Residential Broadband - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Residential Broadband

Description:

Comcast. Time Warner Brothers. Cox. Charter. Cablevision. New ... Cox, Comcast. Telecom companies converging from telephony to video - SBC, Bellsouth, AOL ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: EEC8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Residential Broadband


1
Residential Broadband
  • Group A
  • John Chuang
  • Tushar Dani
  • Ilin Tsai
  • Ilya Bagrak
  • Alexandra Fedyukova

2
Residential Broadband
  • Introduction
  • Market and competition
  • Technology
  • Economics
  • Policy and regulation
  • Conclusion

3
What is Residential Broadband
  • Technologies that provide a high-bandwidth
    connection to the Internet for residential
    consumers
  • Replacement for the now fading residential
    dial-up technology
  • Entirely new online experience
  • Watching a video stream,
  • Downloading music in seconds,
  • Video and voice chats
  • Real-time gaming
  • This presentation is limited to US residential
    Broadband market

4
Growth and Penetration
  • Fast growth, 11 increase per year
  • Reached more than 50 penetration already across
    internet households
  • Several competing broadband service providers
  • Telephone companies, wireless carriers, cable TV
    service providers and satellite providers

5
Players
  • DSL
  • SBC
  • Verizon
  • Bellsouth
  • Quest
  • Cable
  • Comcast
  • Time Warner Brothers
  • Cox
  • Charter
  • Cablevision
  • New technologies
  • Wi-Fi (Google cloud in San Francisco, hot spots)
  • Satellite Signals
  • Wi-Max
  • BPL (broadband over power lines)

6
Market segments Prices 1
  • Competition for Broadband subscribers is
    bifurcating
  • Low end emphasizing price
  • High end emphasizing speed
  • DSL companies primarily target low price segment
  • Started penetrating into high end market,
    Verizons FiOS (15 mbps)
  • Cable companies have elected to stay exclusively
    at the high end
  • Bundling as a way to reduce churn rate attract
    new customers
  • Triple and even quadruple play

7
Market segments Prices 2
8
DSL Technology
  • Limited distance to central office (CO)
  • Dedicated line from CO to home
  • Asymmetric flow
  • Typical speeds up to 1.5Mbits/s downstream

9
Cable Technology
  • Shared lines to the nearest splitter
  • Generally higher speeds
  • Reaches more households since distance limitation
    is removed
  • Typical offering 4Mbits/s
  • Last Mile advantage

10
Future Technology
  • WiMax
  • Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs)
  • 3-5 miles range, no direct line of sight required
  • 2Mbits/s practical limit
  • Can use existing cell towers
  • Broadband over Power Lines (BPL)
  • More pervasive infrastructure, but requires extra
    equipment
  • Up to 2.7Mbits/s
  • Superimposing analog signal over AC
  • Small deployments in operation (e.g. Manassas,
    Virginia 10MBits/s for 30.00 a month)

11
Porter's Five Forces Model
  • Broadband over power lines
  • Wi-Fi free internet (Google)
  • Municipal utility internet
  • Wi-Max

New entrants
  • Cable and DSL Co.
  • cut-throat competition
  • Trend to provide a bundle of services
  • Cable companies converging from video to
    telephony
  • - Cox, Comcast
  • Telecom companies converging from telephony to
    video
  • - SBC, Bellsouth, AOL
  • Large number of
  • equipment suppliers are available
  • e.g. Nortel, Lucent, Cisco, Nokia etc.
  • Limited companies actually own network lines,
    and heavily depend on network owners
  • Broadband as a Commodity.
  • Some people have 3 to 4 providers to buy from
  • Tend to buy bundled services
  • Switching costs are low, unless annual contracts

Suppliers
Buyers
Substitutes
  • TV, Music
  • Newspapers
  • Telephone etc

Source Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy
Techniques for Analyzing Industries and
Competitors, (The Free Press, 1980)
12
Policy and Regulation Existing situation
  • US is 16th in the world in broadband penetration
    (ITU 2005 report)
  • Why is US so far behind?
  • monopolistic structure, entrenched management,
    and political power of incumbents
  • failure of effective policy and regulation for
    broadband industry (e.g. ,FCC regulation on
    spectrum allocation policy)
  • Legislative tug-of-war
  • Preserving Innovation in Telecom Act of 2005
  • Community Broadband Act of 2005

13
Policy and Regulation
  • Need for national broadband strategy
  • Continue to encourage highly successful open
    access model in Japan
  • competitors may use existing residential
    telephone infrastructure for a modest fee
  • competition and innovation ? cheap, high-speed
    broadband access
  • Regulations for emerging technologies
  • FCC better allocation of wireless spectrum
  • Municipal WiFi usage
  • Mixture of legislative, regulatory, and
    investment initiatives

14
Conclusion
  • Market Players
  • Broadband will replace dial-up
  • The Battle is still pretty much between Cable and
    DSL companies
  • Technology
  • New technologies such as BPL, Wi-Max, Satellite
    are emerging, but are not great threat to
    existing Cable DSL
  • Economics
  • Bundling as a way to keep existing and attract
    new customers
  • Segments based on Price and Speed
  • Regulation
  • Need for national broadband strategy, open
    access, economic incentives

15
Conclusion
  • Cable companies have advantage due to their
    infrastructure and quadruple play
  • They will be top player in coming years
  • No winner take all conditions, Cable companies,
    DSL companies, and new technologies will
    co-exists

16
Thank you
Clap Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com