
  • Poverty in the Third world is not related to
    involuntary economic and political dependence on
    the part of the poorer nations
  • Rawls assumes that a people can be considered as
    a unit
  • Rawls assumes that poverty is not the result of a
    lack of natural resources or of traditions or
    cultures that now living peoples have not chosen
  • The duty of assistance do not question the global
    structure
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com