Comparing the USUK Constitutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparing the USUK Constitutions

Description:

'The American Constitution emerged from the smoke and gunfire of a revolution. ... An American Dynasty the Kennedys. The Kennedys America's surrogate royal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:177
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: igshistor
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparing the USUK Constitutions


1
  • Comparing the US/UK Constitutions

2
Section 1 What is a Constitution?
  • A Constitution is a code of rules laying down
    both the framework and powers of the government
    and the relationship between that government and
    the governed.

3
  • The American Constitution emerged from the smoke
    and gunfire of a revolution. The British
    Constitution emerged from the mists of time.

4
Design a constitution
  • Republic or monarchy ?
  • Prime ministerial or presidential ?
  • How often should elections take place ?
  • Which body has the final say over constitutional
    matters ?
  • Who is the commander of the armed forces ?
  • How are citizens rights to be protected

5
  • Everybody talks of the Constitution, but all
    sides forget that the Constitution is extremely
    well, and would do very well if they would but
    leave it alone.
  • Horace Walpole, 1770.

6
  • Government without a constitution is power
    without a right.
  • Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man (1795)

7
Heywoods classification of Constitutions
  • A- Form ( sources)
  • B- Ease of amendment
  • C- Degree to which it is observed
  • D- Institutional structure

8
Sources of the constitutions
  • US one single document plus amendments.
    Judicial reviews made by the Supreme Court.
  • UK statute and common law, conventions,
    constitutional experts.

9
Whats required to change the constitution ?
  • US- Two thirds majority of both houses of
    congress required plus three quarters of the
    legislatures of each state must approve an
    amendment.
  • UK- The simple passage of a bill through both
    houses of parliament plus Royal Assent.
  • BUT House of Lords can only delay a bill and
    the monarchs consent is merely a convention.
  • Only restriction is that parliament cannot bind
    its successors, i.e cannot pass a law that cannot
    be repealed by a future parliament. Parliament is
    sovereign therefore it must always have the power
    to repeal laws passed by a previous parliament.

10
To what degree are both constitutions observed ?
  • The US Constitution is almost a sacred text
    held in high regard. Foreigners wishing to become
    US citizens must learn sections of it !
  • The UK Constitution has survived over centuries
    because it has adapted to changing needs.
    However, the rise of presidential style
    government in the UK has eroded the concept of
    parliamentary sovereignty.
  • Is the union of England and Scotland under threat
    ? Could be the biggest constitutional change for
    300 years.

11
Institutional structure
  • USA is a presidential system. They do not have a
    hereditary monarchy. However they have political
    dynasties
  • The Kennedys
  • The Bushes
  • The Clintons ?
  • USA is also a federal system but the power of
    the federal government over the states has
    increased enormously in the 20th Century.

12
An American Dynasty the Kennedys
13
The Kennedys Americas surrogate royal family ?
14
John Kennedy Junior
Before his untimely death in plane crash in 1999,
John Kennedy Junior was seen by many as a
possible successor to the Kennedy political
dynasty.
15
A new American Dynasty the Bushes
16
Bill and Hillary the next dynasty ?
If Hillary wins in 2008 that would mean the
Clintons and the Bushes will have held the office
of President between their two families since
1988.
17
Institutional structure
  • The UK is a unitary state but devolution has
    eroded that concept since 1997.
  • The UK is said to be a parliamentary system but
    the rise of party whips and presidential style
    government has eroded parliaments power at the
    expense of party leaders and PMs.
  • EU supranational controls have further eroded
    parliaments sovereignty.
  • The monarchy remains a convention but one that
    may not last another 100 years ?

18
Summary table
19
Debate
  • The UK Constitution is out-dated and no longer
    works. A new codified version (based on the US
    model) should be adopted for the 21st Century.
    Discuss.
  • One group will defend the UK constitution as it
    is and the other will argue for its reform.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com