i247: Information Visualization and Presentation Marti Hearst - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

i247: Information Visualization and Presentation Marti Hearst

Description:

Mapping quantities into shapes does not work! 10 100. But using extent ... good for highlighting. Slope / Shape. no intrinsic meaning; good for contrast. 17 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: coursesIs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: i247: Information Visualization and Presentation Marti Hearst


1
i247 Information Visualization and
PresentationMarti Hearst
Design Choices in Building Basic Graphs    
2
Few on How to Show Information
3
Few on Showing Information
4
Few on Showing Information
5
Few on How to Show Information
6
Few on How to Show Information
7
Few on Showing Information
8
Few on Showing Information
9
Which Types of Graphs for Which Kinds of Data?
10
Combining Data Types in Graphs
11
Last time Class exercise
  • What did people find?

12
Example Titanic Data
  • The data contains counts of women, men, children,
    the class of room they had, if they were
    passengers or crew, and if they survived or not.
  • What kinds of questions to we want to ask of this
    data?

13
Which Properties are Appropriate for Which
Information Types?
14
Bertins Graphical Vocabulary
  • Position
  • Marks
  • Points
  • Lines
  • Areas
  • Retinal variables
  • Color
  • Size
  • Shape
  • Grayscale
  • Orientation
  • Texture

15
Key Idea
  • How should data of various types be encoded into
    visual features?
  • Mapping quantities into shapes does not work!
  • 10 100
  • But using extent works well

16
Interpretations of Graphical Vocabulary
  • Some properties can be discriminated more
    accurately but dont have intrinsic meaning
  • (Senay Ingatious 97, Kosslyn, others)
  • Density (Greyscale)
  • Darker -gt More
  • Size / Length / Area
  • Larger -gt More
  • Position
  • Leftmost -gt first,
  • Topmost -gt first
  • Hue
  • no intrinsic meaning
  • good for highlighting
  • Slope / Shape
  • no intrinsic meaning
  • good for contrast

17
Accuracy Ranking of Quantitative Perceptual
TasksEstimated only pairwise comparisons have
been validated.(Mackinlay 88 from Cleveland
McGill)
18
Expressiveness rankings for Info Vis tasks
Bertin, adapted from Spence 2006
19
Which properties used for what?
  • Fews Table

20
More to come
  • Well also talk about Gestalt properties later,
    when we discuss perceptual principles in more
    detail.

21
Next Time
  • Well also talk about Gestalt properties later,
    when we discuss perceptual principles in more
    detail.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com