Simulation of a hybrid opticalradioacoustic neutrino detector at South Pole - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Simulation of a hybrid opticalradioacoustic neutrino detector at South Pole

Description:

Simulation of a hybrid opticalradioacoustic neutrino detector at South Pole – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: delia8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Simulation of a hybrid opticalradioacoustic neutrino detector at South Pole


1
Acoustic neutrino detection at the South Pole
latest results from SPATS
Delia Tosi Acoustic Neutrino Detection working
groupIceCube Collaboration July 15th, 2009TEV
Particle Astrophysics 2009 SLAC National
Accelerator Laboratory
2
Outline
  • Hybrid neutrino detection
  • Acoustics at the South Pole- IceCube South
    Pole Acoustic Test Setup (SPATS)
  • Results - sound speed - noise vs. depth and
    time behavior - transients localization-
    attenuation length
  • Conclusions and open questions

3
Hybrid neutrino detection
  • extend energy range of sensitivity ? large
    volume (?)
  • calibrate R/A with O and R A
  • reconstruct energy and direction
  • reject background
  • UHE neutrino events are HYBRID
  • Optical IceCube, Antares
  • Radio RICE, ANITA
  • Acoustic SAUND, ONDE

HYBRID detection possible in ice
4
Simulation studies
astro-ph/0512604
10 km3
  • IceCube 13 optical strings 60 DOMs between
    1.4/2.45 km 91 radio/acoustic strings
  • 5 radio antennas (every 100m in 200-600 m)
    300 acoustic receivers (every 5m in 5-1500
    m)
  • Inputs ESS GZK flux model (O? 0.7) ice model
    hadronic shower models etc ..

BUT FIRST WHAT ARE THE ACOUSTIC ICE
PROPERTIES?
5
South Pole Acoustic Test Setup (SPATS)
  • 4 strings in IceCube holes
  • instrumented depth80 m - 500 m
  • per string
  • 7 sensors
  • 7 transmitters
  • String-PC
  • digitization
  • time stamping
  • Master-PC
  • data handling
  • GPS timing
  • data transfer via satellite
  • Monitoring through daily mails

C
D
A
B
Strings A, B, C installed in 2006/07 String D
installed in 2007/08
6
SPATS stage design
  • Transmitter
  • HV generator
  • ring shaped piezoceramic coated in epoxy
  • Sensor
  • 3 piezoelectric ceramic tablets
  • pre-amplifier
  • analog signal transmission
  • steel pressure housing
  • String-D
  • improved sensorsmechanical decoupling of
    channels
  • improved transmitters higher power
  • HADESalternative sensor design witha
    piezoceramic outside thesteel housing

HADES
String D
Strings A,B,C
7
Acoustic Pinger
batteries GPS receiver
winch 4 - wires cable
  • Retrievable transmitter used in water filled
    holes, before IceCube deployment as unique
    source for
  • - calibration of the detector
  • - attenuation length analysis
  • - sound speed measurement
  • 6 holes in 2007/2008 4 holes in 2008/2009down
    to 500 m depthtwo stops at 190, 250, 320, 400,
    500 m depth
  • High quality data 2008/2009- centralizer to
    avoid swinging- higher repetition frequency

in-waterstage
8
Icecube, SPATS and pinger holes
9
SPATS goals results
  • SPATS investigate feasibility of acoustic
    neutrino detection at the South Pole ? Goal is
    to gain information about
  • - Sound speed what is the sound speed
    value? is it depth dependent ( refraction?)-
    Transient events are there transients
    events? what are their features (rate,
    sources)? could they be a significant source
    of background?
  • - Noise
  • what is the noise level? which neutrino
    energy threshold does it correspond to?
  • - Attenuation coefficient
  • never measured up to now, only models are
    known
  • depth dependent?
  • frequency dependent?

10
Sound speed profile measurement
agreement
  • 2 combinations 125 m distance from pinger data
    season 2007-2008
  • better than 1 accuracy
  • First measurement in situ for P and S waves

11
Transient events sources localization
  • Triggered mode data taking
  • Events above threshold recorded independently
    on 3 sensors on each string
  • Offline coincidence requirement
  • Vertex reconstruction from arrival times
  • Two kind of sources identified
  • stable water reservoir wells
  • temporary freezing holes
  • Residual lt1 event / day from unidentified source

12
Noise Temporal evolution
String D deployed 24 Dec 2007
  • peaks correlated with IceCube drilling,inter-stri
    ng data taking
  • Hypothesis freeze-in improves coupling to ice
    causing noise level to increase and then
    stabilize in the first couple months
  • From laboratory measurements
  • Sensitivity changes from 1 to 100 bar lt 30
  • Sensitivity increases by a factor 1.5 0.2 from
    0ºC to -50ºC in air
  • Noise level below firn lt 10 mPa

13
Pinger attenuation analysis -1
  • Pinger data from season 0809
  • single channel
  • pinger stopped at same depth
  • aligned holes (all 2008-2009)
  • ? Minimized systematic uncertainty
  • residual azimuthal/ polar angle variation of
    sensitivity
  • ENERGY calculated in time domain for each channel
    and over all the holes, noise subtracted from
    pinger-off runs
  • LINEAR FIT of y ln (vE d)
  • 47 independent measurements 45 after quality
    cut a 3 sa
  • Weighted mean value and width of distributiona
    3.3 0.7 10-3 m ? ? 306 64 m
  • Depth dependence?
  • Frequency dependence?

1 example channel
14
Pinger attenuation analysis -2
  • Cross-checks
  • Calculated spectrum of signal and noise using
    time-window selection before averaging
  • Noise subtraction from signal-off windows
  • ENERGY calculated in frequency domain
  • Integration over the whole frequency band
  • ? Results consistent with previous
  • Calculated spectrum of waveform after averaging
  • Noise subtraction from pinger-off runs
  • ENERGY calculated in frequency domain
  • Integration over 2 selected bandwidths
  • ? No significant trend observed

3-17 kHz
17-30 kHz
15
Inter-string attenuation analysis 2 methods
  • Inter-string data
  • pulse with a frozen-in transmitter
  • listen with all the other sensors
  • single-level method combine a single
    transmitter with all sensors at the same depth ?
    Systematic uncertainty
  • combines unknown angular response function of
    sensors
  • ? ? 320 100 m
  • ratio method ratios of all the combinations
  • ? Systematic uncertainty
  • combines unknown angular response function of
    sensors and transmitters
  • ? ? 210.0 75.8 m

16
Summary
  • SPATS experiment designed to study the
    feasibility of an acoustic neutrino detector at
    the South Pole.
  • Significant achievement in each goal set
  • Sound speed
  • 1st measurement of the sound speed in deep ice
    both for S and P waves
  • Noise level
  • stable and Gaussian, decreases with depth
  • with reasonable assumptions lt 10 mPa below 250 m
  • Transient noise
  • transients acquisition 60 live-time
  • vertex reconstruction achieved sources
    identified.
  • possibility to study attenuation frequency
    dependence
  • Attenuation length
  • pinger data allowed for measurement in the
    frequency range up to 20 kHz 300 m
  • inter-string analyses confirm the pinger result

17
Open questions
  • Attenuation length smaller than expected
  • Reason for difference between expectation and
    measurement?
  • ? work in progress new models are under
    discussion
  • Is neutrino acoustic detection in ice feasible at
    the South Pole?
  • ? the detector concepts have to be re-designed
  • ? new simulations have to answer the question

18
Thermo acoustic model
  • In the lab
  • Sudden deposition of energy generates pressure
    wave
  • Thermo-acoustic model confirmed _at_ Brookhaven 1979
    200 MeV proton beam (LINAC), 4.5 cm
    diameterenergy deposited in water 1019?1021 eV
  • Bipolar acoustic pulse proportional to ? c2 ?
    / CP c sound speed in medium ? expansion
    coefficientCP specific heat of the medium
  • From neutrinos
  • Hadronic shower formation at interaction
    vertexcarries (on average) ¼ E?
  • ? generates energy deposition in the ice
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com