Content Expectations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Content Expectations

Description:

J. Martin Rochester, Ph.D., University of Missouri - St. Louis, Civics and Government ... CIVICS AND GOVERNMENT. UNITED STATES HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY. WORLD ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: bobb65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Content Expectations


1
Michigans Content Expectations in the Social
Studies
Bob Bain, Chair High School Committees Stan
Masters, Chair K-8 Committees
2
Overview
  • Bob Bain
  • The K-12 Task
  • The K-12 Challenges
  • The K-12 Process
  • The High School Expectations
  • Some High School What ifs . . .
  • Stan Masters
  • Significant K-8 changes
  • role of professional learning communities
  • Role of authentic assessment and instruction

3
Five Questions Ill Consider
  • What was our mission?
  • What are the challenges in social studies?
  • What was the process and feedback ?
  • What are features in High School Content
    Expectations? What should you keep in mind when
    reviewing them?
  • What questions might we ask if .?

4
Background Our Mission ..
Our Mission
5
Enduring Challenges of Social Studies Standards
  • Integrating separate disciplines
  • Representing both disciplinary thinking and
    substance
  • Providing an effective K-12 scope and sequence
  • Managing Rigor and Reality Pedagogy and Politics

5
6
Curriculum Protocol Flowchart
Draft Documents Small Review Group MDE
representative practitioners
Document Development Work Group of Scholars Chair
and 5 8 appointed members OSI Convened
Final Documents Dissemination 3 Regional 10
Localized
Final Documents State Board Approval
7
Feedback from Reviews
  • Too much Not enough . . .
  • Majority currently in curriculum
  • Integration of content too integrated
  • Too specific not specific enough . . .
  • You left out this event or this group.

7
8
National Review
  • Ross E. Dunn, Ph.D., San Diego State University,
    World History
  • Susan W. Hardwick, Ph.D., University of Oregon,
    Geography
  • Gary B. Nash, Ph.D., UCLA, History
  • J. Martin Rochester, Ph.D., University of
    Missouri - St. Louis, Civics and Government
  • William Walstad, Ph.D., University of Nebraska,
    Economics

9
High School ExpectationsThings to Look For
  • Foundational Expectations
  • Cross References
  • Merger of Thinking and Substance
  • Spatial Temporal Organizations in History and
    Geography
  • Making embedded features more visible

9
10
National Review
  • innovative cognitive and pedagogical approach to
    studying the past at different scales of time and
    space. Represents a large part of the answer to
    the chronic problem in history and social studies
    education of incoherence and fragmentation.

  • Ross Dunn
  • the most innovative, imaginative, and up-to-date
    state standards that I have seen.
    Ross Dunn
  • have the potential to expand Michigan students
    understanding of what it means to become active
    and engaged learners and citizens.
    Susan Hardwick

11
National Review
  • . . .this is the most sophisticated and
    carefully constructed framework yet to appear.
    It should not only serve the teachers and
    students of the State of Michigan well but stand
    as a model for other states to follow.
    Gary Nash
  • correctly recognizes the extensive prior
    national work and includes a good description
    and scheme of the NAEP framework William
    Walstad
  • were certainly rigorous in the demands made on
    students, solid in terms of clarity and
    specificity.. Conscious efforts made to provide
    coherence offers guidance that promises
    first-rate social studies education in Michigan
    schools. J. Marty Rochester

12
K-12 Revised to Provide
  • a planned transition from elementary to middle
    school and high school
  • a strong foundation for meeting the high school
    content expectations
  • K-12 vertical alignment
  • a system for referencing standards to other
    sections, grades/courses, and to national
    standards
  • increased transparency (NAEP, national standards)

13
Things to Remember
  • Represents Content, Not Pedagogy
  • Does Not Show Instructional Sequence
  • Differentiation between required and suggested
    content
  • Requires active, disciplined inquiry
  • Guides instructional goals

14
Things I might be considering if I were a
  • Classroom Teacher
  • Department Chair
  • District Supervisor
  • Superintendent

15
Sequence of Study
Sequence of Study
16
K-5 Grade-Specific Context
  • Kindergarten Myself and Others
  • 1st Grade Families and Schools
  • 2nd Grade The Local Community
  • 3rd Grade Michigan Studies
  • 4th Grade United States Studies
  • 5th Grade Integrated United States History

17
6-8 Grade-Specific Context
  • 6th Grade Western Hemisphere Studies
  • 7th Grade Eastern Hemisphere Studies
  • 8th Grade Integrated United States
    History

18
Significant Changes
  • Context for Grades 3 and 4
  • World History in Grades 6 and 7

19
Professional Learning Communities
  • Shared Norms and Values
  • Focus on Student Learning
  • Reflective Dialogue
  • Public Practice
  • Collaboration

20
Role of Authentic Assessment and Instruction
  • Standards for Authentic Assessment Tasks
  • Organization of Information
  • Consideration of Alternatives
  • Disciplinary Content
  • Disciplinary Process
  • Elaborated Communication
  • Problem Connected to the World Beyond the
    Classroom
  • Audience Beyond the Classroom

21
Role of Authentic Assessment and Instruction
  • Standards for Authentic Instruction
  • Higher Order thinking
  • Deep Knowledge
  • Substantive Conversation
  • Connections to the World Beyond the Classroom
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com