Equity, then Social Insurance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Equity, then Social Insurance

Description:

Equity in the Delivery of Health Care: Some International Comparisons ... Calculating Lorenz Curves. Cumulative Percentage of Population = F ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: AGoo4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Equity, then Social Insurance


1
Equity, then Social Insurance
2
What is equity?
  • Horizontal equity -- Equals should be treated
    equally. Usually thought of with respect to
    taxes.
  • Vertical equity - Unequals should be treated
    unequally. For example, rich should pay more
    than poor, but should rich pay higher
    percentage than poor?
  • General sense of equity in health care has to do
    with everyone getting some.

3
Access v. Utilization
  • Possibly unique to the health field, we break
    these up.
  • Do people have access to care, even if they dont
    use it?
  • This is different from utilization, which refers
    to visits, days, etc.

4
Equity in the Delivery of Health Care Some
International Comparisons
  • van Doorslaer and Wagstaff argue that most accept
    the premise that health care should be financed
    according to ability to pay, but should be
    delivered according to need. How do we address
    equity in the delivery of health care.
  • They note that there is some contention between
    those who want to use utilization as a measure,
    and others who want to use access as a measure.

5
Equal treatment for equal need
  • Link between provider incentives and patient
    income is likely to be important in determining
    how close a health care system comes to achieving
    equal treatment for equal need.
  • The most obvious way that the income of a patient
    might influence provider behavior is if the
    provider is paid differently depending on whether
    the patient is being treated publicly or
    privately.
  • General proposal Assessment of equity in the
    delivery of health care ought to be based on
    treatment differentials adjusted for differences
    in need.

6
Tests for inequity
  • Tests for inequity
  • Medical Expenditures
  • ?p ?phi upi Poor
  • mi
  • ?r ?rhi uri Rich
  • ?p, ?r are expected expenditures if healthy ?p,
    ?r are increments if you get sick.
  • Test
  • Equity if ?r ?p, ?r ?p.
  • You want, of course, to adjust this stuff for
    demographics, health status, etc.

7
Equity and Inequity
Inequity
Equity
expenditures
expenditures
?r
?r
?p
?p
h
h
1.0
1.0
health
health
8
2 part models
  • You would want to measure these with 2 part
    models
  • Do people use care (or have access to care)
  • If they use (have access), how much do they use,
    spend, etc.
  • Also propose a type of Gini coefficient that
    basically works across income classes.
  • They ask How much would each income group have
    received on average if its age structure and
    morbidity levels had been the same as those of
    the population at large?
  • Use the expenditure shares based on the equations
    above to estimate shares for groups of the
    population ordered by income levels.

9
Gini Coefficients
  • Not quite a standard Gini. Suppose we have this
  • Income quartile Expenditures Cumulative
  • 0-25 15 15
  • 25-50 35 50
  • 50-75 35 85
  • 75-100 15 100
  • Standard Gini would be 15, 15, 35, 35 Comes
    out to be 0.2. You should calculate it.

Cumulative
Lowest Expend.
10
Gini Coefficients
  • Not quite a standard Gini. Suppose we have this
  • Income quartile Expenditures Cumulative
  • 0-25 15 15
  • 25-50 35 50
  • 50-75 35 85
  • 75-100 15 100
  • This Gini turns out to be 0. If spending favors
    rich, curve will be below diagonal -- Gini gt 0
    if vice versa, Gini lt 0.

Cumulative
Income Quartile
11
Table 20.1
  • Country Measure of Inequality Statistical Test
  • Denmark -0.055 Yes
  • Ireland -0.076 Yes
  • Italy -0.036 Yes
  • Netherlands 0.025 No
  • Spain 0.146 Yes
  • Switzerland -0.043 No
  • UK 0.013 Yes
  • US 0.028 Yes
  • Positive favors rich Negative favors poor.

12
Conclusions
  • Persons in equal need in U.S. are not treated the
    same, although this finding depends on whether
    one examines only the under-65 (in which case the
    inequity seems to favor the worse off), or the
    entire adult population (in which case the
    inequity favors, on balance, the better off).
  • Appears to be inequity favoring the well-off even
    in some countries where there is universal and
    comprehensive public coverage, notably Spain and
    U.K.
  • Health care systems which do not have universal
    and comprehensive public coverage are not
    necessarily those with the highest degree of
    inequity.

13
Calculating Lorenz Curves
  • Cumulative Percentage of Population F
  • Cumulative Percentage of Care F1.
  • Define ? (F - F1)/ ? 2
  • ? (F F1)/ ? 2
  • Define Lorenz curve function as
  • ? a?? (? 2 - ?)?
  • In logs, estimate regression
  • log (?) log (a) ? log ? ? log (? 2 - ?)
  • Gini G is
  • G 2 (3 ? ?)/2 a B(1?, 1?),
  • Where B is the statistical Beta function.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com