Title: Using NCLB as an Organizing Tool for Educational Excellence Prepared by The Education Trust August 2
1Using NCLB as an Organizing Tool for Educational
ExcellencePrepared by The Education
TrustAugust 2005
2Under NCLB, parents and communities are entitled
to unprecedented amounts of information about the
performance of their schools and students.
3Some states and districts report this information
in a clear, comprehensible way.
4Online report card for BaltimoreAchievement by
race/ethnicity
Source Maryland Online Report Card,
http//www.mdreportcard.org
5Online report card for BaltimoreTrends over time
by race/ethnicity
Source Maryland Online Report Card,
http//www.mdreportcard.org
6Others make this information difficult to
understand.
7Online district report card for East Baton Rouge
Source Louisiana Department of Education,
http//www.doe.state.la.us
8Online school report card for East Baton Rouge
9Public Reporting
- States and districts must issue state, district
and school level annual report cards to the
public. - NCLB does not require new report cards PROVIDED
existing reports are modified as necessary to
include required information.
10Student Achievement
- The following information must be reported by
race/ethnicity, disability status, LEP, low
income and gender and migrant status - Student achievement at each proficiency level
- Graduation rates (and additional, state-selected
indicator for non-high schools) - How students performed on AYP indicators compared
with students in the district and the state as a
whole
11Qualified Teacher Information
- The percentage of
- teachers with emergency or provisional
credentials, - of classes taught by teachers teaching out of
field - Comparison of classes taught by HQT in
high-poverty vs. low-poverty schools.
12Teacher Distribution
- Every state must measure and report on whether
low-income and minority students are
disproportionately taught by inexperienced,
unqualified, out-of-field teachers. - Each state and local district must develop an
action plan to address disproportionate teacher
assignments. - Section 1111(b)(8)(C) of NCLB.
13Students Who Start 3rd Grade at About the Same
Level of Math Achievement
Source Heather Jordan, Robert Mendro, and Dash
Weerasinghe, The Effects of Teachers on
Longitudinal Student Achievement, 1997.
14Finish 5th Grade at Dramatically Different
Levels Depending on the Quality of Their Teachers
Source Heather Jordan, Robert Mendro, and Dash
Weerasinghe, The Effects of Teachers on
Longitudinal Student Achievement, 1997.
15Parent Right-To-Know Provision
- Title I schools must
- - notify in writing the parents of any students
not being taught by highly qualified teacher - inform all parents they have the right to request
information about qualifications of their
childrens teachers - Section 1111(h)(6) of NCLB. Additional parent
involvement policies in Section 1118.
16Percentage of Illinois Classes Taught by
Highly-Qualified Teachers
Source Illinois Department of Education
17Source Education Watch Online,
http//www.edtrust.org
18Percentage of Chicago-Area Classes Taught by
Highly-Qualified Teachers
Source Illinois Department of Education
19Distribution of School TQI by Region
- CPS schools mostly consist of lowest-quartile TQI
schools, and half are lowest 10. - The Southwest has the second highest proportion
of lowest-quartile TQI schools about one
quarter.
Source Illinois Education Research Council,
http//ierc.siue.edu/documents/NASH_Ed_Trust_July_
26_2005_final2.pdf
20Distribution of School TQI by School Percent
Free or Reduced Lunch
- TQI distribution is strongly related to school
poverty levels. - The differences continue across all four poverty
quartiles.
Source Illinois Education Research Council,
http//ierc.siue.edu/documents/NASH_Ed_Trust_July_
26_2005_final2.pdf.
21Distribution of School TQI by School Achievement
High School
Elementary/Middle School
- TQI is strongly related to school performance
Source Illinois Education Research Council,
http//ierc.siue.edu/documents/NASH_Ed_Trust_July_
26_2005_final2.pdf
22State decisions about how to structure
accountability systems have a big impact on
schools and students.
23States can decide how many students must be in a
group in order for that group to count for AYP
purposes.
24Florida n size
- In 2004,schools were accountable for every group
that had at least 30 students. - In 2005, that changed. Schools are now
accountable only for groups that make up at least
15 of all students, or have at least 100 members.
25Gulfview Middle SchoolNaples, Florida
- 72 White (504 tested students)
- 15 Latino (104 tested students)
- 11 African American (81 tested students)
- An A school under the Florida accountability
system - Did not make AYP for 2003-04
Source Florida Department of Education,
http//www.fldoe.org
26Achievement Gaps at Gulfview2004 Reading
Composite
2004 AYP Target31
Source Florida Department of Education,
http//www.fldoe.org
27Achievement Gaps at Gulfview2004 Math Composite
2004 AYP Target38
Source Florida Department of Education,
http//www.fldoe.org
28States can decide to add a confidence interval
around their achievement scores.
29Source Maryland Department of Education,
http//www.mdreportcard.org
30Illinois Confidence Interval
- From 3 margin of error to
- 95 confidence interval
- IMPACT?
- If you have 75 students in a group, 38
proficient is now counted as 47.5 - Even with 500 students, confidence interval is 5
- http//www.isbe.state.il.us/pdf/2005_ayp_95_CI.pdf
31States can also decide on how to calculate high
school graduation rates, and what graduation-rate
goals to set.
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35SCHOOLIMPROVEMENTPROCESS
- Cant be seen as punishing schools
- For this process to work right, states and
districts have to do more to help struggling
schools.
36There are dramatic differences in achievement
between the nations urban districts, even for
the same groups of students.
37 There is an 18 point gap between Latino 4th
graders in the District of Columbia and New York
(roughly equivalent to almost 2 years worth of
learning)
Significantly lower than the nation
Significantly higher than
the nation
SOURCE U.S. Department of Education, Institute
of Education Sciences, National Center for
Education Statistics, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Trial Urban
District Reading Assessment.
38 There is a 14 point gap between African
American 8th graders in Charlotte and Los Angeles
(roughly equivalent to 1 1/2 years worth of
learning)
Significantly lower than the nation
Significantly higher than the
nation
SOURCE U.S. Department of Education, Institute
of Education Sciences, National Center for
Education Statistics, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Trial Urban
District Reading Assessment.
39After 2 Years of Not Making AYP Needs
Improvement.
- School must inform parents and explain reasons
for schools identification before the beginning
of the next school year - Develop improvement plan, including parents in
the planning process - Students can transfer to higher performing public
schools in district. (Title I funds pay for
transfers.)
40School Improvement Plan
- The plan must
- Strengthen curriculum in specific subjects and
areas that caused school not to make AYP - Use at least 10 of Title 1 on teacher training,
including teacher mentoring - Specify how parents will be provided with written
notice of plan and progress - include strategies to promote parent
involvement. - Section 1116(b)(3) of NCLB
41Either District or State MUST
- Analyze test data to identify problems in
instruction - Examine parent involvement policy and make sure
it is being implemented - Help identify effective curriculum and teacher
training strategies that have worked in similar
circumstances - Analyzing school budget to make sure school is
using money effectively. - Section 1116(b)(4) of NCLB
42School districts have a specific legal
responsibility to
- Inform parents about what the school is doing to
improve - Inform parents WHAT THE STATE AND/OR DISTRICT is
doing to help the school improve - Whats parents can do to help the school improve.
- Section 1116(b)(6) of NCLB
43After 3 Years of Not Making AYP
- District must provide supplemental services to
low income students. (Title I funds pay for
supplemental services.) - State must license and evaluate providers of
supplemental services.
44After 4 Years (In Year Five) Corrective Action
- Continue with choice and suppl services
continues. - District and school must implement at least one,
but not all of the following - Institute a new curriculum, including appropriate
professional development - Appoint an outside expert to advise the school
- Extend the school year or the school day for the
school - Restructure the schools internal organizational
structure - Significantly decrease management authority at
the school level OR - Replace the school staff who are relevant to the
failure to make AYP. - Section 1116(b)(7)(C) of NCLB
45After 5 Years (In Year 6)Plan for Restructuring
- Develop an alternate governance plan, in case you
dont make AYP again during Year 6. - The alternate governance plan must include one
of the following, CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW - Reopen the school as a public charter school.
- Replace all or most of the staff responsible for
the lack of progress. - Enter into a contract with a private company to
operate the school. - Turn over operation and management of the school
to the state. - Other fundamental reforms approved by the state.
46In Year Seven Restructuring
- Implement alternate governance plan if you didnt
make AYP the previous year. - Teachers and parents must be asked to comment on
this plan and must be allowed to participate in
developing this plan. - Section 1116(b)(8)(C) of NCLB
47The only non-negotiables for schools in need of
improvement are choice and supplemental services
for low-income students.
- Local officials retain tremendous discretion to
implement aggressive or mild interventions,
depending on facts and professional judgment.
48- The Education Trust
- www.edtrust.org
- 202-293-1217