GRAND AVENUE

1
GRAND AVENUE NORTHWEST CORRIDOR STUDY
MARICOPA ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
Public Meeting West Valley Art Museum April 29,
2002
2
(No Transcript)
3
Agenda

• Study Process
• Needs and Options
• Summary of Potential Recommendations
• Specific Potential Recommendations
• Questions Answers

4
Grand Avenue NW Corridor Study Project Working
Papers

• 1. Related Studies and Plans
• 2. Socio-Economic Conditions
• 3. Transportation Facilities and Conditions
• 4. Environmental Issues and Title VI
• 5. Major Issues, Goals, and Policies
• 6. Long-Term Roadway Needs
• 7. Alternative Mode Needs
• 8. Development and Evaluation of Investment
  Options
• ALL PAPERS MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE
  MAGWEBSITE www.mag.maricopa.gov, under
  Transportation

5
Needs and Options Papers

• WP 6 Long-Term Roadway Needs
• Design Volumes LOS, Capacity Deficiencies
• Roadway Capacity, Intersection, Roadside
  Development, ITS, and Other Needs
• WP 7 Alternative Mode Needs
• Transit, Park and Ride, Bike, Pedestrian, Golf
  Carts
• WP 8 Development and Evaluation of Investment
  Options
• More than 60 options identified. Due to the large
  number of options, todays presentation will
  focus on consultant recommendations unless
  requests are received to review specific options
  not included in the recommendations

6
(No Transcript)
7
Ultimate Concept

• No-Build Excessive congestion delay
• Enhanced Arterial / Limited Expressway
• Full Expressway
• High cost
• R/W requirements impacts of takes
• Signal removal
• Business access removal
• Higher volumes, higher speeds, more trucks
• Noise / environmental impacts

8
Summary of Potential Consultant
RecommendationsBasic Highway Features for
Grand Avenue

• Widen Grand to Six-Lane Arterial
• Add Turn Lanes at Selected Intersections
• Extend ITS Smart Corridor to SR 303L
• Conduct Signal Timing Study
• Evaluate RR Crossings
• Place Guardrail or Barrier Along Drainage Channel
• Landscaping and Lighting by Local Governments

9
Summary of Potential Consultant
RecommendationsTransit Improvements

• Create Regional Funding Source
• Develop Integrated Dial-A-Ride System
• Extend Metro Transit Along Arterials
• Develop Park-and-Ride Lots

10
Summary of Potential Consultant
RecommendationsBicycle Improvements

• Provide Shoulders on Grand Avenue for
  Share-The-Road Concept
• Encourage West Valley Non-Motorized
  Transportation and Recreation Corridor
• Develop Plans to Connect Residential Areas to
  Regional Trail System Local Governments

11
Summary of Potential Consultant
RecommendationsPedestrian Improvements

• Develop Plans to Connect Residential Areas to
  Regional Trail System Local Governments
• Enhance Pedestrian Travel Within Cities and
  Neighborhoods Local Governments

12
Summary of Potential Consultant
RecommendationsElectric Cart Improvements

• Conduct Follow-Up Study of Specific Sign and
  Marking Needs Local Government
• Retain Laws Prohibiting Carts on Streets with
  Speed Limits Over 35 mph

13
Summary of Potential Consultant
RecommendationsGrade Separations Long-Term
Improvements

• Bell Road
• El Mirage/Thompson Ranch Road Extension
• Meeker/Reems or Emergency Only
• 103rd Avenue

14
Priorities

• Priority One
• Basic Highway Features
• Further Evaluation of El Mirage/Thompson Ranch
  Road Extension
• Obtain Funding Source for Transit
• Maintain Law Limiting Carts to Streets with35
  mph or less

15
Priorities (continued)

• Priority Two
• Develop Integrated Dial-A-Ride
• Encourage Non-Motorized Corridors Along Rivers
  and Provide Connections from Neighborhoods
• Prepare Action Plan for Special Signage and
  Markings for Seniors and Carts
• Priority Three
• Further Evaluate and Develop Specific Plan and
  Program for Implementation of Four Grade
  Separations

16
Detail Recommendations
17
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Grand Avenue 1. The ultimate concept for Grand
Avenue is an enhanced arterial/limited
expressway. 2. It is a regional road that serves
through traffic and city arterial traffic.
3. The emphasis for Grand Avenue is on the
movement of motorized vehicles and, therefore,
not on pedestrians, bicycles, or local transit if
it hinders traffic. 4. Full access control and
removal of all signals would have major cost and
land use impacts that do not appear acceptable to
the communities.
18
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Basic Highway Features for Grand Avenue 6. Widen
to six lanes and upgrade drainage system. 7. Add
turn lanes at selected intersections (dual lefts,
right-turn lanes). 8. Extend ITS Smart Corridor
including signal coordination and traffic
monitoring. 9. Conduct signal timing
study. 10. Evaluate RR crossings for safety and
ADA compliance.
19
Traffic Forecasts on Grand Avenue
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Regional ITS Smart Corridor Infrastructure and
Operational Goals

• Real-time coordinated traffic management
• Real-time traffic flow speed information via
  system detectors
• Traffic flow and incident monitoring via
  closed-circuit television (CCTV) with access and
  control shared by operating agencies
• Traffic advisories and detour information via
  Variable or Dynamic Message Signs at strategic
  locations
• Coordinated traffic flow management between
  freeways and arterials at interchanges

24
(No Transcript)
25
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Basic Highway Features for Grand Avenue
(continued) 11. Landscaping provided by local
governments in cooperation with ADOT. 12. Street
lighting provided by local governments in
cooperation with ADOT. 13. Evaluate signage
designed for elderly drivers and coordinated with
local jurisdictions based upon state and national
research. See National Conference at MAG (flyer
on table and on MAG website, www.mag.maricopa.gov
14. Place guardrail or barrier along drainage
channel that is adjacent to travel lanes on Grand
Avenue. 15. Support construction of SR 303L and
the arterial grid to divert traffic from Grand
Avenue.
26
2025 Levels of Service (PM Peak)
27
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Transit Improvements 17. Encourage creation of a
regional funding source, enabling implementation
of a multi-jurisdictional transit system in the
Northwest Valley. 18. Develop an integrated
Dial-A-Ride system covering Northwest Valley
communities. 19. Extend metropolitan transit
system along arterials in corridor area in
accordance with a master plan for bus service to
be developed at a future date. 20. Develop
Park-and-Ride lots in accordance with MAG
plan. 21. If express bus service is extended into
the corridor area, express buses can operate on
Grand Avenue in mixed use travel lanes.
28
MAG LRTP 2001 Update Park Ride Lots
29
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Transit Improvements (continued) 22. Study
innovative approaches to serving seniors and
persons with disabilities. 23. Monitor the MAG
High Capacity Transit Study and its potential
impact on the corridor area. 24. With the
emphasis on the movement of motorized vehicles on
Grand Avenue, local bus service on Grand Avenue
should not be a priority to avoid hindering
traffic. 25. Bus stops on Grand should be
restricted to locations with safe pedestrian
access to and from adjacent communities. Stops
should have bus bays where feasible and connect
to pedestrian walkways from adjacent
neighborhoods.
30
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Pedestrian Improvements 27. With the emphasis on
the movement of motorized vehicles on Grand
Avenue, pedestrian movements along or across
Grand Avenue should not be a priority to avoid
the creation of safety conflicts. 28. If new
grade separations are constructed along Grand
Avenue, pedestrian travel across Grand should be
considered in the design of the grade
separations. 29. All new street improvements
should meet ADA requirements for pedestrian
travel.
31
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Pedestrian Improvements (continued) 30. Local
governments should develop specific plans for
connecting the residential areas to the regional
trail systems being developed such as the West
Valley non-motorized transportation and
recreation corridor along the New River and Agua
Fria River. These connections should not be along
Grand Avenue. 31. Within cities and neighborhoods
away from Grand Avenue, local governments should
look for ways to enhance pedestrian travel such
as reducing length of crosswalks, separating
sidewalks from the street curb, and providing
shade for walkways. 32. Local governments should
revise land development standards to enhance
pedestrian movements within activity centers.
32
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Bicycle Improvements 34. With the emphasis on the
movement of motorized vehicles on Grand Avenue,
bicycle movements along or across Grand Avenue
should not be a priority to avoid the creation of
safety conflicts. 35. Bicycle movements along
Grand Avenue may be accommodated on shoulders or
wider outside travel lanes through the
share-the-road concept. 36. If new grade
separations are constructed along Grand Avenue,
bicycle travel across Grand should be considered
in the design of the grade separations.
33
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Bicycle Improvements (continued) 37. Encourage
the development of the West Valley non-motorized
transportation and recreation corridor. 38. Local
governments should develop specific plans for
connecting the residential areas to the regional
trail systems being developed such as the West
Valley non-motorized transportation and
recreation corridor along the New River and Agua
Fria River. These connections should not be along
Grand Avenue.
34
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Electric Cart Improvements 40. Consider the needs
of cart travel in the design of new routes and
grade separations. 41. Local governments should
conduct a follow-up specific study to develop
recommendations for signage, lane markings, and
site development standards to accommodate cart
needs. 42. Retain existing laws that prohibit
golf carts on streets with speed limits greater
than 35 mph, including Grand Avenue.
35
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Longer-Term Potential Grade Separations 44. Grade
separation interchange at Grand and Bell. This is
the busiest intersection and the first priority
for a grade separation to relieve
congestion. 45. Extension of El Mirage Road from
Thompson Ranch Road to Olive, with a grade
separation interchange at Grand Avenue. This
proposed roadway would be part of the city/county
road system and local governments should take the
lead in implementation.
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
Potential Consultant Recommendations
Longer-Term Potential Grade Separations
(continued) 46. Meeker/Reems grade separation
interchange or emergency access grade separation
to Del E. Webb Hospital. This facility would
primarily benefit local community travel so local
funding participation would be required. 47. 103rd
Avenue grade separation. This facility would
provide a linkage between north and south Sun
City for motorized and non-motorized travel. It
would almost exclusively benefit local community
travel so local funding would be required.
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
Next Steps

• MAG Committees for approval to consider in the
  RTP Process
• Return Questionnaires by May 10, 2002

43
Questions Answers